Topic: What the fuck? Whenever I said "Would you rather" you all corrected me to say "Would you whether"...
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #66,067
Was this just one big fucking trolling scheme this entire time? I just Google'd and it looks like it's the former. What the fucking shit?!!!
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #813,761
fuck you
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,762
trolling is illegal I am calling the cyber police
Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,769
The Rules of Grammar
"I am almost sure by witness of my ear, but cannot be positive, for I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules. A generation ago I knew the rules---knew them by heart, word for word, though not their meanings---and I still know one of them: the one which says---but never mind, it will come back to me presently."
"Great books are weighed and measured by their style and matter, and not the trimmings and shadings of their grammar."
"The Queen's English"
"There is no such thing as the Queen's English. The property has gone into the hands of a joint stock company and we own the bulk of the shares."
"...ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred, borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft and preserving the memory of the revered crime."
"I am almost sure by witness of my ear, but cannot be positive, for I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules. A generation ago I knew the rules---knew them by heart, word for word, though not their meanings---and I still know one of them: the one which says---but never mind, it will come back to me presently."
"Great books are weighed and measured by their style and matter, and not the trimmings and shadings of their grammar."
"The Queen's English"
"There is no such thing as the Queen's English. The property has gone into the hands of a joint stock company and we own the bulk of the shares."
"...ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred, borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft and preserving the memory of the revered crime."
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,773
Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,774
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,778
Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,782
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,785
Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,786
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Damn n I was ready to bring up a very old TC post where I archive Mark Twain's point of views on Grammer and Spreling
But trust this I have it ready to roll out
Damn n I was ready to bring up a very old TC post where I archive Mark Twain's point of views on Grammer and Spreling
But trust this I have it ready to roll out
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,792
@813,785 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> Oh. I get it now.
idiot
@813,782 (Syntax)
> Wood you care to ask about need 4correct spreling?
fucker
> Oh. I get it now.
idiot
@813,782 (Syntax)
> Wood you care to ask about need 4correct spreling?
fucker
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,851
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 42 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,859
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> How am I an idiot for not immediately understanding a misspelled word?
*misspreled
> How am I an idiot for not immediately understanding a misspelled word?
*misspreled