Topic: Three former Google employees are perpetuating the wage gap myth.

brie !iFDoautiSM started this discussion 9 years ago #66,057

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-google-lawsuit/lawsuit-accuses-google-of-bias-against-women-in-pay-promotions-idUSKCN1BP2RQ

I look forward to Google's victory in this class action suit.

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #813,726

> I look forward to Google's victory in this class action suit.

but why?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,727

He does not work. He is some kind of she.

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,728

@813,726 (B)
the class in this lawsuit is every woman who ever worked for google. if they lose they are ruined.

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,729

oh yeah you look like this that why

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,730

@previous (B)
i dont see the relevance.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,731

@813,728 (brie !iFDoautiSM)
uhhh okay?

The success of a company is more important than equity and equality of its employees?

What sort of class traitor are you?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,732

OP
You live on welfare.
Fix that before criticizing others.

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,733

@813,731 (D)
they signed a contract... they could either renegotiate or end the contract. dont get pissy that your co-workers are better negotiators and sue about it years later.

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,735

@813,732 (E)
rule 8

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,739

@813,733 (brie !iFDoautiSM)
I believe systemic discrimination is a concern of law and supersedes private contracts

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,741

I get the feeling that Google might lose this one, although, it might not ruin them as anticipated.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,747

@813,733 (brie !iFDoautiSM)
@813,739 (D)
Anonymous D is right, systemic discrimination is a real thing. Whichever way the trial goes, it is an issue worth legal scrutiny.

It seems that brie might have, unfortunately, bought into the idea that discrimination is not real.

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,753

@813,741 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Exactly the same thing occurred at Qualcomm last year. Cost them a measly $20 Million n of course the attorneys made out like bandits. In no way did it hurt the company stock.

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,795

@813,730 (brie !iFDoautiSM)

> i dont see the relevance.

you're a fucking nerd shut-in who probably hates women was the relevance

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,813

I heard that they were paid less on average because they get pay based on performance and on average they weren't as good

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,818

@813,795 (B)
damlol

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,820

@813,795 (B)
Brie does not hate women and you sound mad as fuck.

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,822

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Catherine, you must let brie fight his own battles. You cannot come charging in like a mad dog every time he is insulted.

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,826

@813,820 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
@previous (G)
yeah it's like when negi would defend autphag but a little less gross

Anonymous B double-posted this 9 years ago, 28 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,828

lol what if Catherine was Brie's income source

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,830

@previous (B)
Oh does Catherine have a job?

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,837

@previous (G)
does Brie? does negi? does autphag? does green?

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,838

@previous (B)
Of course not. So how could he be brie's source of income?

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,845

@previous (G)

> Of course not. So how could he be brie's source of income?

do you remember how negi was giving autphag his money
neither of them work
like that

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,892

@813,822 (G)
Some retard ignoring rule 8 is hardly a battle.

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,897

For the record, I don't hate women I just think the wage gap is a very persistent myth that needs to be dispelled. See below quote;

@813,813 (Sheila LaBoof)

> I heard that they were paid less on average because they get pay based on performance and on average they weren't as good

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,900

@previous (brie !iFDoautiSM)
In most situations sure, but it's not something I feel should be dismissed entirely.
It most likely happens somewhere, if this is a case of wage discrimination, that is up to the courts to decide.

But if the wage was based on performance then there should be no way that Google can lose.

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,902

@813,892 (brie !iFDoautiSM)
You know those were just lifted from Anontalk as a joke, right? They don't actually carry any weight.

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,941

@previous (G)

> You know those were just lifted from Anontalk as a joke, right? They don't actually carry any weight.

Read the FAQ, and maybe you should read the rules again: http://minichan.org/rules

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,943

@previous (brie !iFDoautiSM)
I'll FAQ your face!

brie !iFDoautiSM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,944

@previous (G)
I am fine with you frequently asking my face questions.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 28 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,961

3/100,000 is rampant sexism and unfair bias! How can this continue with these staggering numbers clearly showing an overwhelming number of women being discriminated against!

This is why we need antifa to smash windows and tip over trash cans! Damn the patriarchy

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,963

@previous (J)
This has nothing to do with Antifa.

Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,964

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
So you are a Nazi sympathizer. I thought so

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 35 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,965

@813,961 (J)
svet go to bed

Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,967

@previous (D)
> everyone is svet

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,972

@previous (J)
Well then please explain how you are dumb enough to not understand what a class action lawsuit means.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 9 years ago, 9 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,973

@813,964 (J)
How the fuck am I a Nazi sympathizer, you retard?

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #814,223

@813,967 (J)
@813,972 (D)
lol

Minichan