Minichan

Topic: I should start a new blog column.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 9 years ago #66,038

This is an idea I've had for years. Not sure if anyone here would be interested so consider this an opinion poll.

Sex Advise From A Virgin featuring Cathy Constantine

Here is your poll question:

Will you read such a column?

Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Yes. - 0%
No. 5 50%
Fuck you. - 0%
Shut up. 2 20%
Boners. - 0%
Sprite. 1 10%
Stop making shitty polls. 2 20%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #813,520

did you vote the bottom option in your own poll nonironically

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,524

@previous (B)

> did you vote the bottom option in your own poll nonironically

likely

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,526

@813,520 (B)
@previous (C)
All voting is confidential, you wouldn't ask someone on the street who they voted for during a presidential election or would you?

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 56 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,528

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
You have to know whether to punch them or not.

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 31 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,529

@813,526 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

> All voting is confidential, you wouldn't ask someone on the street who they voted for during a presidential election or would you?

no but I don't approach people on the street

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 56 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,530

@813,528 (Meta)
Sounds like that entire situation could be avoided if the person never bothered to ask the question of, "Who did you vote for?"

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,531

Anyone who approaches you on the street and asks you who you voted for probably isn't worth talking to anyway.

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #813,532

@813,530 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Are you saying Nazis shouldn't be punched?

Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,557

How does a Virgin give sex advise?
Nun

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,558

@previous (Syntax)
In the same way you give technology and engineering advice, one would presume. re: Google

Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #813,559

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Ya Ain't even intelligent nuff to use Google.

Ronald™ McDonald™ !ixspmD3f8A joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 37 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,584

The first thing to do is to learn the difference between "advise" and "advice".

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,590

@previous (Ronald™ McDonald™ !ixspmD3f8A)
Advise advice advize advic adviss

All sufficient.

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Ronald™ McDonald™ !ixspmD3f8A replied with this 9 years ago, 21 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,591

@previous (I)
Not for a writer.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,593

@previous (Ronald™ McDonald™ !ixspmD3f8A)
No one here gives a shit about writers or wrongers.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,641

@813,591 (Ronald™ McDonald™ !ixspmD3f8A)
The Rules of Grammar

"I am almost sure by witness of my ear, but cannot be positive, for I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules. A generation ago I knew the rules---knew them by heart, word for word, though not their meanings---and I still know one of them: the one which says---but never mind, it will come back to me presently."

"Great books are weighed and measured by their style and matter, and not the trimmings and shadings of their grammar."

"The Queen's English"
"There is no such thing as the Queen's English. The property has gone into the hands of a joint stock company and we own the bulk of the shares."

"SPELLING"

"I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing. I have a correspondent whose letters are always a refreshment to me, there is such a breezy unfettered originality about his orthography. He always spells Kow with a large K. Now that is just as good as to spell it with a small one. It is better. It gives the imagination a broader field, a wider scope. It suggests to the mind a grand, vague, impressive new kind of a cow."

"I have had an aversion to good spelling for sixty years and more, merely for the reason that when I was a boy there was not a thing I could do creditably except spell according to the book. It was a poor and mean distinction and I early learned to disenjoy it. I suppose that this is because the ability to spell correctly is a talent, not an acquirement. There is some dignity about an acquirement, because it is a product of your own labor. It is wages earned, whereas to be able to do a thing merely by the grace of God and not by your own effort transfers the distinction to our heavenly home---where possibly it is a matter of pride and satisfaction but it leaves you naked and bankrupt."

"I never had any large respect for good spelling. That is my feeling yet. Before the spelling-book came with its arbitrary forms, men unconsciously revealed shades of their characters and also added enlightening shades of expression to what they wrote by their spelling, and so it is possible that the spelling-book has been a doubtful benevolence to us."

"...ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred, borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft and preserving the memory of the revered crime."

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #813,649

But do you know much about sex?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.