Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 52 minutes later[^][v]#811,982
In many places, it is the law. A bag has to cover the label so the good, virtuous townspeople cannot see what you are doing. Not kidding.
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#811,988
@previous (B)
But it kind of defeats the purpose when wine is the ONLY item thus bagged.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#811,992
@previous (Meta)
No it does not. It hides the product.
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#811,993
@previous (B)
But if wine is the only product that's hidden, a hidden product must be wine.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#811,994
@previous (Meta)
Why so? If you see a paper bag, then it must be wine? There is an unlimited number of other products that could be in the bag. Why do you assume it is wine?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#811,996
It's good for people who want to date black women, people will assume you are drunk when actually it's just coca-cola.
carl !SkeGE7Y/fQ joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#812,003
@previous (C)
one trick i learned to survive in the ghetto was to replace 10-15% of every bottle of rum with coca-cola. that way you're drinking 10-15% less rum and risking 10-15% less alcohol poisoning after some punk challenges you to a rumoff in the streets
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#812,378
So that you can hide your being an alcholæ from your parents.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#812,380