Minichan

Topic: Screw the poor! Screw the old! Deport children!

Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #65,624

Fuck I hate Republicans. They are heartless monsters.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 28 minutes later[^] [v] #810,234

but they are a lesser evil than the everything is OK Democraps..

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #810,243

@previous (B)
I can't disagree with your statement!

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #810,245

Make this thread again, MAtt

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #810,258

@OP
Nice cuckpost.

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,267

@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I think it is.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,273

@810,234 (B)

> but they are a lesser evil than the everything is OK Democraps..

how is making more problems better than ignoring them

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,281

@previous (F)
Deporting problems is better than ignoring them

Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,285

@previous (G)
I think it is.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,290

@810,281 (G)
DACA recipients aren't "problems" except insofar as congressional inaction has led to the current situation by failing to pass the DREAM act in 2013. You should probably read up more on the program requirements. These are good hardworking people who through no fault of their own were thrust into an impossible situation and know no life other than life in America. Sending them back "home" is just creating a humanitarian crisis out of nothing for no purpose other than to seem "tough" on immigration. It doesn't materially benefit anyone.

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,293

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It benefits the damn taxpayers of America, you retard liberal shitforbrains.

Anonymous B double-posted this 9 years ago, 58 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,294

@previous (B)
And I mean that in a nice way.

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,295

@810,290 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> It doesn't materially benefit anyone.

Obviously these good hardworking people will benefit the country they are supposed to be in when they get there.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,297

@810,293 (B)
They pay taxes and can't collect welfare or take out student loans you dumbass. You are the biggest leech here anyway holy shit.

Uncle Sam replied with this 9 years ago, 29 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,298

@810,295 (G)
Bravo!
What we are really doing by deporting them is helping the country they came from. It's a humanitarian gesture.

(Edited 45 seconds later.)

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,299

@810,293 (B)
How does deporting people on track to become middle class taxpayers help taxpayers?

Uncle Sam replied with this 9 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,300

@810,297 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They don't pay social security tax.

(Edited 18 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 1 second later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,301

@810,295 (G)
How will they benefit the country they're "supposed to be in" when they may not speak any language other than English and have no concrete timeline of when they can even expect to be in that country? Do you even think before you type?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,302

@810,300 (Uncle Sam)
If they work they pay it, and their employers pay it too, but they will never have access to it. Not that it matters because everyone who is covered under DACA is like under 30 and won't be eligible to collect it for decades anyway.

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,305

We should just annex Mexico and get it over with already.

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,314

@810,297 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
This is accurate and Anonymous B is a goddamned retard.

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 26 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,318

@810,301 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You think good hardworking people are of no benefit to the country they are in. I on the other hand disagree. I just think that people who are not supposed to be somewhere because they are there illegally should have to leave. They of course can try to re-enter through correct legal channels just like everyone else though

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,325

@previous (G)
But they were brought here against their will with no choice in the matter as children. What were they supposed to do?

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,337

@previous (K)
It's not about what they were supposed to do then, it's about what has to happen now to remedy the situation.

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 35 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,388

@previous (G)
Legal remedy should be moral and proportional. Punishing minors for actions committed by their legal guardians does not have precedent. Wrecking the lives of these people is not proportional.

This is absurd and not backed by any reasonable framework. All that's left to defend this is naked bigotry.

Please, tell us more.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,393

@810,318 (G)
You accused me of holding the exact opposite opinion I stated clearly above. I think maybe you should work on coming up with arguments dude.

Anonymous K replied with this 9 years ago, 49 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #810,395

@810,388 (D)
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.