Minichan

Topic: left-wing equality

Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #64,651

Poverty for all people equally. No one can have more poverty than anyone else, because that's not fair.

beckyderp !yDoooooooo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #803,120

shut up retard

WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #803,122

@previous (beckyderp !yDoooooooo)
Statist decadence.

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 25 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #803,129

what's a statist

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 50 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #803,130

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
The opposite of an anarchist

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #803,134

@previous (E)
well you got to have rules

or else there's anarchy

--Kramer paraphrased

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #803,135

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Kramer should make a rule about not calling people niggers.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #803,136

Have you tried being rich for everybody instead of the shitty communist way of doing things?

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #803,138

@803,135 (E)
That was like ten years ago!

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #803,139

@803,136 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
what

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #803,140

@803,136 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

> Have you tried being rich for everybody

It has been tried, many times.

Meta double-posted this 9 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #803,141

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #803,143

@previous (Meta)
Not even useful for wiping ones ass.

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #803,144

@previous (I)
Yeah but everybody is a quadrillionaire ??

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,169

Venezuela is a left-wing paradise. Near total income equality.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,171

That is much, much worse than Capitalism, a system wherein a tiny percentage of inbred white people inherit 99% of the wealth without earning it, while the rest of the people work 20 hour days and barely get by.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,173

Externally hosted imagereminds me of this hilarious article that reads so perfectly like satire that i would think it were if not for the fact that it's fucking forbes

https://www.forbes.com/sites/harrybinswanger/2013/09/17/give-back-yes-its-time-for-the-99-to-give-back-to-the-1/#4d32814d70c5

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 21 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,175

liberalism...its a mental disorder..

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,198

@803,135 (E)
well those blacks

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,211

Margaret Thacher made the same point. The rich were getting richer but the poor were getting more benefits and better living conditions. The left at the time were pissed off, they hate the inequality and would be happy if everyone was just dirt poor together

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,213

@previous (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw)
can you name specific people who wanted that

it seems far fetched somehow

Anonymous K replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,215

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,216

@previous (K)
I suppose you know the background of that story-- you can look it up, besides, Elton John is a fag and those are not even boys, genoius

but wait that's a whole new topic-- make a new thread

I have unrelated pics too, here's one

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,217

@803,213 (Sheila LaBoof)
Pretty much the entire labour party of the 80s and especially their leader Neil Kinnock

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,218

@previous (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw)
really. they said that, are you sure. did they not want the job of running the country because come on, what kind of platform is that

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 10 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,304

@803,169 (A)

> Venezuela is a left-wing paradise. Near total income equality.

that's not what paradise means

Meta double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,305

@803,211 (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw)

> The rich were getting richer but the poor were getting more benefits and better living conditions. The left at the time were pissed off,
lmao oh boy yeah this happens

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #803,310

@803,215 (K)
What the fuck

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 5 months later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #849,147

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What the fuck indeed!

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 55 minutes later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #849,154

@803,218 (Sheila LaBoof)
Ofc they wanted to run the country but they wanted to massively tax the city of London and self employed trades people so they could over bloat the public sector which would have then restricted growth in boom areas and caused a deeper recession when hard times hit because the private sectors taxes wouldn't be able to cover the public sectors budget.

$anta joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #849,156

with $anta in da house everybody's happy.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #849,172

participation trophies..

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #849,173

@previous (Q)

Anonymous E replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #849,280

@previous (R)
lol

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 8 months later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #917,558

@803,120 (beckyderp !yDoooooooo)

> shut up retard

no u

Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 8 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #917,589

@OP

> Poverty for all people equally. No one can have more poverty than anyone else, because that's not fair.

Communist

Anonymous M replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #917,630

@803,136 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

> Have you tried being rich for everybody instead of the shitty communist way of doing things?

love it

MRS DEBORAH JAMES replied with this 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #917,754

@803,138 (Meta)
Your numbers don't add up on the blow
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.