beckyderp !yDoooooooo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later[^][v]#802,657
I think a lot fewer babies were killed before surgical means of abortion were discovered. How could it be otherwise?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#802,659
@previous (beckyderp !yDoooooooo)
I guess I forgot to take into account diseases and other killers of humans, but whatever, we're just looking at abortion.
beckyderp !yDoooooooo replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#802,660
@previous (A)
I'm not sure what you're asking
Non-invasive, non-surgical means of abortion were rather ineffective
So more dead abortion babies now
Right?
Or are you asking whether more babies were killed after birth too?
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#802,662
@previous (beckyderp !yDoooooooo)
That makes sense I guess. I just thought there would have been more botched abortions before surgical leading to more babies dead.
dreamworks !ea7At1rwaI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#802,664
unwanted pregnancies were often brought to term and the baby would be killed or abandoned before proper abortions and in places where abortions safe or otherwise aren't accessible
weird question