Minichan

Topic: Does 'Multiple Discovery' apply to works of art?

Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #64,592

I've heard of there being people who as soon as they put an idea to paper or say something out loud it's "stolen" by someone. Are these ideas really being stolen or did someone else just come up with it at the same time?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #802,574

Do all works of art belong to any one basic ontological category? Do all or only some works have multiple instances? Do works have (material) parts or constituents, and if so, what is their relation to the work as a whole? How are particular works of art individuated? Are they created or discovered? Can they be destroyed?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #802,576

If a work of art is discovered as opposed to created does this point to the Universe being a consciousness?

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #802,578

@previous (A)
The word "create" means to go from nothing to something. To go from an absence of anything to something of complexity is rare because many who do this derive from other's work. They are appropriators.

> Universe being a consciousness

Do you believe consciousness emanates from matter? Such as the firing of neurons inside the brain. Take the brain out of the equation and consciousness doesn’t exist at all. Since the Universe is comprised of matter and energy as well as living brains, only a small part of the Universe has consciousness.

My brain just locked up on my last paragraph.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #802,580

@previous (B)
It may be easier (but perhaps inaccurate) to call the Universe God. Is there a such thing as divine inspiration? Does God take ideas back and give them to others if they are squandered?

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #802,581

@previous (A)
God? In my opinion that is a subject better left to those who worship Satan.

dreamworks !ea7At1rwaI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #802,606

@802,580 (A)
no, tard

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 37 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #802,613

@802,580 (A)
> Is there a such thing as divine inspiration?

Given omniscience, there is just divine appropriation.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.