Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 44 minutes later[^][v]#801,099
Since somewhere last year
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,131
I admire the fact that he uses kids to make a lot of money but the guy is a tool.
dreamworks skg. llc joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,146
he gives me the fucking creeps
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 41 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,161
I liked him better when he showed more people that the Wall Street Journal is not to be trusted, but I don't feel like watching some guy shriek incessently so I haven't looked lately
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,188
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Yeah he deserves some props for inadvertently outing WSJ as fake news.
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,191
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,194
@previous (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
Yes it is. See also their Pewdiepie article
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,199
@previous (B)
WSJ is a fine publication, and is not fake news. "Pewdiepie" is hardly a valid academic source.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,200
@previous (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
He isn't the source, he's the subject. That article is something you'd expect to see in the Daily Mail. You also don't need to be an academic to see information is falsely presented.
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,203
@previous (B)
Would you be so kind as to link me to the article?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 39 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,210
@801,199 (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
The Wall Street Journal editorials for decades have been pig ignorant, stupid, and even anti-freedom. Their straight news work has a reputation for being more professional than their retarded editorials, but the PewDiePie article was a straight-up dishonest hit piece that read like a student campus activist rant about some comedian being a monster for rape jokes or something like that.
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM replied with this 9 years ago, 27 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,222
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Do you have a link to the article, peradventure?
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,251
@801,203 (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
Google pewdiepie wsj
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,263
@801,222 (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
no I looked at it and then I didnt't save a link because I don't want to look at it again
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,265
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Translation: "There is no such article and I made it all up."
Thanks
brie !kiTty82duI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#801,267