Minichan

Topic: why does google give me homosexual propaganda when i google pansexuality??

Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #63,640

Externally hosted image

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #795,027

Isn't homosexuality a subset of pansexuality?

Also I thought the rainbow was meant to encompass everything on the LGBTTQQIAAP spectrum.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #795,028

The gays don't want a little mom pop and pop store...they want a mall..

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 21 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #795,030

@previous (C)
Full of Christian wedding cake shops.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,032

@795,027 (Meta)
i was using homosexual to mean anything other than straight in the title. it also happens when you google homosexuality.

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,035

@previous (A)
Seriously though what's the deal with pansexuals? Can you really be sexually attracted to everyone?!

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,039

@previous (Meta)
when queer marriage was deemed permissable by scotus...people said shit like...the next thing you know folks will want to marry their dog..

and the addition of these terms like pansexuality and whatever else the freaks dream up next...demonstrate thats the absurd type of lunacy that we are headed for..

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,040

@795,035 (Meta)
they are saying they are attracted to people but not based on sex or gender

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,042

@previous (A)
That's disgusting

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,044

@795,039 (C)
Why stop at dogs? Why shouldn't Clyde be able to gay-marry his turtle?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,046

@795,042 (D)
why do you believe that?

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,047

@795,040 (A)
So just a fancy way of saying bisexual?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 13 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,048

@795,044 (Meta)
stop assuming the turtle's gender please

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,050

@795,047 (Meta)
there's probably some differences but yeah pretty much

Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 9 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,052

they should have kkk flags when you google white supremacy

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,054

@795,050 (A)
That's disgusting too

Anonymous D double-posted this 9 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #795,055

@795,052 (A)
Wow, super disgusted.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 36 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,064

@795,047 (Meta)
bisexual = men and women
pansexual = regardless of gender or sex
the difference there being the gender binary factor i think

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,065

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I read both as "I could be attracted to either men or women".

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,066

@previous (Meta)
a pansexual could also be attracted to someone who identifies as neither

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,067

@795,065 (Meta)
like i said, gender binary factor
if that is something you believe in then both terms will be identical to you
if that is something you do not believe in then they will mean different things

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 59 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,068

@795,066 (A)
But what if their gender wasn't on the male-female spectrum. What if their gender was a walrus or something?

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,069

@previous (Meta)
> a walrus
what?
and that is kind of the point

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,070

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I mean instead of masculine or feminine, their gender was a walrus. Or prime numbers. Or petroleum. Why can't hydrocarbons be a gender?

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,073

@previous (Meta)
... ok.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 28 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,075

@795,068 (Meta)
no one's gender is a walrus though

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,083

@previous (A)
But what if it was?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,087

@previous (Meta)
not sure

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,111

OP
Google Peterpan sexuality.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,118

@previous (F)
why?

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,127

@previous (A)
Looks like you are looking for something-anything to justify what has become of you.

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,134

pansexuality..


special snowflakism..

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,146

@795,127 (F)
at what point in this thread did i say i am pansexual? why would i google it if i was?

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 24 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,168

@previous (A)
Why did you Google it?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,174

@previous (F)
to find out what the actual definiton was.

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 31 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,190

@795,083 (Meta)

> But what if it was?

sorry everyone. I'm retarded

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,201

@795,065 (Meta)
There is no difference

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,206

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
in your opinion

edit- i agree though

(Edited 47 seconds later.)

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 45 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,212

@previous (A)
Think about it though. People think that person has a dick/vagina and I want to fuck them. Not that person is bigender/gender neutral/gender fluid and I want to fuck them.
Unless we need a specific term for people who will stick their dick in crazy (trannies).

brie !kiTty82duI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,220

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You don't think we do?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,223

@795,212 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
when you say crazy, do you legitimately believe that being transgender is a mental ilness?

Captain Jack Harkness joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,225

@795,035 (Meta)
If you only knew...

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,238

@795,223 (A)
Yes

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,240

@previous (D)
why?

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 27 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,242

@previous (A)
You are disgusting

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,245

@795,220 (brie !kiTty82duI)
No I dont

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 9 years ago, 55 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,246

@795,223 (A)
Gender dysphoria is a mental illness and tends to coexist with other mental illnesses

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,252

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

actually conclusive research hasnt been done yet

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,258

@previous (A)
Okay...

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,259

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
it's just semantics anyway. but why do you think this?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 30 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,264

@previous (A)
Because any kind of body dysmorphia is a mental illness that causes perception issues. Both manifests in negative symptoms caused by cognitive dissonance

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,266

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
but gender is largely social and not biological

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,269

@previous (A)

> but gender is largely social and not biological

If that were true, trannies wouldnt exist. Getting triggered when you're reminded that you have a dick has nothing to do with gender.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,270

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
can you hold a normal conversation without just doing memes??

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 39 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,271

@previous (A)
I didnt do a meme?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #795,272

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
ok then pls elaborate

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #795,331

@previous (A)
On what?

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #795,335

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

On why Getting triggered when you're reminded that you have a dick has nothing to do with gender doy

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #795,355

@previous (K)
Because changing your gender doesnt stop that. You can completely switch all of your gender presentation and still have dysphoria because you didnt change your sex.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #795,356

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Exactly

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 8 months later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #872,642

@795,035 (Meta)
I still don't understand the difference between a bisexual and a pansexual.

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #872,644

@previous (A)
Me neither. I think it's for people who are bisexual but want to sound cool.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 58 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #872,656

@872,642 (A)
It must mean that one will f7ck trannies

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 1 day later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,156

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Wouldn't that fall under bisexual though?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,161

@previous (Meta)
No because they just need their own category

Meta replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,166

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Bisexual already means "I'll take penis and/or vagina" though.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,168

@previous (Meta)
Yes but most people dont want a woman with a dick hanging off or vice versa

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,172

@795,212 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Do you really think 'this person has a vagina and I want to fuck them'? That's weird

@872,642 (A)
Pansexual includes gender non conforming people, nonbinary people

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,176

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
does bisexuality exclude that??

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,180

@873,172 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Do you really think "this person is gender neutral, I want to fuck them?" Most people pick a partner from their preferred set of genitalia

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 21 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,191

@873,176 (A)
Afaik yes

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Gender and genitalia just...don't come into it at all for me

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,202

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Well most people do have a preference

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,218

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Idk I just don't understand caring about what's in people's pants

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 39 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,222

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Well you are an outlier and most men dont want to suck dick

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 8 years ago, 39 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,230

They are using the Roy G. Biv flag because it also represents the LGBT+ community and that includes pansexuality.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 13 hours later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,358

@873,222 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
really
i feel like i know very few men who would not be down to suck dick

Grrrrrr replied with this 8 years ago, 20 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,365

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Girl you just live around some strange men.

Cocksucking is a disgusting idea in my book. Unless it is a girl doing it for me of course. And I mean a real girl and not some chick with a dick.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,366

@previous (Grrrrrr)
why is it disgusting if it's not a girl sucking your dick

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 months after the original post[^] [v] #873,369

@873,358 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I 100% believe you
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.