Topic: So did you guys ever actually prove gravity exists?
brie !kiTty82duI started this discussion 9 years ago #63,382
Can you still not prove it?
I will be dismissing any evidence you show, but you can't even show any.
I will be dismissing any evidence you show, but you can't even show any.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #792,967
The Earth is flat! You can't even show any evidence I won't dismiss
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,970
@OP
> I will be dismissing any evidence you show
That's a silly and ignorant position to take. Open your mind a little.
> I will be dismissing any evidence you show
That's a silly and ignorant position to take. Open your mind a little.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 15 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,971
@792,967 (B)
Yes, the earth is flat and it is moving in an upwards direction which makes it appear as if gravity exists, but it doesn't.
Yes, the earth is flat and it is moving in an upwards direction which makes it appear as if gravity exists, but it doesn't.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,972
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 23 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,974
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 17 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,975
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,977
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 23 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,978
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,979
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,981
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,983
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,985
@previous (B)
So your belief in things is based entirely on my posting proof of them? How did I acquire so much power and influence over you?
So your belief in things is based entirely on my posting proof of them? How did I acquire so much power and influence over you?
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,987
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,990
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,995
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 29 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,997
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,000
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,009
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 33 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,011
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 45 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,012
Wow if you retards can't even prove gravity exists, how do you expect to be able to prove the moon landings?
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 32 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,014
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 19 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,015
Anonymous C double-posted this 9 years ago, 22 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,017
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 53 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,020
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,027
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,030
@previous (C)
If you could prove it, you would have provided even a single shred of evidence so far. Since you have thus far shown no evidence, I can safely conclude that you have none and are incapable of producing any.
If you could prove it, you would have provided even a single shred of evidence so far. Since you have thus far shown no evidence, I can safely conclude that you have none and are incapable of producing any.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 41 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,032
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> If you could prove it, you would have provided even a single shred of evidence so far.
Why do you think this?
> If you could prove it, you would have provided even a single shred of evidence so far.
Why do you think this?
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,036
@previous (C)
It would be illogical for you to be posting in this topic if you didn't want to prove gravity exists.
So you want to prove it, but you can't, thus no evidence. Thanks.
It would be illogical for you to be posting in this topic if you didn't want to prove gravity exists.
So you want to prove it, but you can't, thus no evidence. Thanks.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,037
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
Then by extension it is illogical for you to be posting here if you didn't want to prove it.
Then by extension it is illogical for you to be posting here if you didn't want to prove it.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,038
@previous (C)
No, you see, I am the OP.
I can't prove gravity exists because it doesn't.
I want to see you try to prove it.
No, you see, I am the OP.
I can't prove gravity exists because it doesn't.
I want to see you try to prove it.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 36 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,039
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> I can't prove gravity exists because it doesn't.
Why do you think this?
> I can't prove gravity exists because it doesn't.
Why do you think this?
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 47 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,040
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 29 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,041
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,045
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 53 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,046
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
All words are 'made up', retard. I'm asking you what you think the word denotes.
All words are 'made up', retard. I'm asking you what you think the word denotes.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,048
@previous (C)
All words are made up but most of them actually mean something. Gravity is pure gobbledygook.
All words are made up but most of them actually mean something. Gravity is pure gobbledygook.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,050
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 37 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,051
10/10 This is almost like having mountainman back.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 53 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,053
@793,050 (C)
Look, you seem to be an educated person, and you don't even know what gravity is, let alone are you able to prove it's existence.
What makes you think anybody can prove it if someone as smart as you can't even do it?
Look, you seem to be an educated person, and you don't even know what gravity is, let alone are you able to prove it's existence.
What makes you think anybody can prove it if someone as smart as you can't even do it?
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 58 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,054
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> you don't even know what gravity is, let alone are you able to prove it's existence.
Why do you think this?
> you don't even know what gravity is, let alone are you able to prove it's existence.
Why do you think this?
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,055
@previous (C)
Because you don't seem to know anything about this "gravity" and you have posted no proof and not a single piece of evidence.
Do you have proof or not?
Because you don't seem to know anything about this "gravity" and you have posted no proof and not a single piece of evidence.
Do you have proof or not?
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,058
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
How can I post proof of something you have said is a meaningless word? You are literally asking for proof of nothing, which you have duly received. You are welcome.
How can I post proof of something you have said is a meaningless word? You are literally asking for proof of nothing, which you have duly received. You are welcome.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 50 seconds later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,059
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 21 seconds later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #793,060
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,062
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,063
@previous (C)
To make your conclusion, that i am asking for proof of nothing, you first have to concede that there is no such thing as gravity and the word has no meaning.
If you do not agree with that then your conclusion that you have provided proof does not follow.
To make your conclusion, that i am asking for proof of nothing, you first have to concede that there is no such thing as gravity and the word has no meaning.
If you do not agree with that then your conclusion that you have provided proof does not follow.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,064
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> To make your conclusion, that i am asking for proof of nothing, you first have to concede that there is no such thing as gravity and the word has no meaning.
Quite a slow brain you have there eh? Here let me walk you through it again: you want proof of gravity, and when asked what you mean by gravity, you said gravity is nothing. Hence, you are asking for proof of nothing. You have duly received proof of nothing. Understand? Still too fast for you?
> To make your conclusion, that i am asking for proof of nothing, you first have to concede that there is no such thing as gravity and the word has no meaning.
Quite a slow brain you have there eh? Here let me walk you through it again: you want proof of gravity, and when asked what you mean by gravity, you said gravity is nothing. Hence, you are asking for proof of nothing. You have duly received proof of nothing. Understand? Still too fast for you?
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,065
@previous (C)
I said that in reality gravity is nothing, but you are living in a delusion.
I said that in reality gravity is nothing, but you are living in a delusion.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,067
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> I sad that in reality gravity is nothing
And in reality you have received proof of that.
> I sad that in reality gravity is nothing
And in reality you have received proof of that.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,068
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,070
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> Exactly. You have proved nothing. Thanks.
Nothing being your conception of gravity. You are welcome.
> Exactly. You have proved nothing. Thanks.
Nothing being your conception of gravity. You are welcome.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,071
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,072
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,073
@previous (C)
Contrary to my standpoint. It was a perfectly cromulent sentence. You really aren't very bright, are you?
This guy can't even parse english, I don't know why I expect him to be able to prove a single thing.
Contrary to my standpoint. It was a perfectly cromulent sentence. You really aren't very bright, are you?
This guy can't even parse english, I don't know why I expect him to be able to prove a single thing.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,076
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> Contrary to my standpoint.
Your standpoint is that gravity doesn't exist and that gravity is nothing. I have therefore done as you asked and proven nothing. Again: you are welcome.
> Contrary to my standpoint.
Your standpoint is that gravity doesn't exist and that gravity is nothing. I have therefore done as you asked and proven nothing. Again: you are welcome.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,083
@previous (C)
Again, thank you for proving absolutely nothing while you are trying to prove the existence of gravity.
My point stands, there is not a single person on this forum capable of proving it exists.
The best you can do is agree with me that it doesn't exist.
Again, thank you for proving absolutely nothing while you are trying to prove the existence of gravity.
My point stands, there is not a single person on this forum capable of proving it exists.
The best you can do is agree with me that it doesn't exist.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,086
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> Again, thank you for proving absolutely nothing while you are trying to prove the existence of gravity.
Which, according to you, are synonyms. Once more: you are welcome.
> Again, thank you for proving absolutely nothing while you are trying to prove the existence of gravity.
Which, according to you, are synonyms. Once more: you are welcome.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,087
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,090
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
As you defined them, yes, of course. It's unavoidable, in fact it's not even a question of agreement, it's only the train of logic.
As you defined them, yes, of course. It's unavoidable, in fact it's not even a question of agreement, it's only the train of logic.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,092
@previous (C)
Alight, well then, congratulations! You are so close to proving the existence of gravity, so close.
All you have to do now is show that nothing is something. Then you've done it!
Alight, well then, congratulations! You are so close to proving the existence of gravity, so close.
All you have to do now is show that nothing is something. Then you've done it!
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,094
@793,090 (C)
You, of course are required to go by my definition since there is no other definition. Because it doesn't exist, the word is made up, isn't in any dictionary and you can disprove none of that because you are a retard.
lol
You, of course are required to go by my definition since there is no other definition. Because it doesn't exist, the word is made up, isn't in any dictionary and you can disprove none of that because you are a retard.
lol
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,095
@793,092 (brie !kiTty82duI)
> All you have to do now is show that nothing is something.
But that would then be the opposite of what you were asking. You wanted proof of nothing. Nothing is not something. Hence, proof of something would not be proof of gravity. Are you really still struggling with the logic here?
> All you have to do now is show that nothing is something.
But that would then be the opposite of what you were asking. You wanted proof of nothing. Nothing is not something. Hence, proof of something would not be proof of gravity. Are you really still struggling with the logic here?
Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,096
maybe OP...has...or has not...seen THIS:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4047500/Was-Einstein-WRONG-gravity-Controversial-new-theory-rewrite-physics-passes-test.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4047500/Was-Einstein-WRONG-gravity-Controversial-new-theory-rewrite-physics-passes-test.html
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,097
@793,095 (C)
What I'm struggling to understand is why you are arguing that gravity doesn't exist when I asked for proof that it does.
If you agree with me that it doesn't exist, which you have already done several time, then what are you trying to prove?
What I'm struggling to understand is why you are arguing that gravity doesn't exist when I asked for proof that it does.
If you agree with me that it doesn't exist, which you have already done several time, then what are you trying to prove?
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,100
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> I asked for proof that it does.
And I provided it for you by providing proof of nothing.
I'm not sure I've ever come across someone quite so amazingly slow as you.
> I asked for proof that it does.
And I provided it for you by providing proof of nothing.
I'm not sure I've ever come across someone quite so amazingly slow as you.
Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,101
Itt:
non scientists babble vociferously about science stuff..
non scientists babble vociferously about science stuff..
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #793,102
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,106
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> You didn't prove anything. Which is not the same as proving nothing.
That is correct. And it was proof of nothing you asked for.
Incidentally I'm proud of you for practising elemetary logic and letting us all see your working out. Keep it up.
> You didn't prove anything. Which is not the same as proving nothing.
That is correct. And it was proof of nothing you asked for.
Incidentally I'm proud of you for practising elemetary logic and letting us all see your working out. Keep it up.
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,116
I ask for proof of gravity and all anyone can do is agree with me that it doesn't exist.
Is there a single person on this fourm who can show that there is such a thing as gravity?
At this point I think it's safe to say nobody can.
Is there a single person on this fourm who can show that there is such a thing as gravity?
At this point I think it's safe to say nobody can.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,118
@previous (brie !kiTty82duI)
> At this point I think it's safe to say nobody can.
Why do you think that?
> At this point I think it's safe to say nobody can.
Why do you think that?
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,119
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,122
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,124
@previous (C)
> Because I want to know
Well to answer your question, it's been over two hours and not a single person can prove that there is such a thing as gravity. That is why I think that.
> Because I want to know
Well to answer your question, it's been over two hours and not a single person can prove that there is such a thing as gravity. That is why I think that.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,125
matter = energy = gravity
this proves nothing
this proves nothing
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,130
brie !kiTty82duI (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,132
@previous (C)
You argued the non-existence of gravity, actually.
Since it is clear that nobody has any evidence or proof, I will be off to surf my ocean a blue.
Toodles! ---------------->
You argued the non-existence of gravity, actually.
Since it is clear that nobody has any evidence or proof, I will be off to surf my ocean a blue.
Toodles! ---------------->
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,134
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,139
when a ball rises and falls in the ballsack that is gravity but it is also muscles
(Edited 6 seconds later.)
Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 19 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,345
itt: no gravitons
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,347
Proof isApple when it leaves the branch of tree - Apple does not remain stationary nor does it rise upwards
If this tree were on a planet with zero gravity the apple wood never fall
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 36 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,351
So do gravity exist or not?