Topic: So did you guys ever actually prove the moon landing?

Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #63,380

Last time I was here I remember a few of you were squabbling about whether the moon landings in 1969 were faked. Someone (me I think) said they were faked, and a small tense group got angry and started saying they were real but couldn't post evidence for the claim. Did you ever actually post the evidence, or can you still not prove it?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #792,881

The bible is enough evidence for me.

brie !kiTty82duI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,883

Evidence is on the moon. Please shine a powerful laser at the moon for proof.

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,885

lol

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,886

OP
People are still squabbling about a Rabbi hung out to dry on a Roman Cross.
People are still squabbling about Towel Heads choice of going for 72 Virgins or some alternative.
People are still squabbling about the Chicken first or Egg even though science has settled that.

"The Moon is made of green cheese" was one of the most popular proverbs in 16th and 17th-century English literature"

What we do not know is: Did the astronauts take crackers to the surface to scoop up some of the Green Cheese for appetizers.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,887

Yes you were shown photographic evidence

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,896

is the moon, like, even really there

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,898

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Often at night when you look up at the sky, no moon.
Proof it is not always there. Much like wet dreams. Sometimes they are sometime not.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,899

@792,887 (F)

> photographic evidence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxymoron

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,900

@792,881 (B)

> The bible is enough evidence for me.

Me too. It's the only source of truth.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,902

Of course not, humans never went to the moon. The reptilians did, but only because their moon man allies gave them permission.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,903

@792,900 (A)
Can you explain who the children of Adam and Eve had sex with?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,904

@previous (J)
www.tinychan.org <---- please ask all your questions about children having sex over there. Thanks.

(Edited 40 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,905

@792,902 (I)

> Of course not, humans never went to the moon.

This guy gets it.

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,906

@792,899 (A)
Why do you think the moon landing was faked?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,907

@previous (F)
Because there is no conclusive evidence pointing to the contrary

Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,908

@792,905 (A)
It's not because we didn't have the means, it was those moon men.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,909

@previous (I)
Preach brother, preach

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,910

@792,907 (A)

> Because there is no conclusive evidence pointing to the contrary

where's the conclusive evidence of absence

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,911

@792,908 (I)
Can you explain who the descendants over the age of 18 of Adam and Eve; who did they have sex with?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,912

@previous (K)
With other people.

Your question is weird.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,913

@792,910 (Meta)

> > Because there is no conclusive evidence pointing to the contrary
>
> where's the conclusive evidence of absence

"conclusive evidence of absence" of what?

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,918

@792,907 (A)
What about the photographs? Can you see any signs of doctoring?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,919

@previous (F)
Yes

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,921

@OP
Are you a young earther, or a flat earther?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,923

@previous (L)
No

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,925

Coming up with unfounded stories to deny all the evidence for something is fun. You can it with anything, which makes it seem like thinly veiled nihilism.

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,927

@792,923 (A)
Chem trails mind control or Flouride water mind control?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,928

@792,925 (M)

> Coming up with unfounded stories to deny all the evidence for something is fun.

Fun but dumb. Don't do it.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 20 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,929

@792,927 (L)
Needs elaboration

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,930

@792,907 (A)
> Because there is no conclusive evidence pointing to the contrary

You offer no conclusive evidence the stories in the bible are true.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,932

@previous (E)
And your point is?

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,933

@792,928 (A)
Egg Zachary

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,934

@792,930 (E)
Lots of significant scientific evidence of multiple trips to the moon.
Zero scientific evidence the stories in the bible are true.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,937

Anon E has lost his little mind and has begun arguing with himself. No wonder he believes in the moon landings.

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,941

@previous (A)
Did the Jews do 9/11?

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,942

@792,937 (A)
LoL
Hey you are free to believe in God Allah and the Tooth Fairy. I make my living with science and space stuff.
Wayyyy back then I did a lot of ham radio stuff and anyone was free to make a simple S band antenna and down covert the orbiter and moon landing signals and none of it was encrypted -

But I do not want to really make you upset cause you are here just playing which is what we ham radio geeks did back then to enjoy are tech skills. So you keep enjoying your game - However if you really believe in all those bible stories - Good luck and please do not pray for me cause Jesus tried that on the cross and look how that failed when he asked God why

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,943

@previous (E)
OP doesn't believe in dadrock either

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,944

@792,942 (E)
You're getting a bit upset. Try to calm down. You can continue to believe in your moon landing stories if it helps you.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,945

@792,941 (L)
No

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 48 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,946

@previous (A)
Do you have any evidence to support that?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,947

@previous (L)
Sure

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,948

@792,943 (L)
Dadrock has been beaten to death around here. Once someone lists the bands of my youth and calls them dadrock someone else much younger will point out they love that band. I have Old rock new rock Hip Hop but not much heavy metal on my Sandisk player.

I figure Allah and God listen to Dadrock but Mohammad wood have problems with such music

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 39 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,949

@792,947 (A)
Can you post the evidence?

Anonymous L double-posted this 9 years ago, 59 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,950

@792,948 (E)
OP also has an autistic reaction to dadrock

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,951

@792,919 (A)
Which?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,952

@792,949 (L)
Sure, but to save your time, be more specific about which evidence you want. Your claim ("The Jews did 9/11") is nebulously vague.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,953

@792,951 (F)
Which what?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,955

@792,952 (A)
Post evidence that the Jews did not do 9/11. Or can you not prove it?

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,956

@792,953 (A)
Which signs of doctoring are there

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,958

@previous (F)
Christopher Eccleston doctored OP

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,959

@792,955 (L)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden

Note the ethnicity.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,960

@792,956 (F)
You'd need to post a picture and I'll tell you

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,964

@792,959 (A)
You have no proof Osama bin laden did 9/11

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,968

@previous (L)
Why do you think this?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 18 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,969

@previous (A)
Post the proof

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,973

@previous (L)
First things first, answer the question: why did you think that?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,976

@previous (A)
Because you haven't posted any proof

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,980

@previous (L)
You didn't ask for any, dipshit. It's traditional to first ask for evidence before concluding someone doesn't have any. You jumped to a conclusion before following the intermediary steps of logic, evidence and reasoning. This is what credulous idiots do. Now I see why you believe everything you see in photographs.

Now then, what exactly is it you want proof of this time? Be specific.

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,982

@previous (A)
That Osama bin laden is responsible for 9/11

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,984

@previous (L)
Define 9/11

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,986

@previous (A)
You obviously know what it is, as you have already attempted to post evidence that the Jews did not do it. Thanks

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,988

@previous (L)
So if I already posted evidence, why are you still asking for evidence? You're a tad slow-witted aren't you?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 58 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,991

@previous (A)
*Attempted

There is no proof Osama bin laden was involved

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 57 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,993

@previous (L)

> There is no proof Osama bin laden was involved

Can you prove this?

squeegee joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 18 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,994

OP's paper is due, don't do his research for him, if he wants access to primary sources and evidence then he needs to do the work to understand it himself. why OP thinks anyone here wants to tutor him for free is anyone's guess.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 40 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,996

@previous (squeegee)
Can you prove the moon landings were not faked?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,999

@792,993 (A)
You have no proof, because Osama bin laden was not involved? Thanks for proving Jews did 9/11. Thanks

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,007

@previous (L)
You seem to be having a conversation with yourself again. Pay attention now. Once more:

@792,993 (A)

> > There is no proof Osama bin laden was involved
>
> Can you prove this?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 50 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,010

@previous (A)
So you can't. Thanks, that'll be all.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,013

@previous (L)
Looks like I've backed you into a corner. All too easy.

Anyone else want to try and do what Anon L couldn't and prove the moon landings weren't faked?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 59 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,018

@previous (A)
So Jews did 9/11, until you can prove otherwise.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,019

@previous (L)

> So Jews did 9/11

Third time lucky perhaps: can you prove this?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,023

@previous (A)
The burden of proof is on you.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,026

@previous (L)
You're making the claim, retard. Hence the burden of proof is on you. That's how it works. Good lord you are quite a dimwit aren't you? No wonder you believe the moon landings weren't faked and the Jews did 9/11.

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,028

@previous (A)
The moon landings were faked. Jews did 9/11. No proof to the contrary has been posted

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,031

@previous (L)

> The moon landings were faked.

Glad I've convinced you on that.

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,066

@792,913 (A)

> > > Because there is no conclusive evidence pointing to the contrary
> >
> > where's the conclusive evidence of absence
>
> "conclusive evidence of absence" of what?

Of humans on the moon retard this is your thread

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,069

@previous (Meta)
You want evidence of absence of humans on the moon? Do you also perchance require evidence of absence of humans on Saturn?

squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,074

@792,996 (A)
dude, i'm not even interested in telling you where you can go to find the proof for yourself, of course i'm not going to offer any explanations to you. i don't care if you flunk your classes or not.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,077

@previous (squeegee)
So you can't prove it. Ok thanks, that'll be all.

squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,079

@previous (A)
nice try, but i'm not retarded. do your homework.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,082

@previous (squeegee)

> nice try, but i'm not retarded.

You keep on telling yourself that, Champ, one day you'll show the world!

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,084

sure there are pics..

but you know how the gubberment always keeps cutting edge techie stuff under wraps from the general public for a bit...then releases it later on..

maybe they could photoshoppe back then..

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..

squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 28 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,099

@793,082 (A)
i'm not the one who doesn't believe in the moon landings

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,103

@previous (squeegee)
As I said, you'll show the world one day.

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,117

@793,069 (A)
> Do you also perchance require evidence of absence of humans on Saturn?
No, because no one is claiming that happened. You need to work on making valid comparisons.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,120

@previous (M)

> > Do you also perchance require evidence of absence of humans on Saturn?
> No, because no one is claiming that happened. You need to work on making valid comparisons.

'Evidence of absence' is an unprovable proposition regardless of the specifics. You need to work on not being a retard.

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,126

@previous (A)
> 'Evidence of absence' is an unprovable proposition regardless of the specifics.

I'm pretty sure I could satisfactorily prove that there isn't a full grown elephant in my oven or prove that some numbers are not present in a given set. I think the specifics matter. But that's a cute way to dodge criticism of your shitty comparisons.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,129

to the universal troll: matter is dead, god is dead, you are gonna die

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,131

@793,126 (M)

> > 'Evidence of absence' is an unprovable proposition regardless of the specifics.
>
> I'm pretty sure I could satisfactorily prove that there isn't a full grown elephant in my oven

Go on then.

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,137

@previous (A)
I just put some dinner in. I didn't see any full grown elephants. I don't think one would fit in there anyway.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,143

@previous (M)

> I just put some dinner in. I didn't see any full grown elephants.

You believe everything you see? This is a mistake. The human eye cannot detect everything and can occasionally be tricked. If you're old enough to be making your own dinner you ought to know this already. You don't seem very bright I'm afraid.

Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 16 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,144

there are pink elefphants on the big pig pig moon, there is scientific pR00f for that. everybody know that right ?

(Edited 45 seconds later.)

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,151

@793,143 (A)
> You believe everything you see? This is a mistake.
Yes, I trust my senses would be able be to detect a full grown elephant in my oven. I take the fact that I have failed to do so as evidence that there isn't one there.

You're sliding into nihilism again. It was more fun when you were playing semantics.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,153

@previous (M)

> >You believe everything you see? This is a mistake.
> Yes, I trust my senses would be able be to detect a full grown elephant in my oven.

Then you're a fool. Anon P for example is seeing pink elephants on the moon. There are people who see angels, flying saucers, God, the devil, elephants in their ovens. All using their eyes. Who is right, you or them?

Also, I'm still waiting for you to post proof that there is no elephant in your oven. If you can't do it, no problem, though frankly I'm surprised I was able to destroy your belief system so effortlessly.

Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,155

@previous (A)
Of course there is no elephant in his oven. He cooked it and served it to his family for dinner.

Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,156

if their are pink elephants on the moon, what would there exists on the hot surface of the sun .. what would there be in the galaxy ... oh GOD OH GOD ... what would there be in the universe. I think on the universe is just on big can of schweppes with bubbles. OK now i will pray to schweppes, and don't destroy my belief system. plz. Unless you wannabe a child molestorr

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,161

@793,153 (A)
I've proven it to myself satisfactorily, and my belief system is quite intact. I see no need to indulge you.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,163

@previous (M)

> I've proven it to myself satisfactorily

So you can't submit it to others for verification. Ok thanks, that'll be all.

Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 7 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,164

@793,161 (M)

> I've proven it to myself satisfactorily, and my belief system is quite intact. I see no need to indulge you.

are you justin bieber ?

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,167

@793,163 (A)
As someone who regards believing their own senses as a big mistake, you are in no position to verify much of anything.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,175

@previous (M)
So you believe those people who see aliens, God, the devil and pink elephants are receiving accurate depictions of reality? You're a bit of a flailing spastic aren't you?

Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 8 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,176

shush he himself does not know he is justin bieber

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,183

@793,175 (A)
> So you believe those people who see aliens, God, the devil and pink elephants are receiving accurate depictions of reality?
No. That would be believing everything you see. That's almost as stupid as believing nothing you see.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 51 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,184

@previous (M)
So how do you decide when to believe what you see and when not to?

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,187

@793,176 (P)
Well, he hasn't disproved that he is Justin Bieber

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,193

@793,184 (A)
You should probably apply knowledge and past experience along with some rational thought.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,195

@793,184 (A)

> So how do you decide when to believe what you see and when not to?

Examine how you decide what you believe, explore the range of more reliable and less reliable information sources, explore the tyranny of evidence.

Survey example theories of knowledge, develop your own Theory of Knowledge, test and refine your Theory of Knowledge.

Apply your Theory of Knowledge to improve the accuracy and consistency of your beliefs, and align your beliefs with reality.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,200

@793,193 (M)

> You should probably apply knowledge and past experience along with some rational thought.

How do you know your past experiences are accurately recalled? How can you be sure you're not delusional? Because then your whole method breaks down. You see retard, this is why we submit our 'proof' for verification. If you can't do that, no problem, but I'm surprised I was able to expose the fallacy of your method so effortlessly.

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,205

@previous (A)
We all have surmised that you are delusional. Please see your doctor for a change in your medications.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,208

@previous (R)
Nice wepost. Please see your doctor for a schizophrenia diagnosis.

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,211

@793,205 (R)
We have, yes I agree

Anonymous K replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,213

@previous (L)
I agree as well.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 13 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,214

@793,211 (L)
Seriously, get yourself checked Anon R.

Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,219

@previous (A)
Anon R is correct. You are delusional.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 28 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,220

@previous (H)
Why do you think this?

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,222

@793,213 (K)
Same for me.

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 33 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,223

@793,200 (A)
> How can you be sure you're not delusional?

It's not me I'm worried about.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 44 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,224

@previous (M)
So you can't be sure. Ok thanks, that'll be all.

Anonymous R replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,225

@793,220 (A)

I read your topic and then your replies.
So far many agree with me and no one agrees with you.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,227

@previous (R)
So your answer for why you think that is because you've found people to agree with you? Lol spastic, no wonder you're unable to prove there's an elephant in your oven.

Anonymous R replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,228

@previous (A)
My oven? Elephant? You might consider taking reading 101 again.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,229

@previous (R)

> You might consider taking reading 101 again.

You're talking to yourself again Anon M. It's a sign of delusion. This is why it's important to submit your 'proof' for verification.

Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,232

@previous (A)

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,263

@792,960 (A)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #793,297

@793,232 (M)
Just 3 letters you need huh? Lol no wonder you don't know how to prove there isn't an elephant in your oven.

Minichan