Topic: I accept my place in Hell for transitioning.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 9 years ago #63,274

Although, I may end up in purgatory due to loose definitions of cross-dressing in the ultimate legal book.

I guess I could always end up a Bat Out of Hell.

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #792,087

Leviticus 22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

You're fucked lol ???????????

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 25 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,088

ik ben een kind van de duivel

Anonymous C double-posted this 9 years ago, 24 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,089

mama jij hoeft niet te huilen

Anonymous C triple-posted this 9 years ago, 15 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,090

feesten alsof elke dag mijn laatste is

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,091

@OP
Maybe you could convert to Islam. According to Muhammad men who are feminine by nature should be accepted, as long as they don't pollute their bodies via prostitution.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,093

@792,087 (Meta)
It doesn't say anything about women with a soul of a man or a man with a soul of a woman. See how that could be spun? Of course, if that is the case, then it could also spin to where a man with a soul of a woman or a woman with a soul of a man already committed cross-dressing by dressing like the gender of the body they were born into. So that could also mean I am fucked or I get sent to purgatory. I guess it's time to find a good lawyer in Hell, I heard they were great for legal representation.

@previous (D)
Please provide a source for that?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,096

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 14 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,245

@792,093 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)

http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/images/The_effeminates_of_early_medina.pdf

A mukhannath is the one ("male") who carries in his movements, in his appearance and in his language the characteristics of a woman. There are two types; the first is the one in whom these characteristics are innate, he did not put them on by himself, and therein is no guilt, no blame and no shame, as long as he does not perform any (illicit) act or exploit it for money (prostitution etc.). The second type acts like a woman out of immoral purposes and he is the sinner and blameworthy.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,248

@792,093 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
God doesn't mismatch souls. Thanks.

brie !kiTty82duI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 35 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,255

I'm going to hell too, but the afterparty will be killer.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,281

Youre horny again

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,283

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I thought replacing testosterone with estrogen made people less horny.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,284

@previous (Meta)
Catherine is already zero horny. Less? Is there a value less than zero?

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,286

@792,248 (G)
And you speak for God... why?

@792,281 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
No, this does not make me horny.

@792,245 (F)
I always thought I may look good in a hijab, but if the first one is so commonly accepted in Islam then why do Muslims still execute gays and trannies?

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 34 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,291

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
It's cute you think you can worm around established theology. You don't have a female soul. I hope transitioning makes you happier, but you are way way way too dumb to be pretentious.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,293

@792,255 (brie !kiTty82duI)
for the survivors?

lol

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 57 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,294

@792,286 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> then why do Muslims still execute gays and trannies?
Just taking a stab at this. Remember they can only really use one hand. The left hand is never clean and only has one awful use. So these are really one handed people.
Gays and trannies have a negative stigma about them. Executing may seem harsh but remember these people live as tho they are still in the 5th century.

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,297

@previous (L)
Could the Islamic world ever enter the 21st century or even the 14th or 17th century?

@792,291 (G)
> established theology
> theology
I think you mean organized religious dogma. Because claiming that you know the rules of such divine beings is foolish. Organized religions only think they know what God desires when they could be wrong just as any atheist would be. Shit, the second coming could have already happened and God's new incarnation is Richard Dawkins himself here to test people's faith. To deny this possibility would be blasphemy, because what if it were true then you just slandered your Lord.

Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,299

@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Why would they bother? I can think of 100 reasons why the 5th centruy life style works for them.

Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,300

@792,297 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
What did I tell you about being pretentious?

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,301

@previous (G)
Ahh, but you do not deny that Richard Dawkins could be God as a means of testing his followers' faith. That is good. Because that is something that we cannot prove nor disprove. It's kind of like Solipsism, to be honest.

Anonymous K replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,308

@792,297 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Dawkins is a dick..

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,309

@previous (K)
Then insert another known atheist who isn't a dick.

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 45 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,311

I'm going back to heaven where I belong because I'm an angel

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,337

@792,286 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Yes it does. Dont lie

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,338

@792,283 (Meta)
For Catherine it has ramped up her sex drive

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,340

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
So does that mean she really is female after all?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,486

@previous (Meta)
It does!

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #792,501

@792,093 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Johnny Cochran would probably be an excellent choice..

Minichan