Topic: What is othering?
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #63,269
Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #792,066
SJW Newspeak. I think it means something like making someone feel like they don't belong, that they're a lesser person.
Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,068
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 28 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,071
@previous (Meta)
Seriously. The group's name is FemSoc. You couldn't get closer to 1984 if you tried.
> more like sociology 101
That's what the SJW indoctrination classes are called.
Seriously. The group's name is FemSoc. You couldn't get closer to 1984 if you tried.
> more like sociology 101
That's what the SJW indoctrination classes are called.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,072
It's a term that sounded clever three years ago, but now evokes anger in me through overuse. At this point I'd like to have a cultural appropriation themed party and we can other each other, though with fine cocktails in hand
When I was a lad, sociology courses were about group behaviour in various settings, applicable to city design, business efficiency, and the like, and there was also study of demography and the collection and analysis of societal indicators important for informed governing.
When I was a lad, sociology courses were about group behaviour in various settings, applicable to city design, business efficiency, and the like, and there was also study of demography and the collection and analysis of societal indicators important for informed governing.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #792,074
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,077
as long as I can do some gibberesh that sounds like Irish speech
hey, that OP poster said that they welcome weird offensive questions
that's one of my hobbies
hey, that OP poster said that they welcome weird offensive questions
that's one of my hobbies
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #792,082
It's the stage before crowning.
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,086
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,104
@792,066 (Meta)
Not really. These are well established concepts in psychological research.
Maybe you're suspicious of the group putting these terms forward, and that's understandable, but I assure you that labelling and this concept of "othering" are real.
Not really. These are well established concepts in psychological research.
Maybe you're suspicious of the group putting these terms forward, and that's understandable, but I assure you that labelling and this concept of "othering" are real.
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,105
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
You have to admit that FemSoc sounds like something straight out of 1984.
You have to admit that FemSoc sounds like something straight out of 1984.
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,106
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,111
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,129
Is not retardism a form of thinking outside the box..
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,167
@792,105 (Meta)
> You have to admit that FemSoc sounds like something straight out of 1984.
What are you even talking about
> You have to admit that FemSoc sounds like something straight out of 1984.
What are you even talking about
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,174
@previous (Meta)
The real Meta read the book 1984 by George Orwell and would have gotten that reference.
The real Meta read the book 1984 by George Orwell and would have gotten that reference.
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,176
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 25 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,198
@previous (Meta)
In the book the ruling party was called Ingsoc, which is Newspeak for "English Socialism". FemSoc for "feminist society" sounds like that.
In the book the ruling party was called Ingsoc, which is Newspeak for "English Socialism". FemSoc for "feminist society" sounds like that.
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,200
@previous (Meta)
> In the book the ruling party was called Ingsoc, which is Newspeak for "English Socialism". FemSoc for "feminist society" sounds like that.
where femsox?
> In the book the ruling party was called Ingsoc, which is Newspeak for "English Socialism". FemSoc for "feminist society" sounds like that.
where femsox?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #792,203
