Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Stanford University (PhD) Linguistics Professor cums to the defense of Syntax's Spelling

Syntax started this discussion 9 years ago #63,221

Externally hosted imageJohn Hamilton McWhorter V, is an American academic and linguist who is Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University, where he teaches linguistics, English.

From his TED Talk.

Texting has long been bemoaned as the downfall of the written word, “penmanship for illiterates,” as one critic called it. To which the proper response is LOL. Texting isn’t writing at all — it’s actually more akin to spoken language. And it’s a “spoken” language that is getting richer and more complex by the year.


Texting is developing its own kind of grammar.


Worldwide people speak differently from the way they write, and texting — quick, casual and only intended to be read once — is actually a way of talking with your fingers.

Texting, far from being a scourge, is a work in progress.


http://blog.ted.com/the-linguistic-miracle-of-texting-john-mcwhorter-at-ted2013/

B4 finding the TED talk article I found this
http://mentalfloss.com/article/49960/why-english-spelling-so-messed

Look at some of the ways beauty used to be spelled: bealte, buute, beuaute, bewtee, bewte, beaute, beaultye.

Can anyone here justify beauty? The Cockneys close to Svet wood never need the "U" and wot is rong with Bewtee - for texting Bewte saves tyme fingers n bandwidth/$$


That article starts with

How English spelling ever got so messed up.

bottoms out with how Spelling got fucked cause of French which article says is a good thing cause we get gnocchi pasta from dem neabors

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #791,776

Some people in linguistics are full of shit though

they get some idea and it's their pet and they show everyone their pet but it's a shitbird

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,800

Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,810

@previous (Meta)

> Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,812

some people...like to separate themselves from the herd..

just saying..

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,813

@791,810 (Meta)

> > Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,814

@previous (Meta)

> > > Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,815

itt:

jelly with no peanut butter..

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 50 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,826

@791,814 (F)

> > > > Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,833

@previous (Meta)

> > > > > Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 43 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,845

@previous (Meta)

> > > > > > Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Meta double-posted this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,847

thee the or eye re: John Hamilton McWalter

Syntax (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 14 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,923

@791,776 (Sheila LaBoof)

> Some people in linguistics are full of shit though
>
> they get some idea and it's their pet and they show everyone their pet but it's a shitbird

No shit - Linguistic and Language teachers are mostly mad as fuck over how texting and language translator apps has made their unimportant teaching "specificity" Not so much so important anymore

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,924

@791,845 (Meta)

> > > > > > > Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

Syntax (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,931

@previous (Meta)
Nonsense I type words correctly - You on the other hand read them incorrectly.
Guessing you were educated in one of those low down poor quality states in USA. Most are in the South

Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 51 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #791,942

@previous (Syntax)
Cardiff by the SEA SEA SEA is south of the mason dixie line so it makes sense you type like a literal retard.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #791,944

@previous (D)
> Cardiff by the SEA SEA SEA
Says the one typing with the lobotomy.

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #791,947

@791,923 (Syntax)
ehh, I don't think academics give a shit about translation jobs

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #791,952

@791,800 (Meta)

> Syntax, you do not type in "texting" language: you simply write words incorrectly.

lol yeah this. if you used text speak it might be defensible. you just write like a retard
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.