Topic: Trump is now officially under criminal investigation for obstruction of justice.
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM started this discussion 9 years ago #63,198
Your thoughts?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #791,620
Link?
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #791,621
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #791,622
I smell an impeachment and it smells good.
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 25 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #791,625
My thoughts are cautious optimism.
beckyderp !yDoooooooo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #791,629
?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,640
You libtards crack me the fuck up.
You cry about a possible tampering of votes by Russia during the election, but it was ok for several million illegals to vote for Killary?
You cry about a possible tampering of votes by Russia during the election, but it was ok for several million illegals to vote for Killary?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,641
@previous (F)> You libtards crack me the fuck up.
>
> You cry about a possible tampering of votes by Russia during the election, but it was ok for several million illegals to vote for Killary?
Anonymous G double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,642
how many trump voters forbid their wives to votesqueegee joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,644
tbh this is old news. cool it's been confirmed, but it's been obvious for a while he's been personally under investigation. i guess everyone will act shocked when rico charges are brought against GOP members too for using PACs to launder illegal foreign campaign contributions.
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,648
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 44 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,654
@previous (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
And do you have any evidence that Russia tampered with the voting?
And do you have any evidence that Russia tampered with the voting?
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 56 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,660
@previous (I)
what do you mean by "tampered with the voting?" howabout we don't get all semantical and call it what we currently know it is, russian propaganda microtargeting americans on social media and the hacking of at least 39 different state election boards in an attempt to sway public opinion and directly influence the election. we can speculate a bit based on leaks from the FBI that the hacking attempted to gain access to voter registration rolls, which could have been catastrophic and literal "tampering with the voting" but so far the FBI hasn't disclosed the full extend of the classified information they possess.
so, stop moving the goal posts and look at all the fucking ground that's already been lost, okay? Russia didn't hack the DNC. okay, fine, they hacked the DNC but not the election. Okay, fine, they hacked the election, but they didn't change anyone's vote. okay, fine, the social media propaganda had some effect, but they didn't tamper with the voting...
i mean come the fuck on. and we're the fucking sheep? lol. at this point trump is nothing but an lolcow with nukes.
what do you mean by "tampered with the voting?" howabout we don't get all semantical and call it what we currently know it is, russian propaganda microtargeting americans on social media and the hacking of at least 39 different state election boards in an attempt to sway public opinion and directly influence the election. we can speculate a bit based on leaks from the FBI that the hacking attempted to gain access to voter registration rolls, which could have been catastrophic and literal "tampering with the voting" but so far the FBI hasn't disclosed the full extend of the classified information they possess.
so, stop moving the goal posts and look at all the fucking ground that's already been lost, okay? Russia didn't hack the DNC. okay, fine, they hacked the DNC but not the election. Okay, fine, they hacked the election, but they didn't change anyone's vote. okay, fine, the social media propaganda had some effect, but they didn't tamper with the voting...
i mean come the fuck on. and we're the fucking sheep? lol. at this point trump is nothing but an lolcow with nukes.
Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,661
It's just another "anonymous sources familiar with the matter" article full of hypothetical speculation ?
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,662
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,665
It's so nice to come into a thread and then scroll to the bottom to find that squeegee has just said pretty much what I wanted to say. It really saves time.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,667
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,668
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 46 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,671
16 US intelligence agencies say that Russia tampered with the election. Donald Trump says millions of illegals voted for Hillary. I will choose to believe the CIA et al. over one uneducated hillbilly buffoon.
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,673
@previous (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
Did you believe the 16 US intelligence agencies about Saddam Hussein's WMD too?
Did you believe the 16 US intelligence agencies about Saddam Hussein's WMD too?
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,674
@previous (Meta)
interestingly it was the bush administration that pushed the WMD narrative, not the intelligence community who disagreed that the intelligence was genuine. instead, the pentagon cherry picked what data supported their narrative and then swayed public opinion with what was basically propaganda. you can blame the pentagon and the WH for interpreting intelligence independently from the intelligence community's assessments. nice try though.
interestingly it was the bush administration that pushed the WMD narrative, not the intelligence community who disagreed that the intelligence was genuine. instead, the pentagon cherry picked what data supported their narrative and then swayed public opinion with what was basically propaganda. you can blame the pentagon and the WH for interpreting intelligence independently from the intelligence community's assessments. nice try though.
squeegee double-posted this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,675
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 46 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,680
@previous (squeegee)
Okay let's say the FBI prosecuted Flynn and he was convicted in court of violating the Logan Act. President Trump could immediately pardon him. Presidents can pardon anyone (except themselves) for any reason for any federal crimes, period.
Okay let's say the FBI prosecuted Flynn and he was convicted in court of violating the Logan Act. President Trump could immediately pardon him. Presidents can pardon anyone (except themselves) for any reason for any federal crimes, period.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,681
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,682
@previous (squeegee)
Point being if Trump wanted Flynn not to suffer any consequences for what he did, no one could have stopped him.
Point being if Trump wanted Flynn not to suffer any consequences for what he did, no one could have stopped him.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 26 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,688
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,689
@791,682 (Meta)
The whole situation is weird. Trump didn't fire Comey because of Flynn though. Trump fired him in a really dumb attempt to stop the Russia investigations, of which Flynn is at most one small cog in the machine. Flynn is mega-screwed unless Trump pardons him, and when the FBI lays out the list of crimes Flynn committed, Trump is going to want to distance himself as much as possible from Flynn. Pardoning Flynn makes Trump look complicit in Flynn's... extracurricular activities, and will just bog down his administration even more, if that's even possible.
The whole situation is weird. Trump didn't fire Comey because of Flynn though. Trump fired him in a really dumb attempt to stop the Russia investigations, of which Flynn is at most one small cog in the machine. Flynn is mega-screwed unless Trump pardons him, and when the FBI lays out the list of crimes Flynn committed, Trump is going to want to distance himself as much as possible from Flynn. Pardoning Flynn makes Trump look complicit in Flynn's... extracurricular activities, and will just bog down his administration even more, if that's even possible.
(Edited 50 seconds later.)
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,691
It's real simple: Trump is a narcissistic, arrogant prick who thinks the laws do not apply to him.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,693
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,694
@791,622 (C)
Wow, Meta, that was a real 180° in your opinion. And somehow you took over (OP) status from Matt? Wow!
Wow, Meta, that was a real 180° in your opinion. And somehow you took over (OP) status from Matt? Wow!
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,696
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 47 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,705
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 9 years ago, 42 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,708
@791,696 (Meta)
Just don't buy from the Wine MAfia again. The stuff those guys sell will mess you up.
Just don't buy from the Wine MAfia again. The stuff those guys sell will mess you up.
Anonymous K replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #791,710
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)Making post after post for hours about underage girls "pooting" on your face isn't normal. On wine it is.
Wine. Not even once.