Minichan

Topic: FAO: DasSheeple

Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #62,801

Remind me again, which university did you earn your PhD in Climate Science? Was it Harvard, or Yale?

DasSheeple !l5Ju6Ly8I2 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #788,642

If anything you can trust me because I have zero academic education on climate change.

When it comes to climate change universities don't teach facts, they teach a narrative. They're all about brainwashing people to maintain the profits of certain people... So I'm way smarter about this than most so-called scientists.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #788,643

@previous (DasSheeple !l5Ju6Ly8I2)
Oh, you're one of those people who think that all of academia and science are just a big conspiracy lol. Nevermind: I was going to actually take you seriously.

DasSheeple !l5Ju6Ly8I2 replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #788,644

@previous (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
lol... And here comes Matt to defend the leftie narrative.

If you could just see past the fucking lamestream media lies for one moment, you might notice that climate change and universities are funded by the same particular group of (((people))). So it's up to regular guys like me to find the facts about this stuff.

(Edited 29 seconds later.)

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #788,645

@788,643 (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
LOL which university did you get your Ph.D in climate science from?

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,650

@788,642 (DasSheeple !l5Ju6Ly8I2)

> If anything you can trust me because I have zero academic education on climate change.
>
> When it comes to climate change universities don't teach facts, they teach a narrative. They're all about brainwashing people to maintain the profits of certain people... So I'm way smarter about this than most so-called scientists.

that's what I tell those physicist nerds when I bring out my free energy gizmo

perpetual motion is real people, send me 8 bucks for the plans

Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 9 years ago, 43 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,651

@788,644 (DasSheeple !l5Ju6Ly8I2)

> lol... And here comes Matt to defend the leftie narrative.
>
> If you could just see past the fucking lamestream media lies for one moment, you might notice that climate change and universities are funded by the same particular group of (((people))). So it's up to regular guys like me to find the facts about this stuff.

are you Sarah Palin?!

Sheila LaBoof triple-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,652

@788,645 (Meta)

> LOL which university did you get your Ph.D in climate science from?

where did he claim to know better than the actual people who study this shit

Z !!CQHwQtG/0 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,670

@788,650 (Sheila LaBoof)
I installed a joe cell in my car and now it runs on water. Petrol is for suckers. ?

DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,701

Falling for the clones.

1st of all, I don't have a PhD in Climate Science.
2nd of all, I don't deny climate change, I just doubt it's man made
3rd even considering the 2nd I think we should go way greener, but not for the sake of global warming, but general preservation of nature (water pollution, shrinking of forest areas etc. are something tangible we could and should start fighting)

Now to address why I doubt in man made climate change a.k.a. global warming.

Media has been pushing the 95% consensus shit that has been fought by a ton of climate scientists whose papers have been included in those 95%.
We had this discussion already, I cba. to dig for numbers and the list of papers that has been included in the 95% "the climate change is man made" even tho they were either just "climate change is happening, we don't know the causes" or "climate change is happening, it's a periodic thing, not man made". If I remember well, the "yes it's man made" number of papers would be closer to 60%.

So no, I don't have a PhD in climate science, but I did educate myself a lot in that regard for the same reason I always end up researching shit. To satisfy my curiosity.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,703

@previous (DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew)

Thoughts on Paris accord

DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,704

@previous (H)
Trump is a faggot for leaving it, specially with his push for coal. Coal is cancer.

brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,705

@previous (DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew)
He has to keep at least one campaign promise, why not saving the coal industry?

DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,706

@previous (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
There are far better ones to keep is he wants to MAGA.

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,708

@788,701 (DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew)
"Researching"

Sorry, but Wikipedia and Google are not academic research.

beckyderp !yDoooooooo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,711

@788,706 (DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew)

> There are far better ones to keep is he wants to MAGA.

What

beckyderp !yDoooooooo double-posted this 9 years ago, 23 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,712

@788,708 (C)
Syntax would beg to differ with you

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 56 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,713

@previous (beckyderp !yDoooooooo)
He is, after all, an expert on everything.

Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,715

@788,712 (beckyderp !yDoooooooo)

> Syntax would beg to differ with you

Wondering just how many times you click on the numbers in Wiki? [1] [3] [etc]

4Example
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax
"century of syntactic theory" [6]
200 Years of Syntax: A Critical Survey (googlebook preview).

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,719

@previous (Syntax)
It says you are 200 years old.

Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,727

@788,704 (DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew)

No not trump, the accord itself.

Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,731

@788,719 (C)

> It says you are 200 years old.

Wayyyyy over 200 - Family name Yes as origin is Greek Syntaxis.

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 31 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,741

@previous (Syntax)
No, I mean you yourself.

Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,744

@previous (C)
LOL U are hung up with some random number.
U damn well No there are 15 year olds who hate life so much they no want2b 16

So exactly wot is the good of being some random younger age unless one enjoys all that comes with it.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,817

you will immediately loose any of your internal protection
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.