Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: sean hannity has been tweeting nonstop about Rachel maddow

Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #62,738

what a world

Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #788,114

"Fox News and MSNBC both find themselves in unusual positions right now: Fox is losing and MSNBC is winning."

Fox is running at #3 and only two months ago was the top rated cable channel for news. This drives Hannity even more insane.

Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #788,115

@previous (Syntax)
No one watches TV news anymore. Have you ever seen the ads? It's all for old people shit. The average cable news viewer is like 65 years old.

CNN Fox News and MSNBC are fighting for the best deck chair on the Titanic ?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #788,116

@previous (Meta)
?

Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #788,118

@788,115 (Meta)
The median age of a primetime Fox News viewer is 68, according to Nielsen. That means half of the channel’s viewers are older than 68. CNN’s median primetime viewer, meanwhile, is 59. Fox News still has more total viewers in the 25-to-54 demographic that advertisers covet, but CNN and others are gaining.

Written July 2016

Ads? Only when I am on the Treadmill at 24 hour fitness do I have to switch channels to get around the Ads but I do notice the huge difference of wot Fox has for Ads vs CNN

Also I notice a huge number of much younger people watching those channels. One has to use machines to be in front of TV screen of choice but one can listen to audio via selector switch on each machine. I find it odd that the Food channel gets so many watching that channel - I cannot imagine working off calories while watching food but takes a village.

As to best deck chair? Based on the $Billions each channel pulls in - But yea the other views in Gym are those looking at video on cell phones

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #788,144

someone should make an actual news channel, no talk radio personality shit

viewers of an obviouisly party-run channel are rubes and stooges

it should be a big red flag whenever a politician becomes a host on these fuckin things

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 54 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,151

Liar. No he hasn't. I just checked.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 57 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,162

Megyn Kelly still makes me jizz with minimal effort..

Anonymous G double-posted this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,163

Anonymous G triple-posted this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,164

Butt... there's also Robin Meade..

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,232

@788,151 (F)

> Liar. No he hasn't. I just checked.

what?? i didn't even finish scrolling there were so many

@788,162 (G)
what the fuck

@788,115 (Meta)
there are a lot of old people

Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,233

@previous (A)

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 44 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,239

from 7 years ago, we see the genereX pinching about 30-44, there would be even less so now because of all the heroin suicides

Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 52 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,245

@788,233 (Syntax)
I just have to make it to age 50 and then the females will HAVE to take me.

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,246

@788,232 (A)You read a bunch of ReTweets™

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 21 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,255

@previous (F)
tweet retweet who cares

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 53 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #788,266

@previous (H)
I care. The Twitterverse cares. There is a difference, ya know?

Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #788,474

@previous (F)
no i don't know
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.