Topic: Do you think the United States would ever have a second civil war?
キャサリン? !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 9 years ago #62,452
I know people like to say we're heading for one now, but realistically speaking, could there be a second civil war someday?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #785,887
Could it happen? Yeah.
Will it happen? Unlikely, but it's fun to think about.
Will it happen? Unlikely, but it's fun to think about.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,896
Cath, do you even have the balls(pun intended) to shoot anyone, if your life depended on it?
Meta !faggot joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,924
If we do I'm sure Andrew Jackson would have seen it coming and would have been angry about it.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,926
@previous (Meta !faggot)
What is odd about Trumps education re Jackson was his total lack of knowledge about how Jackson made his money and the huge number of slaves Jackson owned.
What is odd about Trumps education re Jackson was his total lack of knowledge about how Jackson made his money and the huge number of slaves Jackson owned.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 37 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,927
slow it down CatherineMeta !faggot replied with this 9 years ago, 51 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,938
@785,926 (Syntax)
That's just how cotton growing worked in 1830s Tennessee. I think most Presidents up to that point had owned slaves.
Why does Andrew Jackson get so much criticism for slavery when 12 out of the first 18 Presidents owned slaves, and Washington and Jefferson owned more slaves than Jackson?
That's just how cotton growing worked in 1830s Tennessee. I think most Presidents up to that point had owned slaves.
Why does Andrew Jackson get so much criticism for slavery when 12 out of the first 18 Presidents owned slaves, and Washington and Jefferson owned more slaves than Jackson?
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,939
Meta !faggot replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,940
Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,941
@785,938 (Meta !faggot)
My point n b4 Trump I had no clue until look up - Jackson started out with a small amount of land n slaves n managed to built a land empire with a mass of slaves to work his land.
My point n b4 Trump I had no clue until look up - Jackson started out with a small amount of land n slaves n managed to built a land empire with a mass of slaves to work his land.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,943
@785,938 (Meta !faggot)
Trump explicitly mentioned Jackson which is why people are talking about him and not Washington or Jefferson. I don't see why that's confusing.
Trump explicitly mentioned Jackson which is why people are talking about him and not Washington or Jefferson. I don't see why that's confusing.
Meta !faggot replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,944
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It's not confusing but people act like Andrew Jackson was uniquely evil for having a slave plantation when that was pretty common for the Southern upper class at the time.
It's not confusing but people act like Andrew Jackson was uniquely evil for having a slave plantation when that was pretty common for the Southern upper class at the time.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,949
@previous (Meta !faggot)
He was extremely controversial even in his own time for reasons that had nothing to do with slavery. I've never met anyone intelligent who thinks the uniquely bad thing Jackson did was own slaves like every other rich white southerner, but if you want to criticize some unstated person for believing a dumb thing I won't disagree with you.
He was extremely controversial even in his own time for reasons that had nothing to do with slavery. I've never met anyone intelligent who thinks the uniquely bad thing Jackson did was own slaves like every other rich white southerner, but if you want to criticize some unstated person for believing a dumb thing I won't disagree with you.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Meta !faggot replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,950
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 47 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,952
What's so civil about war anyway? What we got here is failure to communicate.