Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later[^][v]#784,561
It's like newspapers. If you picked up a newspaper when they had newspapers, you would have found sections with titles such as Entertainment, Lifestyle, and like that. There would be regular writers called columnists who would have to think up stuff to write several times in one month.
I had a newspaper that devoted a whole front page of a section to astrological predications for every sign of the zodiac! Jussus Christ!
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#784,564
The Daily Mail? Being shite? That doesn't add up at all...
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#784,797
Daily Mail has always been at least partially a rag, right? A site that puts in good articles here and there, but is sure to pepper itself with bullshit? That's what I thought, anyway. I put them in the same category as the Huffington post.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#784,798
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
So the hard hitting journalism category? The daily mail and infowars do have some things in common.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#784,834
> This is an opinion piece
Anonymous F double-posted this 9 years ago, 41 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#784,835