Topic: Will North Korea trigger nuclear war?
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #61,876
They seem like they want to be big shots making the rest of the world afraid that they have missiles capable of reaching the United States. The same tactic that Russia used to employ a lot. They are a small state that thinks themselves big. China won't come to their rescue if they start some shit due to economic ties with the U.S. But who's the say someone won't interrupt such a nuclear strike as a means of assault against another powerful nation? What if DPRK makes it look like the U.S. attack Russia in some sort of false flag approach? Are we all doomed?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #780,444
nope
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #780,448
No
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #780,449
One of these from USA eliminates North Korea and nothing of value will be lostAnonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #780,450
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 55 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #780,451
And parts of Japan
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #780,456
This isn't news and it's never going to go come to war. Thanks.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,476
@780,444 (B)
@780,448 (C)
@previous (E)
You all seem very confident about that. You don't think this tense situation could escalate?
@780,448 (C)
@previous (E)
You all seem very confident about that. You don't think this tense situation could escalate?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,478
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,479
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 50 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,481
Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,482
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,483
@previous (H)
You must have high standards for news if the prospect of war bores you.
It's funny how everyone on Minichan has suddenly morphed into an expert on North Korea, and is adamant that there is no risk of conflict.
You must have high standards for news if the prospect of war bores you.
It's funny how everyone on Minichan has suddenly morphed into an expert on North Korea, and is adamant that there is no risk of conflict.
Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,485
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,486
@780,476 (F)
> You all seem very confident about that. You don't think this tense situation could escalate?
No
> You all seem very confident about that. You don't think this tense situation could escalate?
No
Anonymous C double-posted this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,487
@780,483 (F)
> You must have high standards for news if the prospect of war bores you.
>
> It's funny how everyone on Minichan has suddenly morphed into an expert on North Korea, and is adamant that there is no risk of conflict.
It's not about being "experts", it's about having the slightest ideas of what this 'conflict' is about, why now it has suddenly become daily news (hint: it's not because of a 'nuclear programme'), and how easily terrified and manipulated the average person (i.e you) is by a panic-mongering media.
> You must have high standards for news if the prospect of war bores you.
>
> It's funny how everyone on Minichan has suddenly morphed into an expert on North Korea, and is adamant that there is no risk of conflict.
It's not about being "experts", it's about having the slightest ideas of what this 'conflict' is about, why now it has suddenly become daily news (hint: it's not because of a 'nuclear programme'), and how easily terrified and manipulated the average person (i.e you) is by a panic-mongering media.
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,488
@previous (C)
lmao. So you're one of those people who's smarter than the mainstream media and all of the politicians and experts who think there's a risk?
Please, explain yourself. Tell me why there is nothing to be worried about, and link to supporting evidence. Thanks.
lmao. So you're one of those people who's smarter than the mainstream media and all of the politicians and experts who think there's a risk?
Please, explain yourself. Tell me why there is nothing to be worried about, and link to supporting evidence. Thanks.
Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,489
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,490
@780,488 (F)
> lmao. So you're one of those people who's smarter than the mainstream media and all of the politicians and experts who think there's a risk?
Let me know when "all of the politicians and experts" find Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, ok snowflake? Let me know when the ebola virus has wiped out the East Coast of America. Let me know when Donald Trump has ended Roe v Wade, enslaved all women, tanked the economy, and started a nuclear war with China and Russia. Ok kid?
Now stay glued to your CNN site being drip-fed fear on an hourly basis, helping them increase their ad revenue, like a good little retarded sheep. "All those experts and politicians" have some important messages to tell you.
> lmao. So you're one of those people who's smarter than the mainstream media and all of the politicians and experts who think there's a risk?
Let me know when "all of the politicians and experts" find Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, ok snowflake? Let me know when the ebola virus has wiped out the East Coast of America. Let me know when Donald Trump has ended Roe v Wade, enslaved all women, tanked the economy, and started a nuclear war with China and Russia. Ok kid?
Now stay glued to your CNN site being drip-fed fear on an hourly basis, helping them increase their ad revenue, like a good little retarded sheep. "All those experts and politicians" have some important messages to tell you.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,492
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 17 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,495
@780,490 (C)
And I didn't think so. When pressed, this self-proclaimed expert on North Korea can't justify what he's said.
Looks like logic and reason won this one.
And I didn't think so. When pressed, this self-proclaimed expert on North Korea can't justify what he's said.
Looks like logic and reason won this one.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,502
How would they make the USA look responsible for your nuclear terrorism scenario?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #780,533
catdraad