Topic: Why does TG always bring shit up from 5 years ago?
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #61,613 Is it because a disgruntled father knocked his sorry ass into the next decade?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 1 hour later[^] [v] #777,851 @OP
> Is it because a disgruntled father knocked his sorry ass into the next decade?
This makes no sense.
The next decade is 3 years away. If, from that vantage point, TG is "bringing up things from 5 years ago", that means he's talking about things that happened in 2015 at the latest. What, then, is the relevance of his having been kicked into the next decade? Or did you mean "5 years ago" from now, i.e our vantage point, not his? Because that would make the frame of reference 2012, which still renders completely pointless the notion that he was "kicked into the next decade".
Explain what you meant, if you can.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #777,859 @previous (B)
Nice madpost
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago , 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,874 @777,851 (B)
Keep your helmet on.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,878 Matt and syntax bring up shit from 25 years ago, what's the difference?
P.S. Hi Matt!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago , 32 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,879 @previous (D)
> everyone is MattAnonymous C replied with this 9 years ago , 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,881 @777,878 (D)
Syntax is senile and to him that was yesterday
Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,891 Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago , 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,900 @777,874 (A)
So you can't explain it. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago , 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,902 @previous (B)
Nice madpost
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,914 @777,881 (C)
> Syntax is senile and to him that was yesterday
Does Matt have the same excuse?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago , 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,964 @previous (F)
No one cares, faggot. You obsess about Matt daily. Get a life.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,965 @previous (A)
> No one cares, faggot. You obsess about Matt daily. Get a life.
MATT HO-BE-IST
Anonymous G double-posted this 9 years ago , 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,966 FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,986 @777,851 (B)
What is a day?
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago , 20 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,992 @previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
One of the divisional units by which time is measured. Why do you ask?
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago , 27 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #777,997 Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago , 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,000 @777,986 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
A miserable little pile of minutes.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 9 years ago , 2 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,015 @777,992 (B)
Just in case I ever need to explain it to someone.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago , 5 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,036 @previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
You didn't already know what a day is? Lol retard :)
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago , 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,039 @previous (B)
Nice madpost
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 9 years ago , 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,248 @778,036 (B)
I would've just said it's the divisions on a calendar.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago , 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,250 @previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
But now you won't?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 9 years ago , 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,360 @previous (B)
No, now I will use your more precise definition to avoid any possible confusion.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago , 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,362 @previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
How often does it happen to you that somebody asks you what a day is?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 9 years ago , 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,367 @previous (B)
I can't say it's happened to me, but I've seen it happen twice on here, so it seemed like it'd be a good idea to be prepared.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago , 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,370 @previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> I can't say it's happened to me, but I've seen it happen twice on here
If you've seen it happen twice on here, then why did you need to ask for the definition? It was given already on those 2 occasions, no?
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 9 years ago , 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,377 @previous (B)
Lots were given, but they all seemed to be unsatisfactory to whoever wanted to know.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago , 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #778,380 @previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> Lots were given, but they all seemed to be unsatisfactory to whoever wanted to know.
Including you?
↕