Topic: Is it true that Syntax was a founding member of MS-13?
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #61,277
He is a true badass!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #774,992
Why did you form your conclusion before receiving an answer to the question in your headline?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #774,993
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #774,996
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #774,998
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #774,999
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #775,001
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #775,006
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #775,024
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #775,025
No he didn't and MS-13 isn't "badass"
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #775,028
@775,024 (C)
My answer to your question is that it seems like a pointless and lonely way to spend your life. What's your answer to mine?
My answer to your question is that it seems like a pointless and lonely way to spend your life. What's your answer to mine?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 23 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #775,263
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #775,511
@775,028 (B)
That life has no objective and inherent meaning and thus all "uses" of a life are as valid and meaningful as the others.
That life has no objective and inherent meaning and thus all "uses" of a life are as valid and meaningful as the others.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #775,522
@775,025 (D)
I beg to differ...I have met a couple of their ladies whom are tougher than almost all the men I know...If you ever encounter those guys on the street I would recommend being respectful..
I beg to differ...I have met a couple of their ladies whom are tougher than almost all the men I know...If you ever encounter those guys on the street I would recommend being respectful..
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #775,535
@775,511 (C)
> That life has no objective and inherent meaning and thus all "uses" of a life are as valid and meaningful as the others.
Your "thus" is misplaced here, because one doesn't follow from the other. What, for example, about the existentialist idea that we must create our own meaning in a meaningless world, and that those meanings are capable of having degrees of value?
> That life has no objective and inherent meaning and thus all "uses" of a life are as valid and meaningful as the others.
Your "thus" is misplaced here, because one doesn't follow from the other. What, for example, about the existentialist idea that we must create our own meaning in a meaningless world, and that those meanings are capable of having degrees of value?
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #775,536
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,550
@775,535 (B)
I agree with them that meanings are created, but not that we must. Most people do it unconsciously and have deluded themselves into thinking their interior meaning is the true one.
I agree with them that meanings are created, but not that we must. Most people do it unconsciously and have deluded themselves into thinking their interior meaning is the true one.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,553
@previous (C)
> I agree with them that meanings are created, but not that we must. Most people do it unconsciously and have deluded themselves into thinking their interior meaning is the true one.
How does this tie in with your earlier statement that "all uses of a life as are valid and meaningful as others?" If this is true then who are you to say who is or isn't "deluding" themselves into thinking their meaning is 'the true one'. Existentialism, which you just said you agree with, directly states that the individual's meaning is, almost by definition, 'the true one'. I think you've tied yourself into a bit of knot here. I'll let you dwell on it. Ciao for now!
> I agree with them that meanings are created, but not that we must. Most people do it unconsciously and have deluded themselves into thinking their interior meaning is the true one.
How does this tie in with your earlier statement that "all uses of a life as are valid and meaningful as others?" If this is true then who are you to say who is or isn't "deluding" themselves into thinking their meaning is 'the true one'. Existentialism, which you just said you agree with, directly states that the individual's meaning is, almost by definition, 'the true one'. I think you've tied yourself into a bit of knot here. I'll let you dwell on it. Ciao for now!
Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,571
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,580
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,601
@775,553 (B)
Well I have no more information than you share in your replies, I'm certainly not studying existentialism just to make a Minichan post. Sorry if I got the wrong idea I guess but that's just your lousy explanation
Anyway it ties in because it means all uses of life are meaningless Objectively, which means that the subjective meanings should all be considered as true as each other, which is to say not at all.
Well I have no more information than you share in your replies, I'm certainly not studying existentialism just to make a Minichan post. Sorry if I got the wrong idea I guess but that's just your lousy explanation
Anyway it ties in because it means all uses of life are meaningless Objectively, which means that the subjective meanings should all be considered as true as each other, which is to say not at all.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,604
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,609
@775,601 (C)
> it ties in because it means all uses of life are meaningless Objectively, which means that the subjective meanings should all be considered as true as each other, which is to say not at all.
You're still not getting it aren't you? According to your own theory there can be no concepts of 'objective' and 'subjective', since your position is one of moral nihilism, and so why do you keep making this leap to "all uses of life are meaningless"? Who says this? By the premise of your own position, this claim makes no sense.
> it ties in because it means all uses of life are meaningless Objectively, which means that the subjective meanings should all be considered as true as each other, which is to say not at all.
You're still not getting it aren't you? According to your own theory there can be no concepts of 'objective' and 'subjective', since your position is one of moral nihilism, and so why do you keep making this leap to "all uses of life are meaningless"? Who says this? By the premise of your own position, this claim makes no sense.
Anonymous B double-posted this 9 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,610
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 39 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,613
jr Ward spokesperson joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 48 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,620
Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #775,635
WTF?