It's the best we can expect. We should be greteful.
3
21%
That's bad, we need to work on it.
8
57%
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#106,530
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^][v]#106,532
This chart really covers how a generic product is being split up when dealing with demand and supply, especially in the "microeconomics" study. WE need to focus on synergizing the forces in the economy so more people can be in the top 5%.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#106,539
I think no matter how good or bad the economy is, the top 5% will always be 1 in 20 and you're just using a mathematical neat-nonsense to see how many people fall for this little trick.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#106,564
remember how Only 1 in 20 is considered in the "top 5%" implys a fraciton within the 5%
Flapjack !!vHCjY3yik joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#106,741
Oh no! Why isn't everyone rich :'{
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#106,756
> 20 * 5 = 100
> mfw 5% is 1 in 20
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#106,782