Topic: Scottish seeking independence.

Green !BEERiVqJJw started this discussion 9 years ago #60,765

Lol.

Poll option	Votes	Percentage
Scottish independence now!	2	20%
As an American, I thought Britain consisted solely of England.	6	60%
Keep the union!	2	20%

brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #770,070

Aren't they always?

Green !BEERiVqJJw (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #770,071

@previous (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
Only for the past few millenia.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 57 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #770,072

@OP
Wipe your shitty arse, you British bell-end.

Green !BEERiVqJJw (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #770,074

@previous (C)
*English bell-end (if the Scottish get their independence). Also, nice madpost.

Green !BEERiVqJJw (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #770,079

The U̶n̶i̶t̶e̶d̶ Kingdom.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #770,082

As a "Scot", I absolutely dread the prospect myself.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #770,084

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

You're not a scot. First you would have to be human!

brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #770,085

@previous (E)
No True Scotsman

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #770,090

@770,084 (E)
I had inverted my commas for a reason. The same reason I coined the term "Celtonegroid".

Scots are subhumans whom I'm ashamed to be associated witj.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #770,093

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
They're ashamed of being associated witj you too.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #770,094

@previous (F) most Scots don't even know me

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #770,095

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Thank god for that. Poor bastards.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,108

What part of europe is scotland?

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,109

@770,090 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

> I had inverted my commas for a reason.

Those aren't inverted commas you babbling spastic, those are speech marks.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,112

@previous (C)
The two are synonymous, retard. Quotation marks in form are essentially commas having undergone inversion, hence the name. Don't they teach this in your special ed classes? (Of course they didn't, why am I even asking? Lol.)

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,115

there's a new Trainspotting movie coming out

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,127

@770,108 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It's not. Scotland is a phenotypically, racially, and ethnically Afroid African nation.

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,129

@770,112 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

> The two are synonymous, retard.

No they aren't. Re-writing the meaning of words doesn't make your spastic outbursts any more coherent, retard.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,130

@previous (C)
They are synonymous, being upset about it doesn't change it

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 32 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,131

@770,129 (C)
It literally says so in every major grammatical reference source Omfg how obtuse are you?

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,133

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

> It literally says so in every major grammatical reference source

No it doesn't. Making baseless claims doesn't make your spastic outbursts any more credible, retard.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,135

@previous (C)
Well that's easy to say when you don't even read them

Making counter assertions is not how you form a soundly valid refutation you Down's syndromic retrograde.

Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 38 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,136

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

> Well that's easy to say when you understand the meaning of the word 'literally'

Lol spastic

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,137

@previous (C)
Oh you're one of those idiots who overuses its "ironic" definition and thinks they're clever.
Fuck your literary idioms you overeducated, under intelligent mong.

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,139

@770,112 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

Speech marks are ", inverted commas are '.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 55 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,141

@previous (E)
Inverted commas refer to both forms from what I could adduce. Quotation marks also refer to either. Nothing distinguisjes them.

Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,142

@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

If " is an inverted comma, then logically following a comma should appear thus: ,,

Since this is not the case, it stands to reason that inverted comma should appear with only one mark.

You're right about quotation marks being used as an umbrella term though.

Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,144

@previous (E)
Quotation marks didn't land on the moon

hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,174

@770,112 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)

> The two are synonymous, retard. Quotation marks in form are essentially commas having undergone inversion, hence the name. Don't they teach this in your special ed classes?
sounds like something they'd only teach in special ed classes

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 7 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,328

in some places, they use <<these marks>>

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,347

@770,144 (I)
You can't prove that

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,437

@770,084 (E)
The Scots do not qualify as human.

brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,438

@770,347 (K)
proof is negroidal. thanks.

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #770,445

@770,328 (Sheila LaBoof)

> in some places, they use <<these marks>>

Yes. Korean is one such language. I think Chinese does that as well to a lesser extent.

dw !vJwW0tsPXQ joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,500

@770,108 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It's the province of Denmark next to the Netherlands

Minichan