Topic: is there a way to get rid of people who still think moon landings were hoax
Sheila LaBoof started this discussion 9 years ago #60,716
Some kind of sniper team or something
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 49 seconds later[^] [v] #769,585
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 seconds later, 52 seconds after the original post[^] [v] #769,586
Just send them to the moon.Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,588
@OP
During Obama's reign, he was just spraying chemtrails over their homes to give them Morgellon's disease.
Trump stopped that though http://chronicle.su/2017/01/16/trump-promises-end-of-chemtrails/
During Obama's reign, he was just spraying chemtrails over their homes to give them Morgellon's disease.
Trump stopped that though http://chronicle.su/2017/01/16/trump-promises-end-of-chemtrails/
Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 32 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,589
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,590
hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,595
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,601
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 23 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,602
@OP
If we vaccinate them all, then maybe they'll start believing they are autistic. Then they can shut up and go spin plates in the corner or something.
If we vaccinate them all, then maybe they'll start believing they are autistic. Then they can shut up and go spin plates in the corner or something.
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,610
You know what Americans were good at in the late 60s? Making movies. Hollywood was pretty much the best in the world at making up fake shit. You know what Americans weren't good at? Going to space. The Americans just filmed a fake landing to pretend they beat the Russians.
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,611
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
> Hollywood was pretty much the best in the world at making up fake shit.
No, that would be The New York Times.
> Hollywood was pretty much the best in the world at making up fake shit.
No, that would be The New York Times.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 1 second later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #769,612
Stanley Kubrick was ready to admit he filmed the fake moon landing in 1969 and that's why he suddenly and mysteriously died. He was killed by the CIA/Illuminati.
Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,632
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,634
Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,636
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,639
Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,640
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,641
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Those are some pretty shit snipers you have there if they can only hit a perfectly still target. LOL is there no end to your fucking retarded idiocy?
Those are some pretty shit snipers you have there if they can only hit a perfectly still target. LOL is there no end to your fucking retarded idiocy?
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,643
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,646
I think that we landed there but the footage is fake
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,683
@769,585 (B)
Certainly. The lunar expedition left various artifacts on the moon, including reflective plates which were late used to conduct lazer-based experiments from Earthside. The Lunar Ranging program is still in operation to the present day. I'm surprised you were unaware of this. It's more or less common knowledge.
Certainly. The lunar expedition left various artifacts on the moon, including reflective plates which were late used to conduct lazer-based experiments from Earthside. The Lunar Ranging program is still in operation to the present day. I'm surprised you were unaware of this. It's more or less common knowledge.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,686
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,687
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 7 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,688
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,691
@769,687 (I)
> What proof would you accept?
Proof is proof you retard, there's no concept of 'accepting' it. You don't get to pick and choose which proof you 'accept'. Fucking hell you are a such a retard, how can you not know this? No wonder you keep posting all this spastic shit, you think people can just choose which 'proof' they accept?? LOL idiot
> What proof would you accept?
Proof is proof you retard, there's no concept of 'accepting' it. You don't get to pick and choose which proof you 'accept'. Fucking hell you are a such a retard, how can you not know this? No wonder you keep posting all this spastic shit, you think people can just choose which 'proof' they accept?? LOL idiot
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,696
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,700
@previous (I)
> No need to be abusive.
Awwwww what's up precious, do I hurt your feelings when I tear your theories to pieces?
You're an idiot and the sooner you face it the sooner you'll stop embarrassing yourself and wasting everyone's time. You think that people can choose what truth or reality to believe in. This, to me, is a fucking retard and I don't give a fuck if that offends you. Credulous morons like you are what hold back science.
> No need to be abusive.
Awwwww what's up precious, do I hurt your feelings when I tear your theories to pieces?
You're an idiot and the sooner you face it the sooner you'll stop embarrassing yourself and wasting everyone's time. You think that people can choose what truth or reality to believe in. This, to me, is a fucking retard and I don't give a fuck if that offends you. Credulous morons like you are what hold back science.
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 40 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,701
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,703
@previous (I)
"Flat"? The quality of "having no raised areas or indentations"? No, I don't believe this. Why do you ask?
"Flat"? The quality of "having no raised areas or indentations"? No, I don't believe this. Why do you ask?
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,705
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,710
@previous (I)
> No, flat as in "not an oblate spheroid".
Holy fucking shit, you just keep getting more and more retarded by the post. That is not what "flat" means you cretin. A fucking pyramid is also "not an oblate spheroid", that doesn't mean a pyramid is the definition of "flat". Christ, you don't even know what the words you're using mean. I'm about done with you, there's no hope for you, you fucking spastic.
> No, flat as in "not an oblate spheroid".
Holy fucking shit, you just keep getting more and more retarded by the post. That is not what "flat" means you cretin. A fucking pyramid is also "not an oblate spheroid", that doesn't mean a pyramid is the definition of "flat". Christ, you don't even know what the words you're using mean. I'm about done with you, there's no hope for you, you fucking spastic.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,711
@769,700 (B)
You're calling everyone a retard and flailing about like a spastic but answer this, if you are so clever then why are you spending time arguing with people you regard as retards?
You're calling everyone a retard and flailing about like a spastic but answer this, if you are so clever then why are you spending time arguing with people you regard as retards?
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,716
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
In your specific case? It amuses me to watch you spazz out on here every time it's pointed out to you why you're a fucking retard.
In your specific case? It amuses me to watch you spazz out on here every time it's pointed out to you why you're a fucking retard.
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 27 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,718
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,719
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,720
ITT: Dave has another autistic meltdown.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,721
@769,719 (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
> OK. Go re-read your posts then ask yourself who is spazzing out.
OK. Did it. "Green" is my answer.
> OK. Go re-read your posts then ask yourself who is spazzing out.
OK. Did it. "Green" is my answer.
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,722
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 28 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,723
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,725
@769,722 (I)
This is not an 'ask me anything' thread retard, go obsess over someone else you fucking loser.
This is not an 'ask me anything' thread retard, go obsess over someone else you fucking loser.
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,726
@previous (B)
Prove this is not an 'ask me anything' thread.
Also, prove I cannot ask you anything.
Prove this is not an 'ask me anything' thread.
Also, prove I cannot ask you anything.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 4 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,727
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,728
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,747
@769,688 (hot toddy)
I think that America and Russia found something and thats what really ended the cold war
I think that America and Russia found something and thats what really ended the cold war
Dw !vJwW0tsPXQ joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,827
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,838
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,869
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,874
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,881
? joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,882
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #769,984
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,019
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Like proof of extraterrestrials that would have made the fabric of American life* unravel?
*The narrative of Christianity
Like proof of extraterrestrials that would have made the fabric of American life* unravel?
*The narrative of Christianity
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,022
Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,025
@769,586 (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
> Just send them to the moon.
that guy is really hungry for that marshmallow on fire
> Just send them to the moon.
that guy is really hungry for that marshmallow on fire
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,050
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,105
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,184
@770,019 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
@770,022 (hot toddy)
@770,050 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
That is what I believe. That they found aliens and were afraid of how it would effect society.
@770,022 (hot toddy)
@770,050 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
That is what I believe. That they found aliens and were afraid of how it would effect society.
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,186
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,192
@770,184 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Like intelligent life? Wouldn't they have some form of civilization or at least traces visible from earth or satellites or something, from one of the many space agencies across the world? Is life even sustainable on the moon?
Like intelligent life? Wouldn't they have some form of civilization or at least traces visible from earth or satellites or something, from one of the many space agencies across the world? Is life even sustainable on the moon?
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,197
@769,881 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> Why would they fake it
Propaganda. There was a space race going on with the Soviets.
> Why would they fake it
Propaganda. There was a space race going on with the Soviets.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #770,202
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,205
@770,197 (B)
Yeah I understand the faking it argument but please read the second part of that sentence also
Yeah I understand the faking it argument but please read the second part of that sentence also
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,211
@previous (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> Yeah I understand the faking it argument but please read the second part of that sentence also
The "second part of that sentence" was your reply to Kook's post, not mine. I don't share Kook's theory that we faked it "but went there anyway", I only share her idea that the landings were possibly faked.
Not everything is about you, there are other people in this thread, so please try and pay attention.
> Yeah I understand the faking it argument but please read the second part of that sentence also
The "second part of that sentence" was your reply to Kook's post, not mine. I don't share Kook's theory that we faked it "but went there anyway", I only share her idea that the landings were possibly faked.
Not everything is about you, there are other people in this thread, so please try and pay attention.
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,212
@previous (B)
The whole sentence was actually a reply to her post, I didn't reply to you at all before you did.
The whole sentence was actually a reply to her post, I didn't reply to you at all before you did.
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ double-posted this 9 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,213
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,215
@770,212 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> The whole sentence was actually a reply to her post
And I am offering my own answer to the first part of it. Again, it's not all about you. These little fits of self-obsessed pique of yours are doing nothing to quash your reputation as the forum idiot I must say.
> The whole sentence was actually a reply to her post
And I am offering my own answer to the first part of it. Again, it's not all about you. These little fits of self-obsessed pique of yours are doing nothing to quash your reputation as the forum idiot I must say.
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,216
@770,211 (B)
> I only share her idea that the landings were possibly faked.
Kook said she thinks we landed, but the footage was faked. Please try and pay attention.
> I only share her idea that the landings were possibly faked.
Kook said she thinks we landed, but the footage was faked. Please try and pay attention.
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,218
@770,215 (B)
You can't answer to half of a question because you'll completely miss my point. As I said i understand your argument. I wasn't asking why the moon landing would be faked, I was asking why it would be faked if they went to the moon.
Once more I understand why people believe the moon landing was faked.
You can't answer to half of a question because you'll completely miss my point. As I said i understand your argument. I wasn't asking why the moon landing would be faked, I was asking why it would be faked if they went to the moon.
Once more I understand why people believe the moon landing was faked.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,219
@previous (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> I was asking why it would be faked if they went to the moon.
And you asking me this now? You're assuming they went to the moon. That is not my position. I'm suggesting they may not have. Why are you struggling so much with this?
> I was asking why it would be faked if they went to the moon.
And you asking me this now? You're assuming they went to the moon. That is not my position. I'm suggesting they may not have. Why are you struggling so much with this?
Anonymous B double-posted this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,220
@770,216 (F)
> possibly faked.
>
> Kook said she thinks we landed
Yes indeed, please try and pay attention, retard.
> possibly faked.
>
> Kook said she thinks we landed
Yes indeed, please try and pay attention, retard.
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,221
@770,219 (B)
No I asked that in my initial question to Kook. I wasn't asking for your view on it because I am not interested in your view.
I've said what I wanted to say to you thrice now so if you still don't understand you are out of luck, sorry.
No I asked that in my initial question to Kook. I wasn't asking for your view on it because I am not interested in your view.
I've said what I wanted to say to you thrice now so if you still don't understand you are out of luck, sorry.
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,222
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,223
@770,220 (B)
Well, if reading a whole sentence strains your intellect, then I guess I can't expect you to stay focused through the whole thread.
Well, if reading a whole sentence strains your intellect, then I guess I can't expect you to stay focused through the whole thread.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,226
@770,221 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> I've said what I wanted to say to you thrice now
Yes, you have made quite an idiot of yourself
> I've said what I wanted to say to you thrice now
Yes, you have made quite an idiot of yourself
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,229
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 36 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,234
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,236
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I don't think fossils could exist on the moon. The surface gets fucked up on the daily.
I don't think fossils could exist on the moon. The surface gets fucked up on the daily.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,237
@770,222 (I)
> You're a fucktard.
You again. Lol I see you lost your composure. Still salty from when I made a complete mess of your retarded 'argument' involving...let's see, what waas it you called it? "Lazer-based experiments" LOL! 'Lazer'!! What a fucking retarded dipshit you are.
> You're a fucktard.
You again. Lol I see you lost your composure. Still salty from when I made a complete mess of your retarded 'argument' involving...let's see, what waas it you called it? "Lazer-based experiments" LOL! 'Lazer'!! What a fucking retarded dipshit you are.
Anonymous B double-posted this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,238
@770,236 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> I don't think fossils could exist on the moon. The surface gets fucked up on the daily.
Even by your lofty standards this is a seriously fucking retarded comment. So we can apparently still see Armstrong's footprints and various debris on the lunar surface...and yet fossils can't exist there because the surface "gets fucked up on the daily?" Fucking hell, you are literally a spastic.
> I don't think fossils could exist on the moon. The surface gets fucked up on the daily.
Even by your lofty standards this is a seriously fucking retarded comment. So we can apparently still see Armstrong's footprints and various debris on the lunar surface...and yet fossils can't exist there because the surface "gets fucked up on the daily?" Fucking hell, you are literally a spastic.
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,240
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,242
@previous (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
You have to attain a certain IQ level to be considered hominum (nominative case, retard), so...wrong again, dipshit.
Yo, tell us all more about your theory of how fossils can't exist on the moon because the surface takes a daily lashing (??), but footprints and space capsule debris apparently can.
You have to attain a certain IQ level to be considered hominum (nominative case, retard), so...wrong again, dipshit.
Yo, tell us all more about your theory of how fossils can't exist on the moon because the surface takes a daily lashing (??), but footprints and space capsule debris apparently can.
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,243
@770,238 (B)
The difference is that those footprints haven't had to endure millions of years of comets because it barely has an atmosphere.
The difference is that those footprints haven't had to endure millions of years of comets because it barely has an atmosphere.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,245
@previous (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> millions of years of comets...
...is how you're defining getting "fucked up on the daily"?
> millions of years of comets...
...is how you're defining getting "fucked up on the daily"?
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,247
@770,242 (B)
You should also note that I said i think and wasn't stating a fact. I would love to read something about the possibility of fossils forming on the moon, but I couldn't really find anything
You should also note that I said i think and wasn't stating a fact. I would love to read something about the possibility of fossils forming on the moon, but I couldn't really find anything
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,255
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,278
@770,245 (B)
I was extremely obviously being a bit facetious. Do you have any resources on fossils survivability on the moon mayhaps
I was extremely obviously being a bit facetious. Do you have any resources on fossils survivability on the moon mayhaps
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,289
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,290
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,292
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Well can they? I don't know much about this. I do think it would be very lucky if they just happened to be right at the spot they landed
Well can they? I don't know much about this. I do think it would be very lucky if they just happened to be right at the spot they landed
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ double-posted this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,294
@770,290 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You really can't do ... if your claim is that there is intelligent life on the fucking moon. You also haven't really answered any of the other problems I had with the concept of life on the moon
You really can't do ... if your claim is that there is intelligent life on the fucking moon. You also haven't really answered any of the other problems I had with the concept of life on the moon
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,296
@770,292 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
Maybe they chose that spot for a reason? Maybe it wasnt fossils but detritis left by a prior visitor? I dont know
Maybe they chose that spot for a reason? Maybe it wasnt fossils but detritis left by a prior visitor? I dont know
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,297
@770,294 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
We dont know what sort of life might survive on something with such an atmosphere. Maybe its not carbon based.
We dont know what sort of life might survive on something with such an atmosphere. Maybe its not carbon based.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,298
@770,278 (dw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> I was extremely obviously being a bit facetious.
Lol nice try retard
> Do you have any resources on fossils survivability on the moon mayhaps
I'll try to overlook the fact that this sentence makes absolutely no fucking sense ("resources on fossils"?? Or did you mean to put an apostrophe after "fossils" to mean something like 'information about the survivability of fossils'?) and take a gues you're asking if I have any information about fossils on the moon. To which my answer is no. Once again you're asking me about something Kook is suggesting. Do try to pay attention.
> I was extremely obviously being a bit facetious.
Lol nice try retard
> Do you have any resources on fossils survivability on the moon mayhaps
I'll try to overlook the fact that this sentence makes absolutely no fucking sense ("resources on fossils"?? Or did you mean to put an apostrophe after "fossils" to mean something like 'information about the survivability of fossils'?) and take a gues you're asking if I have any information about fossils on the moon. To which my answer is no. Once again you're asking me about something Kook is suggesting. Do try to pay attention.
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 50 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,312
@770,220 (B)
> > possibly faked.
> >
> > Kook said she thinks we landed
>
> Yes indeed, please try and pay attention, retard.
lol you're being retarded or trolling really well either way congrats
> > possibly faked.
> >
> > Kook said she thinks we landed
>
> Yes indeed, please try and pay attention, retard.
lol you're being retarded or trolling really well either way congrats
Sheila LaBoof (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,327
if the moon has anything, it's spiders
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,332
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,336
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,403
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,455
@previous (I)
@770,242 (B)
> Yo, tell us all more about your theory of how fossils can't exist on the moon because the surface takes a daily lashing (??), but footprints and space capsule debris apparently can.
> your theory
> your
Lol retard!
@770,242 (B)
> Yo, tell us all more about your theory of how fossils can't exist on the moon because the surface takes a daily lashing (??), but footprints and space capsule debris apparently can.
> your theory
> your
Lol retard!
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,461
dw (Retard Clinic in-patient) replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,465
@previous (P)
> There isn't an atmosphere on the moon brah
Yeah we know. That's why all those fossils get blown off its surface. The footprints and the capsule debris are still there only because the astronauts weighed them down with paperweights borrowed from Elvis' mansion on the Sea of Tranquility.
> There isn't an atmosphere on the moon brah
Yeah we know. That's why all those fossils get blown off its surface. The footprints and the capsule debris are still there only because the astronauts weighed them down with paperweights borrowed from Elvis' mansion on the Sea of Tranquility.
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,467
dw (Retard Clinic in-patient) replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,469
@previous (P)
Because the nurse is late with my lunch, leaving me alone to contemplate all those hurricanes and comets which are sweeping fossils off the moon's surface but not the astronauts' footprints.
Because the nurse is late with my lunch, leaving me alone to contemplate all those hurricanes and comets which are sweeping fossils off the moon's surface but not the astronauts' footprints.
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,477
Anonymous O replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,491
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,495
@770,297 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You're right, we don't know that, but you seem very convinced that the moon landing was faked. And so that's based on the extremely slim possibility that there is intelligent (I am assuming they'd have to be intelligent for NASA to consider them something worth hiding), non silicon based life with no traces visible from earth.
You're right, we don't know that, but you seem very convinced that the moon landing was faked. And so that's based on the extremely slim possibility that there is intelligent (I am assuming they'd have to be intelligent for NASA to consider them something worth hiding), non silicon based life with no traces visible from earth.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,508
dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,510
dw (Retard Clinic in-patient) replied with this 9 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,522
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,525
@previous (dw (Retard Clinic in-patient))
So that means you're going around and being unironically hostile all over the board
Contributing nothing
Definition of shitposter
So that means you're going around and being unironically hostile all over the board
Contributing nothing
Definition of shitposter
Anonymous P double-posted this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,526
dw (Retard Clinic in-patient) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,528
@770,525 (P)
> So that means you're going around and being unironically hostile all over the board
The conclusion you've drawn does not follow from the stated premise, you retarded spastic. Stop shitting up the thread with your idiocy.
> So that means you're going around and being unironically hostile all over the board
The conclusion you've drawn does not follow from the stated premise, you retarded spastic. Stop shitting up the thread with your idiocy.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,609
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,610
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,614
@770,609 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
But pictures from the LRO taken in 2004 show with great detail remnants and tracks from the Apollo mission!
But pictures from the LRO taken in 2004 show with great detail remnants and tracks from the Apollo mission!
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,617
@previous (P)
> But pictures from the LRO taken in 2004 show with great detail remnants and tracks from the Apollo mission!
1) But how is this possible if the surface of the moon is blasted every day with a force strong enough to erode fossils?
2) Why are you so confident those "pictures from the LRO taken in 2004" are not faked?
> But pictures from the LRO taken in 2004 show with great detail remnants and tracks from the Apollo mission!
1) But how is this possible if the surface of the moon is blasted every day with a force strong enough to erode fossils?
2) Why are you so confident those "pictures from the LRO taken in 2004" are not faked?
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 54 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,619
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,622
@previous (P)
In other words you can't answer the questions so you're going to respond with anger and aggression. Yup, standard retard behavior.
I don't think anyone else need take you seriously in this thread now. Any time you are given a question you can't answer you simply resort to insults. You're done here.
In other words you can't answer the questions so you're going to respond with anger and aggression. Yup, standard retard behavior.
I don't think anyone else need take you seriously in this thread now. Any time you are given a question you can't answer you simply resort to insults. You're done here.
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,623
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,625
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,627
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,629
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,630
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 47 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,631
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 41 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,632
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 9 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,633
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,634
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,639
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,642
^^ He doesn't answer questions he can't answer. He just starts aggressively insulting people, hoping they will go away and stop making him answer for his ideas.
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,649
@770,639 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Do how could they not have happened if we have photographed them with a source you find reliable?
Do how could they not have happened if we have photographed them with a source you find reliable?
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,653
@previous (P)
> Do how could they not have happened if we have photographed them with a source you find reliable?
Does this sentence even begin to make sense to you?
Regardless, to the point - when you say "we have photographed them", who is 'we' here? You? Because if not, why do you believe these photos you claim to have seen? How do you know they were not faked?
> Do how could they not have happened if we have photographed them with a source you find reliable?
Does this sentence even begin to make sense to you?
Regardless, to the point - when you say "we have photographed them", who is 'we' here? You? Because if not, why do you believe these photos you claim to have seen? How do you know they were not faked?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,718
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,719
@770,649 (P)
> Do how could they not have happened if we have photographed them with a source you find reliable?
What the fuck are you asking here??
> Do how could they not have happened if we have photographed them with a source you find reliable?
What the fuck are you asking here??
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 50 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,729
@770,718 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
We have many photographs of the Apollo mission sites clearly showing the LM, scientific equipment that was left behind, tracks, landing marks, etc. Images from the LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) line up with photographs, video, reports, and all the other things that make up the mountains of evidence for a moon landing. I think Anon P is asking if these images impact your belief that the footage was faked at all.
We have many photographs of the Apollo mission sites clearly showing the LM, scientific equipment that was left behind, tracks, landing marks, etc. Images from the LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) line up with photographs, video, reports, and all the other things that make up the mountains of evidence for a moon landing. I think Anon P is asking if these images impact your belief that the footage was faked at all.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 12 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,861
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,863
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
oh wait
just the footage? like everything happened as normal but they filmed it to be a success just in case?
oh wait
just the footage? like everything happened as normal but they filmed it to be a success just in case?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,897
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,924
Anonymous E replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,947
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,951
@previous (E)
> she thinks we found aliens there.
Can you prove 'we' didn't?
> everybody on this site is fucking retarded
Necessarily including you
> she thinks we found aliens there.
Can you prove 'we' didn't?
> everybody on this site is fucking retarded
Necessarily including you
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #770,998
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 9 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,136
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,189
@previous (P)
> Why?
Why we found aliens? Err...maybe because they were in the same place 'we' were? That tends to be why things get found. Your questions get more nonsensical by the day.
> Why?
Why we found aliens? Err...maybe because they were in the same place 'we' were? That tends to be why things get found. Your questions get more nonsensical by the day.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,206
Why not just work on a Final Solution, OP?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,218
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 46 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,227
Dw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,229
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 33 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,256
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 9 years ago, 18 seconds later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,257
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,267
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 27 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,270
@previous (P)
She already explained her answer to that. You realise you're repeating the same questions over and over again now?
She already explained her answer to that. You realise you're repeating the same questions over and over again now?
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,285
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,291
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
The moon was visited and revisited, and the lunar surface has been extensively imaged by astronauts, orbiters, and telescopes. It's safe to say there isn't anything so huge (giant pyramids, cities, landing tracks from a gargantuan mothership, etc.) that it would have to be concealed in a big way. We know that the Apollo missions had cameras and video equipment with them on the mission. Even supposing they found something, why wouldn't they just take photos and footage of regular mission activities anyway? Even if there was a giant alien spaceship that landed next to them that they needed to cover up, what is preventing them from just pointing the camera somewhere else?
Given the time and cost of making realistic moon landing footage in 1969, they would have had to fake the footage well ahead of time too. If that's the case, then do you think they were planning on finding something and had fake footage ready? And why would the footage faked before we ever went to the moon look so similar to footage and images taken by later Apollo missions?
The moon was visited and revisited, and the lunar surface has been extensively imaged by astronauts, orbiters, and telescopes. It's safe to say there isn't anything so huge (giant pyramids, cities, landing tracks from a gargantuan mothership, etc.) that it would have to be concealed in a big way. We know that the Apollo missions had cameras and video equipment with them on the mission. Even supposing they found something, why wouldn't they just take photos and footage of regular mission activities anyway? Even if there was a giant alien spaceship that landed next to them that they needed to cover up, what is preventing them from just pointing the camera somewhere else?
Given the time and cost of making realistic moon landing footage in 1969, they would have had to fake the footage well ahead of time too. If that's the case, then do you think they were planning on finding something and had fake footage ready? And why would the footage faked before we ever went to the moon look so similar to footage and images taken by later Apollo missions?
Anonymous P replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #771,295
Yeah what he said