I don't believe that. I'm so fed up of all the personal shit like "trolling" and obsessions that goes on here and when that's not happening dadrock and gnocchi is happening.
I also hate that I'm in a way caught up in it, like I never wanted any kind of relationship (if you can call it that) but especially not a negative one. And now the whole kl thing. Leaving because me and sophie, like what the fuck did sophie ever do? And okay maybe I did my fair share of the work but kl was a real douche, suddenly friendly and then not friendly at all.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,251
@769,243 (Meta M³)
I always explain to people that gnocchi is not pasta, it's potatoes.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,255
@769,248 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
You're actually kind of amusing at times. Sophie comes off as a drooling emotional cripple writing bad fanfic about pseudo-intellectual conspiracy theories. That can be funny at times too.
KL survived mountainman and Matt's drunken schtick floods. There were probably other factors involved.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,258
It's good that i amused you, but like right there, why did you have to go and describe your impression of sophie that way? It's like mc is a mini club where we gang upon people, sometimes when they are simply answering back.
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 29 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,262
Probably
Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,264
@769,258 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E) > why did you have to go and describe your impression of sophie that way?
Because that's my impression. It's a funny shtick. I hope it's a shtick.
Insults are pretty much par for the course on the Internet though, and I don't expect anyone to take anything here too seriously.
Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,266
The people in the suicide thread and dog fucking thread look up to us as role models. The angel summoners probably not so much
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,292
@769,255 (M)
I am almost certain that you are projecting insofar as the "emotional cripple" claim at the very least.
Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 30 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,297
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs) > I am almost certain that you are projecting insofar as the "emotional cripple" claim at the very least.
Perfect example. It's that "no you are" mentality that makes it feel like you are drawing from all the emotional depth of a ten year old.
Sophie !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,298
@previous (M)
You've yet to demonstrate anything bordering on emotionl depth. It doesn't take projection to observe just how sociopathic you are.
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 55 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#769,301