Topic: Best way to quieten a woman who is crying hysterically
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #60,672
Hold your hand up half a yard from her face in a backhand position and yell "DO YOU WANT ANOTHER ONE?"
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later[^] [v] #769,165
what came to mind was "the bitch slap"
wait, "another one"?
wait, "another one"?
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,189
No you should start crying in front of her
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,192
what do you tell a woman with two black eyes?
nothing...she has already been told twice..
nothing...she has already been told twice..
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #769,193
Bert says, "Threaten to rape her."
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,246
@previous (The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM)
a related suggestion would be a soother, those nipple things that babies suck on, but the soother is instead your cock
a related suggestion would be a soother, those nipple things that babies suck on, but the soother is instead your cock
The Witch Doctor !6W1Zpe4MCM joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,247
> quieten
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,253
It depends if they are manipulation tears, or regular tears
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,277
Keep crying and I'll give you something to cry about
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,280
Ya wanna fresh one??Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,285
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 49 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,290
Because abusing women is sooooooo hilarious.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,306
@previous (J)
> Because abusing women is sooooooo hilarious.
Millennial libtard social justice crusader detected
> Because abusing women is sooooooo hilarious.
Millennial libtard social justice crusader detected
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,311
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,312
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,329
@769,280 (I)
Yeah, that's a stunning strike. She must have done something major to deserve that. For small things a simple forehand or backhand smash across the mouth is usually sufficient but to go straight for the uppercut to the cunt, she probably pulled some of that female crap like getting in his face and whining about her 'needs' or some shit.
Yeah, that's a stunning strike. She must have done something major to deserve that. For small things a simple forehand or backhand smash across the mouth is usually sufficient but to go straight for the uppercut to the cunt, she probably pulled some of that female crap like getting in his face and whining about her 'needs' or some shit.
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,331
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 49 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,332
@769,285 (D)
This is good technique also. Ideally you want the head to whip back and expose the other cheek so you can catch that one on the return backhand.
This is good technique also. Ideally you want the head to whip back and expose the other cheek so you can catch that one on the return backhand.
hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,360
@769,306 (A)
> > Because abusing women is sooooooo hilarious.
>
> Millennial libtard social justice crusader detected
you have to be a libtard social justice crusader to point out that beating women isn't funny!? no. just a remotely decent human sorry
kys
> > Because abusing women is sooooooo hilarious.
>
> Millennial libtard social justice crusader detected
you have to be a libtard social justice crusader to point out that beating women isn't funny!? no. just a remotely decent human sorry
kys
hot toddy double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,361
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,368
@769,360 (hot toddy)
Mewling apoplectic outburst about what it means to be a "decent human being"? Check!
Tells someone to kill themselves in literally the following sentence? Check!
Millennial libtard with zero self-awareness? CHECK!
Mewling apoplectic outburst about what it means to be a "decent human being"? Check!
Tells someone to kill themselves in literally the following sentence? Check!
Millennial libtard with zero self-awareness? CHECK!
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,369
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,372
@769,306 (A)
@769,311 (K)
It's okay, I'm sure you're the forever friendzoned types anyway.
@769,331 (D)
No surprise that you'd support this thread.
@769,311 (K)
It's okay, I'm sure you're the forever friendzoned types anyway.
@769,331 (D)
No surprise that you'd support this thread.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 45 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #769,384
@previous (J)
> No surprise that you'd support this thread.
If a woman didn't want to be beaten by her man she would simply leave the relationship. Respect a woman's choice.
> No surprise that you'd support this thread.
If a woman didn't want to be beaten by her man she would simply leave the relationship. Respect a woman's choice.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 month later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,627
@769,369 (hot toddy)
I say again:
Mewling apoplectic lecture about what it means to be a "decent human being"? Check!
Tells someone to kill themselves in literally the following sentence? Check!
Millennial libtard with zero self-awareness? CHECK!
I say again:
Mewling apoplectic lecture about what it means to be a "decent human being"? Check!
Tells someone to kill themselves in literally the following sentence? Check!
Millennial libtard with zero self-awareness? CHECK!
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,628
I'm not against a beating women joke occassionally but this is unfunny and unoriginal. Sorry!
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,631
Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,632
Anonymous M double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,633
Also is "quieten" dadrock slang too?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,634
@782,632 (M)
@previous (M)
So you're an illiterate retard with the lexicon of a 6 year old. Cool, thanks, that'll be all.
@previous (M)
So you're an illiterate retard with the lexicon of a 6 year old. Cool, thanks, that'll be all.
Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,635
Anonymous M double-posted this 9 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,636
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,637
@782,635 (M)
Yes. Adding the 'en' suffix to a noun or adjective can make it into a verb (shorten, lengthen, heighten, etc).
This is usually taught to children when they're around 4 or 5 years old.
Yes. Adding the 'en' suffix to a noun or adjective can make it into a verb (shorten, lengthen, heighten, etc).
This is usually taught to children when they're around 4 or 5 years old.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,638
@782,636 (M)
> Apparently it is
> Are you 60?
LOL so you made yourself look like a fucking moron and now you're going for the "You must be really old to, like, know shit!" What a fucking retard you are.
> Apparently it is
> Are you 60?
LOL so you made yourself look like a fucking moron and now you're going for the "You must be really old to, like, know shit!" What a fucking retard you are.
Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,639
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,640
@previous (M)
> Literally everyone born after 1880 just uses quiet as the verb though
Demonstrably false. And even if true, where then does being "60" enter into it? You're innumerate as well as illiterate? LOL dude you are really flailing here.
> Literally everyone born after 1880 just uses quiet as the verb though
Demonstrably false. And even if true, where then does being "60" enter into it? You're innumerate as well as illiterate? LOL dude you are really flailing here.
Anonymous M replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,641
@previous (A)
I did some research and apparently this thread is the first usage of the word since the sixth of June, 1880. The sixty was just my initial guess
I did some research and apparently this thread is the first usage of the word since the sixth of June, 1880. The sixty was just my initial guess
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,643
@previous (M)
> I did some research and apparently this thread is the first usage of the word since the sixth of June, 1880. The sixty was just my initial guess
That's some forensic research you did there retard, LOL!
http://punchng.com/father-of-two-shoots-neighbours-18-month-old-baby-to-quieten-him/
It was always going to take a stellar performance, but I think we may actually now have our new all-time retard champion. Congrats, Anon M!
> I did some research and apparently this thread is the first usage of the word since the sixth of June, 1880. The sixty was just my initial guess
That's some forensic research you did there retard, LOL!
http://punchng.com/father-of-two-shoots-neighbours-18-month-old-baby-to-quieten-him/
It was always going to take a stellar performance, but I think we may actually now have our new all-time retard champion. Congrats, Anon M!
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,667
Sure is dadrock in here
Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,679
@782,627 (A)
> I say again:
>
> Mewling apoplectic lecture about what it means to be a "decent human being"? Check!
> Tells someone to kill themselves in literally the following sentence? Check!
>
> Millennial libtard with zero self-awareness? CHECK!
> 1 month ago
what is that, you retarded spastic?? LOL
> I say again:
>
> Mewling apoplectic lecture about what it means to be a "decent human being"? Check!
> Tells someone to kill themselves in literally the following sentence? Check!
>
> Millennial libtard with zero self-awareness? CHECK!
> 1 month ago
what is that, you retarded spastic?? LOL
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,689
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #782,690
wow how edgy of you