Minichan

Topic: So it appears that Evidence is indeed negroidal

Sophie started this discussion 9 years ago #60,413

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-38103849

Lol at the interviewee's first name.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #766,139

So would you say you just found evidence to proof your theory?

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #766,141

@previous (B)
Yes, and in one of the most negroidatical ways possible; the BBC (Big Black Conmunist) fake news organization.

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #766,142

@previous (Sophie)
So its not fake news if you agree with it?

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #766,143

@previous (B)
The problem is that Zimbabwe is a fake word salad country whose name was dreamt in the mind of a negro (Mugabe). Until I see reports on Rhodesia, it's fake news.

Meta M³ joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #766,144

Are you going to get your weewee chopped off or what?

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 47 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #766,145

@previous (Meta M³)
How would you know? Would I require Evidence to show you?

Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #766,151

@766,143 (Sophie)
So then why are you giving weight to the article

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #766,152

@previous (B)
It was intended to be a joke. Much like the country from whence the report originates.

hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,196

@766,143 (Sophie)

> The problem is that Zimbabwe is a fake word salad country whose name was dreamt in the mind of a negro (Mugabe). Until I see reports on Rhodesia, it's fake news.

kys

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,198

@previous (hot toddy)
OP is just building the walls of his fantasy land ever higher so he doesn't have to catch a glimpse of reality by accident. I'm trying to figure out if he'll succeed in walling himself off entirely into schizophrenia or having some kind of massive breakdown when fantasia finally comes crumbling down. In the meantime, it's entertainment.

hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,199

@previous (E)
usually I'd say that's mean or bad but autphag does this to himself

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,200

@766,152 (Sophie)

> from whence

Whence means 'from where' so to say 'from whence' is logically redundant and, frankly, idiotic.

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,202

@previous (F)
Did I ask for armchair grammarians to autistically nitpick at irrelevant detail in my posts?

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,204

@previous (Sophie)

> Did I ask for armchair grammarians to autistically nitpick at irrelevant detail in my posts?

No, I find it riles you up more if I do it when you haven't asked.

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,206

@previous (F)
I am unperturbed, I just find it contemptible that you would stoop to bitching about superficial, commonly-made faults with my writing that nobody other than you could give a shit about.

Whatever, let your autistic alexithymia run with the wind in misinterpreting the motives for my responses. How would you know? Lol.

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,208

@previous (Sophie)

> I am unperturbed, I just find it contemptible that you would stoop to bitching about superficial, commonly-made faults with my writing that nobody other than you could give a shit about.
>
> Whatever, let your autistic alexithymia run with the wind in misinterpreting the motives for my responses. How would you know? Lol.

I read this as "I am a raging spastic".

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,210

@previous (F)
When have you never autistically misread into everything?

Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,211

@previous (Sophie)

> misread into

There should be no preposition after 'misread'. One misreads things, one does not misread into them.

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,212

@previous (F)

> > misread into
>
> There should be no preposition after 'misread'. One misreads things, one does not misread into them.

Show me the relevant rule that what on its face appears to be an unexceptional verb can't be followed with a preposition. Making shit up in desperation does appear to fall within the scope of your MO.

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,216

@previous (Sophie)
he's right tho

Sophie (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #766,217

@previous (hot toddy)
So he says. And I'd like more proof this is the case than a Black chap named Evidence, preferably.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.