Topic: would you like to see some of tgcomix artwork?
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #60,209
Well you can't see it here. It is considered child porn and has been reported and deleted. Why would you want to see a pedophiles drawings of young children having genital examinations?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #764,091
@OP
> Well you can't see it here. It is considered child porn and has been reported and deleted. Why would you want to see a pedophiles drawings of young children having genital examinations?
How do you know, have you seen it?
> Well you can't see it here. It is considered child porn and has been reported and deleted. Why would you want to see a pedophiles drawings of young children having genital examinations?
How do you know, have you seen it?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,092
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,093
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,096
@764,092 (A)
> Yes. The links were posted on scatchan
And you clicked them. So, to sum up, you've clicked on child porn. From now on, instead of "Oh look, it's that guy who rages about TG", you'll be known as "That guy who admitted to watching child porn".
Thanks, that'll be all.
> Yes. The links were posted on scatchan
And you clicked them. So, to sum up, you've clicked on child porn. From now on, instead of "Oh look, it's that guy who rages about TG", you'll be known as "That guy who admitted to watching child porn".
Thanks, that'll be all.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 52 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,097
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,099
@764,093 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
I made the mistake of clicking that CP link to tgcomixs "artwork" it was on Spanish Wikipedia, possibly Portuguese. Apparently he is also called chance blacktown or something and draws some sort of spanking panty porn for video games
I made the mistake of clicking that CP link to tgcomixs "artwork" it was on Spanish Wikipedia, possibly Portuguese. Apparently he is also called chance blacktown or something and draws some sort of spanking panty porn for video games
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 56 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,100
@previous (A)
> I made the mistake of clicking that CP link
Said no successful defending pedophile in court ever.
> I made the mistake of clicking that CP link
Said no successful defending pedophile in court ever.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 49 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,101
@764,096 (B)
Wait, you drew it and posted the link to your "art" and I decided it was CP and argued with you that it was, and you argued that "no children were harmed drawing my picture"
Wait, you drew it and posted the link to your "art" and I decided it was CP and argued with you that it was, and you argued that "no children were harmed drawing my picture"
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,102
@previous (A)
> I decided it was CP
and from your OP...
> it is considered CP
Dear me, you are flailing here, sick nonce. You may want to get your story straight before your court appearance.
> I decided it was CP
and from your OP...
> it is considered CP
Dear me, you are flailing here, sick nonce. You may want to get your story straight before your court appearance.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,103
@764,100 (B)
Yeah. I agree. That's why having tg2pedo around is bad for everyone. He might post links to his art again
Yeah. I agree. That's why having tg2pedo around is bad for everyone. He might post links to his art again
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,104
@previous (A)
> Yeah. I agree. That's why having tg2pedo around is bad for everyone. He might post links to his art again
I happen to agree with you 100%. But that doesn't justify your viewing child pornography, filthy nonce.
> Yeah. I agree. That's why having tg2pedo around is bad for everyone. He might post links to his art again
I happen to agree with you 100%. But that doesn't justify your viewing child pornography, filthy nonce.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 46 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,106
@764,102 (B)
I looked at it and made up my own mind. In the following discussion about whether it was CP someone posted a link to the law that clearly defined it as CP. Thanks
I looked at it and made up my own mind. In the following discussion about whether it was CP someone posted a link to the law that clearly defined it as CP. Thanks
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 48 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,107
@previous (A)
> I looked at it
Yeah we know. Sick fucking pedophile, fuck off and kill yourself before you harm a child.
> I looked at it
Yeah we know. Sick fucking pedophile, fuck off and kill yourself before you harm a child.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,108
Tricking people into viewing your "art" doesn't make those people pedophiles.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,111
@previous (A)
> Tricking people into viewing your "art" doesn't make those people pedophiles.
Said no successful defending pedophile in court ever.
> Tricking people into viewing your "art" doesn't make those people pedophiles.
Said no successful defending pedophile in court ever.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 54 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,112
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,115
@previous (A)
No, from an amused and assenting appreciation and knowledge of how many filthy nonces like you get convicted every year for "accidentally" clicking on child porn.
No, from an amused and assenting appreciation and knowledge of how many filthy nonces like you get convicted every year for "accidentally" clicking on child porn.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,122
@previous (B)
Do you think tg should be banned, so he doesn't post links to his "art" again?
Do you think tg should be banned, so he doesn't post links to his "art" again?
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,124
@previous (A)
> Do you think tg should be banned, so he doesn't post links to his "art" again?
Yes I do, he's a dirty nonce, like you.
> Do you think tg should be banned, so he doesn't post links to his "art" again?
Yes I do, he's a dirty nonce, like you.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #764,126
dreamworks !vJwW0tsPXQ joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,145
You should post some of your sfw artwork tg
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 13 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,647
@previous (dreamworks !vJwW0tsPXQ)
TG once posted some "art" that was sfw. But McWalter called him out for it being a shitty knock off of a Star Track symbol.
TG once posted some "art" that was sfw. But McWalter called him out for it being a shitty knock off of a Star Track symbol.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,651
@OP
I remember him trying to defend his his kiddy diddler doodles as "art." He even tried to portray himself as a champion of free speech. The whole thing was just sad and disgusting in the end... much like TG himself.
I remember him trying to defend his his kiddy diddler doodles as "art." He even tried to portray himself as a champion of free speech. The whole thing was just sad and disgusting in the end... much like TG himself.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,658
becky @ mcdonalds joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,661
hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,721
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,740
I thought that guy only drew shemales
beckyderp !yDoooooooo replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,744
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,761
@764,661 (becky @ mcdonalds)
Now that you mention it I've never seen them together at the same time.
Now that you mention it I've never seen them together at the same time.