Topic: Sheeple's just buttmad because his alt-right leader Milo Yanialollapalooza was fired from Breitbart.
Meta started this discussion 9 years ago #60,165
For being a pedophile. Where's your god-emperor now? ?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later[^] [v] #763,638
It was a CIA orchestrated character assassination!
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #763,641
He's not a pedo though. The Jews are just going full out on him.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 31 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #763,642
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,663
It's all very retarded. The fag was getting money and jobs and open doors for saying all kinds of nonsense and bullshit (and some good points) but when he reveals secret information that fags like twinks, oh that's just too much to bear.
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,665
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Milo was molested when he was young. He said it wasn't that traumatic. That's it.
Milo was molested when he was young. He said it wasn't that traumatic. That's it.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,670
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,671
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,672
@previous (C)
I thought he was in trouble with former associates and book publishers for various things he was saying during interviews such as with Joe Rogan, not for being molested and liking it
I thought he was in trouble with former associates and book publishers for various things he was saying during interviews such as with Joe Rogan, not for being molested and liking it
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,682
Milo is a gigantic retard, but the whole story around him is even more retarded.
I'm more sorry for pewdiepie, jews targeting him for a ruse. The video made me laugh tho, 11 minutes of pure entertainment.
I'm more sorry for pewdiepie, jews targeting him for a ruse. The video made me laugh tho, 11 minutes of pure entertainment.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,690
The Jews literally cause everything.
Udw !vJwW0tsPXQ joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,691
@763,682 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
You can't keep using jew just to refer to the media if you are also claiming that you aren't a racist
You can't keep using jew just to refer to the media if you are also claiming that you aren't a racist
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #763,692
Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,694
Anonymous C replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,695
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,745
@763,691 (Udw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
But the jews did target him. Walt disney dropped him (CEO Bob Iger, jew), after the jewish owned media started all the smearing. And again, yes I know, stating facts is racist and anti semitic.
But the jews did target him. Walt disney dropped him (CEO Bob Iger, jew), after the jewish owned media started all the smearing. And again, yes I know, stating facts is racist and anti semitic.
Udw !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,746
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,753
@763,745 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
So you think that the Disney CEO was sat at a table with all the big bad media Jews and agreed to destroy Pewdiepie, perhaps whilst cackling?
So you think that the Disney CEO was sat at a table with all the big bad media Jews and agreed to destroy Pewdiepie, perhaps whilst cackling?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 30 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,767
@763,745 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
"The Jews" didn't target him. Journalists at the WSJ wrote an article accusing him of basically exhibiting Nazi sympathies. This article was reviewed by editors and who knows how many other employees at the WSJ before it was published. Then, in response to that, Disney, a family-friendly company that tries very hard to present an uncontroversial public image, dropped him, because even a hint of Nazism is well beyond what they're willing to accept. Now both parties could have erred. Maybe the WSJ was unfair towards him and maybe Disney jumped the gun and reacted without thinking, but notice how zero of this is "Jews". It's corporations that happen to be owned by Jews. That's a pretty big distinction. When you say "the jews" do something you are implying some kind of planning or coordination between the various Jewish players. There is no evidence of that here but you keep using the phrase for reasons I cannot attribute to anything but bad faith or malice. The phrase is also a cop out for having to understand the reasons things happen. Why did PewDiePie get dropped by Disney?
Hypothesis 1: Da J00z!!!!!
Hypothesis 2: the scenario I laid out in my first couple sentences.
One of those is informative and a starting point for arguments or discussion. I lay out specific points. They may be right or they may be wrong but they are concrete debatable points. "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion because to believe it one has to adopt an entire belief system about the role Jews play in the world stage. There is no debating the merits, and there is no explanatory value offered as to why a particular thing did or did not happen. I hope at least some of this makes sense to you but it's really tiresome reading you type "the Jews" at every turn when it provides no explanatory or rhetorical value.
"The Jews" didn't target him. Journalists at the WSJ wrote an article accusing him of basically exhibiting Nazi sympathies. This article was reviewed by editors and who knows how many other employees at the WSJ before it was published. Then, in response to that, Disney, a family-friendly company that tries very hard to present an uncontroversial public image, dropped him, because even a hint of Nazism is well beyond what they're willing to accept. Now both parties could have erred. Maybe the WSJ was unfair towards him and maybe Disney jumped the gun and reacted without thinking, but notice how zero of this is "Jews". It's corporations that happen to be owned by Jews. That's a pretty big distinction. When you say "the jews" do something you are implying some kind of planning or coordination between the various Jewish players. There is no evidence of that here but you keep using the phrase for reasons I cannot attribute to anything but bad faith or malice. The phrase is also a cop out for having to understand the reasons things happen. Why did PewDiePie get dropped by Disney?
Hypothesis 1: Da J00z!!!!!
Hypothesis 2: the scenario I laid out in my first couple sentences.
One of those is informative and a starting point for arguments or discussion. I lay out specific points. They may be right or they may be wrong but they are concrete debatable points. "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion because to believe it one has to adopt an entire belief system about the role Jews play in the world stage. There is no debating the merits, and there is no explanatory value offered as to why a particular thing did or did not happen. I hope at least some of this makes sense to you but it's really tiresome reading you type "the Jews" at every turn when it provides no explanatory or rhetorical value.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 15 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,768
@763,746 (Udw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
> Do you honestly not see that your phrasing is retarded?
Says the idiot.
> Do you honestly not see that your phrasing is retarded?
Says the idiot.
hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,770
@763,746 (Udw !vJwW0tsPXQ)
he's pretty much a Sophie level retard now
facts are racist. facts are negroidal. let's have some alternative facts
anything but you know
facts
he's pretty much a Sophie level retard now
facts are racist. facts are negroidal. let's have some alternative facts
anything but you know
facts
hot toddy double-posted this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,771
@763,767 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
mark. he was dropped by Disney. Disney is run by 1 jew. how is it incorrect to say THE JEWS TARGETED MILO. JEWS.
mark. he was dropped by Disney. Disney is run by 1 jew. how is it incorrect to say THE JEWS TARGETED MILO. JEWS.
JEWS
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,772
@763,767 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion
No it isn't. "The Nazis carried out the Holocaust" is not inimical to discussing the Holocaust, now is it?
> because to believe it one has to adopt an entire belief system about the role Jews play in the world stage
No one doesn't.
> There is no debating the merits, and there is no explanatory value offered as to why a particular thing did or did not happen.
Yes there is. "The Romans crucified Christ" does not preclude discussion of why.
> I hope at least some of this makes sense
It didn't.
> "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion
No it isn't. "The Nazis carried out the Holocaust" is not inimical to discussing the Holocaust, now is it?
> because to believe it one has to adopt an entire belief system about the role Jews play in the world stage
No one doesn't.
> There is no debating the merits, and there is no explanatory value offered as to why a particular thing did or did not happen.
Yes there is. "The Romans crucified Christ" does not preclude discussion of why.
> I hope at least some of this makes sense
It didn't.
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,773
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,774
@763,772 (J)
> > "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion
>
> No it isn't. "The Nazis carried out the Holocaust" is not inimical to discussing the Holocaust, now is it?
Yes it is.
> > because to believe it one has to adopt an entire belief system about the role Jews play in the world stage
>
> No one doesn't.
Yes one does.
> > There is no debating the merits, and there is no explanatory value offered as to why a particular thing did or did not happen.
>
> Yes there is. "The Romans crucified Christ" does not preclude discussion of why.
No there isn't.
> > I hope at least some of this makes sense
>
> It didn't.
It did.
> > "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion
>
> No it isn't. "The Nazis carried out the Holocaust" is not inimical to discussing the Holocaust, now is it?
Yes it is.
> > because to believe it one has to adopt an entire belief system about the role Jews play in the world stage
>
> No one doesn't.
Yes one does.
> > There is no debating the merits, and there is no explanatory value offered as to why a particular thing did or did not happen.
>
> Yes there is. "The Romans crucified Christ" does not preclude discussion of why.
No there isn't.
> > I hope at least some of this makes sense
>
> It didn't.
It did.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,776
@763,773 (hot toddy)
I kept it simple especially for you and yet you still weren't able to follow the logic?
FA's screed didn't deserve a more in-depth annihilation because his premises were so, dare I say it, undergraduate-standard. When he makes the effort to strengthen his position I'll favor him with further insight into where he keeps going wrong.
I kept it simple especially for you and yet you still weren't able to follow the logic?
FA's screed didn't deserve a more in-depth annihilation because his premises were so, dare I say it, undergraduate-standard. When he makes the effort to strengthen his position I'll favor him with further insight into where he keeps going wrong.
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 36 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,777
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,779
@763,774 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> > > "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion
> >
> > No it isn't. "The Nazis carried out the Holocaust" is not inimical to discussing the Holocaust, now is it?
> Yes it is.
So you're saying the Nazis didn't carry out the Holocaust? Deary deary me, modern American liberal arts education these days, eh?
> > > "The Jews did it" is inherently inimical to discussion
> >
> > No it isn't. "The Nazis carried out the Holocaust" is not inimical to discussing the Holocaust, now is it?
> Yes it is.
So you're saying the Nazis didn't carry out the Holocaust? Deary deary me, modern American liberal arts education these days, eh?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,783
@previous (J)
The person I initially replied to actually doesn't believe the Holocaust happened as the history books say. He thinks a couple thousand Jews max, died mostly due to diseases. To the extent that there was a Holocaust it was caused by viruses, not Nazis.
The difference is of course that the Holocaust is a well established historical fact that does not require believing in conspiracy theories to accept. The same cannot be said of "the Jews did it" which was part of my post. If you had done more than skim it you would have known that.
The person I initially replied to actually doesn't believe the Holocaust happened as the history books say. He thinks a couple thousand Jews max, died mostly due to diseases. To the extent that there was a Holocaust it was caused by viruses, not Nazis.
The difference is of course that the Holocaust is a well established historical fact that does not require believing in conspiracy theories to accept. The same cannot be said of "the Jews did it" which was part of my post. If you had done more than skim it you would have known that.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,788
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> The person I initially replied to actually doesn't believe the Holocaust happened as the history books say.
Are you willing to entertain the notion that he may be right?
> He thinks a couple thousand Jews max, died mostly due to diseases. To the extent that there was a Holocaust it was caused by viruses, not Nazis.
So let him express that and show himself to be ignorant on the subject. But to suggest his saying "The Jews did it" precludes discussion is demonstrably wrong, and no amount of your shifting the goalposts of your initial post will change that.
> If you had done more than skim it you would have known that.
Use a mixed conditional construction here, not the 3rd conditional. You want to tie a past action to a present result: "If you had done more than skim it, you would know that".
Not for the first time I despair of modern liberal education.
> The person I initially replied to actually doesn't believe the Holocaust happened as the history books say.
Are you willing to entertain the notion that he may be right?
> He thinks a couple thousand Jews max, died mostly due to diseases. To the extent that there was a Holocaust it was caused by viruses, not Nazis.
So let him express that and show himself to be ignorant on the subject. But to suggest his saying "The Jews did it" precludes discussion is demonstrably wrong, and no amount of your shifting the goalposts of your initial post will change that.
> If you had done more than skim it you would have known that.
Use a mixed conditional construction here, not the 3rd conditional. You want to tie a past action to a present result: "If you had done more than skim it, you would know that".
Not for the first time I despair of modern liberal education.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,791
@previous (J)
> Are you willing to entertain the notion that he may be right?
No.
> So let him express that and show himself to be ignorant on the subject.
I have never stopped him. I am giving him my perspective on why I feel he's wrong to use the words he does. That, as you know, is a proposition which can be debated. I don't know where you get this idea that I am trying to kill his speech when clearly I'm not, but it does show a lack of understanding on your part.
> Use a mixed conditional construction here, not the 3rd conditional
No. I will type in a way that feels natural to me. If I were writing an essay or a research proposal, I would check my grammar six ways from Sunday. A forum post is not a place that warrants technical perfection in writing.
> Are you willing to entertain the notion that he may be right?
No.
> So let him express that and show himself to be ignorant on the subject.
I have never stopped him. I am giving him my perspective on why I feel he's wrong to use the words he does. That, as you know, is a proposition which can be debated. I don't know where you get this idea that I am trying to kill his speech when clearly I'm not, but it does show a lack of understanding on your part.
> Use a mixed conditional construction here, not the 3rd conditional
No. I will type in a way that feels natural to me. If I were writing an essay or a research proposal, I would check my grammar six ways from Sunday. A forum post is not a place that warrants technical perfection in writing.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 39 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,792
@763,767 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> It's corporations that happen to be owned by Jews.
Ah yeah, I forgot, you're a lawyer. Technically yes, legal entities without a religion or an ethnicity targeted him. I'm sorry.
> It's corporations that happen to be owned by Jews.
Ah yeah, I forgot, you're a lawyer. Technically yes, legal entities without a religion or an ethnicity targeted him. I'm sorry.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,794
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
If that's the only thing you took out of my post then you don't warrant any more of my time or energy. I'm sorry!
If that's the only thing you took out of my post then you don't warrant any more of my time or energy. I'm sorry!
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 15 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,796
@763,783 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> The person I initially replied to actually doesn't believe the Holocaust happened as the history books say. He thinks a couple thousand Jews max, died mostly due to diseases.
And this is where you're jumping to conclusions again, being the ignorant retard you always are. I never said a concrete number, I never said it was just death by viruses etc. I just told you the numbers don't add up and are, according to maths and laws of physics, impossible to pull of, and I wonder why "the jews" don't let anyone investigate so we could finally get real numbers.
Fake anon, stop being such a tool, stop putting words into my mouth, stop spreading fabricated fake news about me. Thanks.
> The person I initially replied to actually doesn't believe the Holocaust happened as the history books say. He thinks a couple thousand Jews max, died mostly due to diseases.
And this is where you're jumping to conclusions again, being the ignorant retard you always are. I never said a concrete number, I never said it was just death by viruses etc. I just told you the numbers don't add up and are, according to maths and laws of physics, impossible to pull of, and I wonder why "the jews" don't let anyone investigate so we could finally get real numbers.
Fake anon, stop being such a tool, stop putting words into my mouth, stop spreading fabricated fake news about me. Thanks.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,798
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
Man take a chill pill and go to bed or something. You're lashing out at me because I mischaracterized your Holocaust revisionism and that's like a flat earther being mad at me because I said he thought it was a square and actually he believes it's a trapezoid. It's still just as wrong but taking it personally doesn't help anyone. It just makes you look angry and misinformed, instead of merely misinformed.
Man take a chill pill and go to bed or something. You're lashing out at me because I mischaracterized your Holocaust revisionism and that's like a flat earther being mad at me because I said he thought it was a square and actually he believes it's a trapezoid. It's still just as wrong but taking it personally doesn't help anyone. It just makes you look angry and misinformed, instead of merely misinformed.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,800
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,802
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 3 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,803
@763,798 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I take it personal when people spread lies about me. Choke on a bag of dicks, I've been civilized long enough while arguing with you. Apparently nothing gets to you other than calling you the retard you are.
> WAAAAH WAAAAH MUUUH FEEELINGS, TONE IT DOWN, I JUST ALWAYS CALL YOU AN IDIOT, MORON, RETARD... BUT DON'T DO THAT TO ME WWWAAAAAH :'^(
Fuck off.
I take it personal when people spread lies about me. Choke on a bag of dicks, I've been civilized long enough while arguing with you. Apparently nothing gets to you other than calling you the retard you are.
> WAAAAH WAAAAH MUUUH FEEELINGS, TONE IT DOWN, I JUST ALWAYS CALL YOU AN IDIOT, MORON, RETARD... BUT DON'T DO THAT TO ME WWWAAAAAH :'^(
Fuck off.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,804
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
Ok have a good night bud. I hope whatever's stressing you out gets resolved!
Ok have a good night bud. I hope whatever's stressing you out gets resolved!
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,807
@763,802 (hot toddy)
Volume of gas chamber vs. amount of bodies needed to be gassed. You can not .zip/.rar people IRL so more of them could fit into a gas chamber.
Then there's the issue of oven technology used to burn the gassed bodies. The amount of ovens isn't enough to manage and burn all the millions down.
Nazis would have been breaking laws of physics if they wanted to pull off even current numbers. And those are revised numbers, the first ones were even higher by like, 5 times.
Volume of gas chamber vs. amount of bodies needed to be gassed. You can not .zip/.rar people IRL so more of them could fit into a gas chamber.
Then there's the issue of oven technology used to burn the gassed bodies. The amount of ovens isn't enough to manage and burn all the millions down.
Nazis would have been breaking laws of physics if they wanted to pull off even current numbers. And those are revised numbers, the first ones were even higher by like, 5 times.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 26 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,809
@763,791 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> >Are you willing to entertain the notion that he may be right?
> No.
And yet it is you who accused him of not being open to ideas which challenge his own.
And I see that now you have resorted to telling him to go away, go to bed, etc. What a surprise. As always with you liberals, you're guilty of the very thing you project onto others.
> >Are you willing to entertain the notion that he may be right?
> No.
And yet it is you who accused him of not being open to ideas which challenge his own.
And I see that now you have resorted to telling him to go away, go to bed, etc. What a surprise. As always with you liberals, you're guilty of the very thing you project onto others.
Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,814
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 18 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,816
@763,804 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Ok have a good night bud. I hope whatever's stressing you out gets resolved!
Oh yeah, and this whole labored 'go get some rest and calm down' thing you libs always seem to be left with when all else has failed? It makes you look kind of stupid, buddy. Just sayin'.
> Ok have a good night bud. I hope whatever's stressing you out gets resolved!
Oh yeah, and this whole labored 'go get some rest and calm down' thing you libs always seem to be left with when all else has failed? It makes you look kind of stupid, buddy. Just sayin'.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,817
@763,804 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It's funny that I'm the upset one when I call you a retard, and I should go to sleep. But when you sperg out and call me names, it's all in the heat of the discussion blah blah blah.
My day was really good, still is. I'm coming to an agreement with my neighbour about buying her house and land, so I can expand my backyard here. I'm actually rather happy, you are just confusing my intolerance for your nifty little lies, with me being upset/sleep deprived etc.
It's funny that I'm the upset one when I call you a retard, and I should go to sleep. But when you sperg out and call me names, it's all in the heat of the discussion blah blah blah.
My day was really good, still is. I'm coming to an agreement with my neighbour about buying her house and land, so I can expand my backyard here. I'm actually rather happy, you are just confusing my intolerance for your nifty little lies, with me being upset/sleep deprived etc.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 20 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,818
@763,809 (J)
I don't understand why you think being open to considering ideas means being open to every idea. I do not reply to Nigerian prince emails asking for my banking details for seven million dollars to confirm its veracity. I do not give any consideration to the idea that the moon is actually a hologram. There are some ideas that are just not worth my time arguing over. Holocaust denialism is just one of those ideas. Particularly because I've been told stories by my parents about their relatives who were murdered by the Nazis. The odds of an internet stranger being able to persuade me that my own mother or her relatives were lying about the slaughter of our family members is so low that I don't find it particularly worthwhile to pursue. We are all selective about what we choose to argue and what we don't. There is nothing awful about that.
I don't understand why you think being open to considering ideas means being open to every idea. I do not reply to Nigerian prince emails asking for my banking details for seven million dollars to confirm its veracity. I do not give any consideration to the idea that the moon is actually a hologram. There are some ideas that are just not worth my time arguing over. Holocaust denialism is just one of those ideas. Particularly because I've been told stories by my parents about their relatives who were murdered by the Nazis. The odds of an internet stranger being able to persuade me that my own mother or her relatives were lying about the slaughter of our family members is so low that I don't find it particularly worthwhile to pursue. We are all selective about what we choose to argue and what we don't. There is nothing awful about that.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,821
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Can you ask your mother why she disapproves investigations into it? Why she is against exhumations? Why doesn't she want to even have a chance of figuring out what exactly happened to her relatives, where exactly they ended up?
I heard stories of croatians, bosnians, serbians... they all wanted exhumations of mass graves when they were found. I'll never forget the desperation in their eyes, to finally know where they ended up, to give it a final goodbye.
And here you are, the jews, calling everyone who seeks the truth, a nazi. Ask your mom those questions...
Can you ask your mother why she disapproves investigations into it? Why she is against exhumations? Why doesn't she want to even have a chance of figuring out what exactly happened to her relatives, where exactly they ended up?
I heard stories of croatians, bosnians, serbians... they all wanted exhumations of mass graves when they were found. I'll never forget the desperation in their eyes, to finally know where they ended up, to give it a final goodbye.
And here you are, the jews, calling everyone who seeks the truth, a nazi. Ask your mom those questions...
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,829
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
You can't imagine why Jews don't want to relive the most traumatic experience they've ever suffered so that people who think they are conniving liars can be made happier? Is that a serious question?
You can't imagine why Jews don't want to relive the most traumatic experience they've ever suffered so that people who think they are conniving liars can be made happier? Is that a serious question?
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,835
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 46 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,836
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
I think it was a harsh but fair restatement of an opinion that is odious to me.
I think it was a harsh but fair restatement of an opinion that is odious to me.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,838
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I think it's as retarded as pretty much everything you posted here ITT.
I think it's as retarded as pretty much everything you posted here ITT.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,839
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,845
@763,818 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> I don't understand why you think being open to considering ideas means being open to every idea.
The likely reason you 'don't understand' that is because that's not what anybody has said. You keep shifting the goalposts. You were asked if you were willing to entertain the notion that he may be right in disagreeing with 'history books'. Only that. You replied "no". Your strawman Nigerian scammer nonsense is an irrelevant analogy.
> I don't understand why you think being open to considering ideas means being open to every idea.
The likely reason you 'don't understand' that is because that's not what anybody has said. You keep shifting the goalposts. You were asked if you were willing to entertain the notion that he may be right in disagreeing with 'history books'. Only that. You replied "no". Your strawman Nigerian scammer nonsense is an irrelevant analogy.
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,852
Andrew Breitbart was Jewish too.
dreamworks !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,962
i would like to point out that idubbbz, the guy who says nigger faggot every other video, is signed to the same network as pewdiepie was
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,968
squeegee joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,973
is the soviet brainwashed eastern european dude implying that the holocaust wasn't as bad as western democracies say it was? i'm shocked. wait, no i'm not. i am absolutely not surprised to know the propaganda spurting anti-capitalist would diminish the suffering of the victims of the worst crime in modern history. i can't imagine why there's this need for people to diminish jewish suffering except to speculate it's paving the way for further persecution of "jews" and other leftist liberals like homosexuals, women and "intellectual elitists."
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,974
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,976
@763,973 (squeegee)
> i can't imagine why there's this need for people to diminish jewish suffering except to speculate it's paving the way for further persecution of "jews" and other leftist liberals like homosexuals, women and "intellectual elitists."
This post needs slightly more histrionic hyperbole. Perhaps add some extra infinitely-divisible sub-categories of people you feel will be slaughtered if differing opinions are allowed to propagate.
> i can't imagine why there's this need for people to diminish jewish suffering except to speculate it's paving the way for further persecution of "jews" and other leftist liberals like homosexuals, women and "intellectual elitists."
This post needs slightly more histrionic hyperbole. Perhaps add some extra infinitely-divisible sub-categories of people you feel will be slaughtered if differing opinions are allowed to propagate.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 44 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,983
@763,974 (Meta)
who's talking about nazis? i'm talking about modern day scapegoating of liberals including jews... where did you get nazis from?
who's talking about nazis? i'm talking about modern day scapegoating of liberals including jews... where did you get nazis from?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,984
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,986
@763,976 (J)
as if the goal of the russians isn't to paint the entire left as dangerous and to persecute them. that is literally what they do in their own country and their propaganda is aiming to spread that ideology to the west. so. nice try comrade, but it'll take more than empty words to discredit reality.
as if the goal of the russians isn't to paint the entire left as dangerous and to persecute them. that is literally what they do in their own country and their propaganda is aiming to spread that ideology to the west. so. nice try comrade, but it'll take more than empty words to discredit reality.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,987
@763,983 (squeegee)
> where did you get nazis from?
From your reference to the Holocaust. The Nazis carried that out. Is the connection still unclear to you?
> where did you get nazis from?
From your reference to the Holocaust. The Nazis carried that out. Is the connection still unclear to you?
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,988
@763,984 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
were liberals not declared enemies by donald trump this last new years? even the "liberal media" are scapegoated. try reading donald trumps twitter sometime, i know it's painful and makes you want to retch but if you don't then you don't really have any idea where you stand when it comes to the president. he might consider you an enemy and you don't even know it.
were liberals not declared enemies by donald trump this last new years? even the "liberal media" are scapegoated. try reading donald trumps twitter sometime, i know it's painful and makes you want to retch but if you don't then you don't really have any idea where you stand when it comes to the president. he might consider you an enemy and you don't even know it.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,989
@763,986 (squeegee)
> as if the goal of the russians isn't to paint the entire left as dangerous and to persecute them.
So first you conflate the Soviet Union (communist, if you weren't aware) with modern Russia, and then you cry about its persecuation of 'the left'?
There are some seriously confused people who rant incoherently on the internet but I'm not sure any of them can hold a candle to you, buddy.
> as if the goal of the russians isn't to paint the entire left as dangerous and to persecute them.
So first you conflate the Soviet Union (communist, if you weren't aware) with modern Russia, and then you cry about its persecuation of 'the left'?
There are some seriously confused people who rant incoherently on the internet but I'm not sure any of them can hold a candle to you, buddy.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,990
@763,987 (J)
sorry, i should be more clear, i know how people around here twist everyone's words and get all incredulous over semantics. silly me. what i should have asked was "what the fuck does the soviet's opinion of the nazis have anything to do with modern day persecution of jewish liberals at the hands of communist russians?"
that should maybe clear things up a bit. what i'm saying is there is a drive to diminish jewish suffering during the holocaust to scapegoat them as liars thus making modern day persecution of jews much more palatable. not only did they "not suffer that much anyway" but they're also all evil thieves stealing from the world with lies and deserve to be punished.
amiright sheeple? do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
let's see what he says.
sorry, i should be more clear, i know how people around here twist everyone's words and get all incredulous over semantics. silly me. what i should have asked was "what the fuck does the soviet's opinion of the nazis have anything to do with modern day persecution of jewish liberals at the hands of communist russians?"
that should maybe clear things up a bit. what i'm saying is there is a drive to diminish jewish suffering during the holocaust to scapegoat them as liars thus making modern day persecution of jews much more palatable. not only did they "not suffer that much anyway" but they're also all evil thieves stealing from the world with lies and deserve to be punished.
amiright sheeple? do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
let's see what he says.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 3 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,991
@763,988 (squeegee)
The Big Daddies Derek support President Trump, and praise him for recognizing the threat that leftist ideology poses to traditional USAmerican society. Thanks.
The Big Daddies Derek support President Trump, and praise him for recognizing the threat that leftist ideology poses to traditional USAmerican society. Thanks.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,992
i'm not conflating anything, you moron. i wasn't the one who brought up the soviets opinion of nazis as a defense of communist russia you imbecile.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,993
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #763,995
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Report discarded. Further frivolous misuse of the reporting system shall result in an administrative fee of $10,000 Derek per offense. Thanks.
Report discarded. Further frivolous misuse of the reporting system shall result in an administrative fee of $10,000 Derek per offense. Thanks.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 43 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,007
COCKS
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,029
@763,990 (squeegee)
> that should maybe clear things up a bit. what i'm saying is there is a drive to diminish jewish suffering during the holocaust to scapegoat them as liars thus making modern day persecution of jews much more palatable. not only did they "not suffer that much anyway" but they're also all evil thieves stealing from the world with lies and deserve to be punished.
>
> amiright sheeple? do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
And here I was, thinking Fake anon was a lousy spin doctor. Quote me where I say "we need to punish jews in this day and age, and that's why I want to prove the holocaust numbers are wrong!"
Even if they were proven to be wrong in their current form, what do you think I would suggest as a punishment? Why do you even think I would suggest punishment? The truth coming out would be more than enough, and the fact that we could perhaps finally have civilized conversations about it.
Fucking lol mate, fake anon and you make it seem as if I'm out to kill every jew on this planet. I'm just annoyed by the fact that I'll get thrown into jail in some countries if I speak up about the holocaust even tho shit doesn't end up.
The biggest mystery remains: why does truth fear investigation?
> that should maybe clear things up a bit. what i'm saying is there is a drive to diminish jewish suffering during the holocaust to scapegoat them as liars thus making modern day persecution of jews much more palatable. not only did they "not suffer that much anyway" but they're also all evil thieves stealing from the world with lies and deserve to be punished.
>
> amiright sheeple? do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
And here I was, thinking Fake anon was a lousy spin doctor. Quote me where I say "we need to punish jews in this day and age, and that's why I want to prove the holocaust numbers are wrong!"
Even if they were proven to be wrong in their current form, what do you think I would suggest as a punishment? Why do you even think I would suggest punishment? The truth coming out would be more than enough, and the fact that we could perhaps finally have civilized conversations about it.
Fucking lol mate, fake anon and you make it seem as if I'm out to kill every jew on this planet. I'm just annoyed by the fact that I'll get thrown into jail in some countries if I speak up about the holocaust even tho shit doesn't end up.
The biggest mystery remains: why does truth fear investigation?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,034
pretty sure that thing was investigated lots, real lots
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 25 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,035
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
no. it's all fake
see @ YouTube video
just GO to Auschwitz yourself and tell me it's possible. physics says no
no. it's all fake
see @ YouTube video
just GO to Auschwitz yourself and tell me it's possible. physics says no
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 31 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,040
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,053
@763,992 (squeegee)
> you moron...you imbecile...
Ah liberals :) So wonderfully tolerant and respectful of opposing opinions!
> you moron...you imbecile...
Ah liberals :) So wonderfully tolerant and respectful of opposing opinions!
Anonymous J double-posted this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,054
@764,029 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
> And here I was, thinking Fake anon was a lousy spin doctor. Quote me where I say "we need to punish jews in this day and age, and that's why I want to prove the holocaust numbers are wrong!"
He can't quote it because he made it up. It's what the left does when they have no rational argument.
> Even if they were proven to be wrong in their current form, what do you think I would suggest as a punishment? Why do you even think I would suggest punishment? The truth coming out would be more than enough, and the fact that we could perhaps finally have civilized conversations about it.
Liberals are not interested in 'the truth coming out', and they certainly are not interested in having 'civilized conversations' (look at how their only recourse is to resort to ad hominem insults). What they want is to form mobs and shout down anyone who ever dares to voice a differing opinion. Fascism, in other words, the very thing they claim to be most against.
> The biggest mystery remains: why does truth fear investigation?
Liberals fear it, because they are so absolutely sure they are right (see Fake Anon's statement that he will not even entertain the notion that he may be wrong), and any scrutiny of their views may - just may - show them that they are not. And then where will they be? Just raging incoherently with a meaningless degree in one hand and $40,000 of debt in the other, more victims of a system designed to lock them into a cycle of debt, depression and slave labor.
> And here I was, thinking Fake anon was a lousy spin doctor. Quote me where I say "we need to punish jews in this day and age, and that's why I want to prove the holocaust numbers are wrong!"
He can't quote it because he made it up. It's what the left does when they have no rational argument.
> Even if they were proven to be wrong in their current form, what do you think I would suggest as a punishment? Why do you even think I would suggest punishment? The truth coming out would be more than enough, and the fact that we could perhaps finally have civilized conversations about it.
Liberals are not interested in 'the truth coming out', and they certainly are not interested in having 'civilized conversations' (look at how their only recourse is to resort to ad hominem insults). What they want is to form mobs and shout down anyone who ever dares to voice a differing opinion. Fascism, in other words, the very thing they claim to be most against.
> The biggest mystery remains: why does truth fear investigation?
Liberals fear it, because they are so absolutely sure they are right (see Fake Anon's statement that he will not even entertain the notion that he may be wrong), and any scrutiny of their views may - just may - show them that they are not. And then where will they be? Just raging incoherently with a meaningless degree in one hand and $40,000 of debt in the other, more victims of a system designed to lock them into a cycle of debt, depression and slave labor.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,058
@previous (J)
It's not fun when you point out the obvious, I wanna hear that from our scholar Fake anon :(
It's not fun when you point out the obvious, I wanna hear that from our scholar Fake anon :(
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #764,063
squeegee joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,065
@764,029 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
interesting how you didn't answer my question. do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
it's a straight question, how about a straight answer instead of... blaming liberals for asking? the fuck dude. just answer the question you're asked. i take from your "truth coming out" comment that yes, you do believe in global jewish puppet masters... like i said, the rhetoric you spew and the beliefs you've been brainwashed into believing are working to create a climate where persecution isn't just tolerated, but demanded.
unless i'm wrong and you don't believe that global jewish puppet masters control the world and need to be stopped.
i'm going to go ahead and guess that you won't be answering this question directly but instead will answer some other question no one asked and then you'll strut around claiming to have won something and embarassed all liberals of the world. lol dude. just answer the question you're asked.
interesting how you didn't answer my question. do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
it's a straight question, how about a straight answer instead of... blaming liberals for asking? the fuck dude. just answer the question you're asked. i take from your "truth coming out" comment that yes, you do believe in global jewish puppet masters... like i said, the rhetoric you spew and the beliefs you've been brainwashed into believing are working to create a climate where persecution isn't just tolerated, but demanded.
unless i'm wrong and you don't believe that global jewish puppet masters control the world and need to be stopped.
i'm going to go ahead and guess that you won't be answering this question directly but instead will answer some other question no one asked and then you'll strut around claiming to have won something and embarassed all liberals of the world. lol dude. just answer the question you're asked.
squeegee double-posted this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,067
@764,054 (J)
... i asked a question you blithering retard, and then speculated about the answer. so yes, i made it up. are you confused over what the word speculate means?and since sheep didn't answer my question but instead get defensive i have no idea if he actually thinks that. just that he thinks i should be forced to quote him on an answer he refuses to give. i'm not a mind reader.
i can only speculate he refused to answer the question becuase he knows it'll make him look exactly how i described him: as a crazy conspiracy bigot. unless he's not, but we'll see if he ever answers about his feelings towards the jews and their control of the world.
... i asked a question you blithering retard, and then speculated about the answer. so yes, i made it up. are you confused over what the word speculate means?and since sheep didn't answer my question but instead get defensive i have no idea if he actually thinks that. just that he thinks i should be forced to quote him on an answer he refuses to give. i'm not a mind reader.
i can only speculate he refused to answer the question becuase he knows it'll make him look exactly how i described him: as a crazy conspiracy bigot. unless he's not, but we'll see if he ever answers about his feelings towards the jews and their control of the world.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,069
@previous (squeegee)
> ... i asked a question you blithering retard
Literally the first clause of the opening sentence.
I ask again - why can you modern American liberals never engage in a conversation without descending into a downward spiral of mewling insults and ad hominem attacks?
> ... i asked a question you blithering retard
Literally the first clause of the opening sentence.
I ask again - why can you modern American liberals never engage in a conversation without descending into a downward spiral of mewling insults and ad hominem attacks?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,071
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,073
@764,069 (J)
why do you beg for an insult free safe space? does it hurt your sensitive little feelings? grow up.
or just keep being a child and use every distraction you can to avoid answering tough questions. "we're being asked easy to answer and yet challenging questions, but instead of answering them look at how mean they asked, that's so rude, let's talk about how rude that is an not answer the hard questions at all. we'll just change the conversation becuase i'm just so shocked words."
get fucked you ridiculous simpleton. you don't get to cry out for a safe space.
why do you beg for an insult free safe space? does it hurt your sensitive little feelings? grow up.
or just keep being a child and use every distraction you can to avoid answering tough questions. "we're being asked easy to answer and yet challenging questions, but instead of answering them look at how mean they asked, that's so rude, let's talk about how rude that is an not answer the hard questions at all. we'll just change the conversation becuase i'm just so shocked words."
get fucked you ridiculous simpleton. you don't get to cry out for a safe space.
dreamworks !vJwW0tsPXQ replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,076
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,078
@764,073 (squeegee)
> get fucked you ridiculous simpleton
and...
> grow up
Ah liberals :) The gift that just keeps on givin'!
Nobody is "crying out for a safe space", I am simply asking why you are incapable of having a calm and mature conversation without resorting to apoplectic outbursts of ad hominem rage every time someone presents you with an idea you don't like. If you can't answer it, no problem.
> get fucked you ridiculous simpleton
and...
> grow up
Ah liberals :) The gift that just keeps on givin'!
Nobody is "crying out for a safe space", I am simply asking why you are incapable of having a calm and mature conversation without resorting to apoplectic outbursts of ad hominem rage every time someone presents you with an idea you don't like. If you can't answer it, no problem.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,084
@previous (J)
no you're just changing the conversation so tough questions can be ignored. just deflect something onto liberals and claim to be superior becuase of it. that's what you're crying out for, that kinda rhetorical safe space.
why don't you answer the jewish question? what's your solution?
no you're just changing the conversation so tough questions can be ignored. just deflect something onto liberals and claim to be superior becuase of it. that's what you're crying out for, that kinda rhetorical safe space.
why don't you answer the jewish question? what's your solution?
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,085
@previous (squeegee)
> the jewish question? what's your solution?
Nice fascist nod.
But anyway, what "Jewish question" are you talking about? You rage incoherently a lot. Summarize your question succinctly and I will answer it for you.
> the jewish question? what's your solution?
Nice fascist nod.
But anyway, what "Jewish question" are you talking about? You rage incoherently a lot. Summarize your question succinctly and I will answer it for you.
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,087
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,110
@764,085 (J)
the one i've already asked multiple times. do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers? do try and pay attention.
the one i've already asked multiple times. do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers? do try and pay attention.
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,113
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,114
@764,110 (squeegee)
> do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
Firstly, define "global Jews" please. How are "global Jews" different to "Jews", did the diaspora extend beyond Earth's confines?
> do the global jews need to be deposed from their power as world puppeteers?
Firstly, define "global Jews" please. How are "global Jews" different to "Jews", did the diaspora extend beyond Earth's confines?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,123
Anonymous S replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,133
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,134
@764,114 (J)
global jew. international jew. the belief that jews secretly control everything from banking to the media to further their own greedy ends at the expense of everyone else. internatinal jew. call it what you want you know exactly what is implied.
global jew. international jew. the belief that jews secretly control everything from banking to the media to further their own greedy ends at the expense of everyone else. internatinal jew. call it what you want you know exactly what is implied.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,135
@previous (squeegee)
> global jew. international jew.
So, a "Jew" then. Thanks for clearing that up.
> the belief that jews secretly control everything from banking to the media to further their own greedy ends at the expense of everyone else.
Demonstrably untrue.
> global jew. international jew.
So, a "Jew" then. Thanks for clearing that up.
> the belief that jews secretly control everything from banking to the media to further their own greedy ends at the expense of everyone else.
Demonstrably untrue.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,136
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,137
@previous (squeegee)
Fine, try to do so without resorting to insults and name-calling. Attack the idea, not the person.
Fine, try to do so without resorting to insults and name-calling. Attack the idea, not the person.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,138
@previous (J)
fuck off you ignorant cunt, finally after explaining it to you like a 5 year old you finally got it. i wonder how much i have to dumb it down to get sheep to finally give an answer.
fuck off you ignorant cunt, finally after explaining it to you like a 5 year old you finally got it. i wonder how much i have to dumb it down to get sheep to finally give an answer.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,139
@previous (squeegee)
> fuck off you ignorant cunt
Why are you modern liberals so highly-strung? Is almost as if being raised in an environment which taught you that you were precious snowflakes didn't equip you to handle opposing opinions like intelligent adults.
> fuck off you ignorant cunt
Why are you modern liberals so highly-strung? Is almost as if being raised in an environment which taught you that you were precious snowflakes didn't equip you to handle opposing opinions like intelligent adults.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,140
@previous (J)
becuase modern conservatives are ignorant cunts who only seem to understand a question when they're pinned down to a simple yes or no statement.
becuase modern conservatives are ignorant cunts who only seem to understand a question when they're pinned down to a simple yes or no statement.
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,141
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,142
I didn't know I could troll this good ?
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,143
@764,140 (squeegee)
> ignorant cunts
You're doing it again. Why were you never taught how to properly handle opposing viewpoints?
> ignorant cunts
You're doing it again. Why were you never taught how to properly handle opposing viewpoints?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,144
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,149
@764,065 (squeegee)
Lol, squeegee in full rage mode, this is rather pleasant. I'll answer your question by not answering it tho. And sorry for not addressing your question earlier, you type out so much bullshit, I just cba to respond to all of it, but now that's it's one direct question, I'll do you the favour.
First of all, point out where I said that the jews are the real puppet masters. So your question fails already at that. But I'll still go ahead and share some of my beliefs and ideas.
First of all, I salute Hungary for telling Rothschild owned banks to leave the country. I wouldn't go as far as calling them puppet masters, but cancer of society who are masters of "jew tactics" (hostile takeovers then leech off where they arrived) and I support everyone who fights them.
I also think media in general (and I mention media, because the jews control a good portion of it) should suffer faaar bigger consequences for spreading [trigger warning] FAKE NEWS. They have been caught lying and manipulating far too many times without giving any apologies or correcting statements.
One puppeteer I'd love see hanged on a public square is George Soros. And it just turns out, he's a jew as well.
Watch this and tell me this is normal:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZhIrYxOQsI
There are a few other folks I'd like to see in hell one day when I arrive there, and believe it or not, most of them ain't jews. So the answer to your retarded wrongly asked question is no.
Lol, squeegee in full rage mode, this is rather pleasant. I'll answer your question by not answering it tho. And sorry for not addressing your question earlier, you type out so much bullshit, I just cba to respond to all of it, but now that's it's one direct question, I'll do you the favour.
First of all, point out where I said that the jews are the real puppet masters. So your question fails already at that. But I'll still go ahead and share some of my beliefs and ideas.
First of all, I salute Hungary for telling Rothschild owned banks to leave the country. I wouldn't go as far as calling them puppet masters, but cancer of society who are masters of "jew tactics" (hostile takeovers then leech off where they arrived) and I support everyone who fights them.
I also think media in general (and I mention media, because the jews control a good portion of it) should suffer faaar bigger consequences for spreading [trigger warning] FAKE NEWS. They have been caught lying and manipulating far too many times without giving any apologies or correcting statements.
One puppeteer I'd love see hanged on a public square is George Soros. And it just turns out, he's a jew as well.
Watch this and tell me this is normal:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZhIrYxOQsI
There are a few other folks I'd like to see in hell one day when I arrive there, and believe it or not, most of them ain't jews. So the answer to your retarded wrongly asked question is no.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,150
@764,143 (J)
you understand that you're being insulting too, right you moron? you're just not using disparaging language. but implying i've never been taught how to handle opposing view points, am unequipped to handle debates, and need to be treated as a special snowflake are all equally insulting comments. you're just not using "hurtful words," but are still being an insulting cunt.
we choose to insult each other differently, you gaping shit hole, but we're still both insulting each other. you're just an incredible dimwit and can't tell the difference between expressing opinion and deriding opposing viewpoints. so i'll do the same to you you oblivious mendicant.
all you can really do is attack my language since you're obviously incapable of addressing the content of what i say. "i can't answer your question without revealingmy bias, so i'm going to pretend to be offended with how you ask and ignore it instead."
real mature, guy. cause that's how adults argue opinions? lol.
you understand that you're being insulting too, right you moron? you're just not using disparaging language. but implying i've never been taught how to handle opposing view points, am unequipped to handle debates, and need to be treated as a special snowflake are all equally insulting comments. you're just not using "hurtful words," but are still being an insulting cunt.
we choose to insult each other differently, you gaping shit hole, but we're still both insulting each other. you're just an incredible dimwit and can't tell the difference between expressing opinion and deriding opposing viewpoints. so i'll do the same to you you oblivious mendicant.
all you can really do is attack my language since you're obviously incapable of addressing the content of what i say. "i can't answer your question without revealingmy bias, so i'm going to pretend to be offended with how you ask and ignore it instead."
real mature, guy. cause that's how adults argue opinions? lol.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,152
@previous (squeegee)
> you moron.....cunt.....you gaping shit hole.....you're just an incredible dimwit.....you oblivious mendicant.
All in one raging block of shrill and squalling incoherence.
This is what happens when you raise a generation to be inarticulate, uninformed, and self-entitled. They don't learn the skills of proper adult-level debate and instead resort to wailing like spoilt children.
> you moron.....cunt.....you gaping shit hole.....you're just an incredible dimwit.....you oblivious mendicant.
All in one raging block of shrill and squalling incoherence.
This is what happens when you raise a generation to be inarticulate, uninformed, and self-entitled. They don't learn the skills of proper adult-level debate and instead resort to wailing like spoilt children.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,153
@764,149 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
there it is. the good stuff. so you've been brainwashed into believing the jews are a cancer on society who use jew tactics to lie and manipulate on a global level.
no wonder you love diminishing the lives lost during the holocaust, "it wasn't as bad as they say" really opens the door to continued persecution doesn't it... sheep.
there it is. the good stuff. so you've been brainwashed into believing the jews are a cancer on society who use jew tactics to lie and manipulate on a global level.
no wonder you love diminishing the lives lost during the holocaust, "it wasn't as bad as they say" really opens the door to continued persecution doesn't it... sheep.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,154
@764,150 (squeegee)
Eh squeegee, I've been called an idiot, retard, mora, dimwit... by you and fake anon countless times, and up until this thread I never responded to you two like that.
And when I did yesterday, fake anon was all like "baaaw, calm down, take a chill pill, muuuh feelings are hurt".
You both are pathetic snowflakes that have been in your safe space, without facing the real world, for far too long.
Eh squeegee, I've been called an idiot, retard, mora, dimwit... by you and fake anon countless times, and up until this thread I never responded to you two like that.
And when I did yesterday, fake anon was all like "baaaw, calm down, take a chill pill, muuuh feelings are hurt".
You both are pathetic snowflakes that have been in your safe space, without facing the real world, for far too long.
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,155
squeegee double-posted this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,156
@764,154 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
and now i'm calling you brainwashed by russian propaganda and jew hate. typical bigot. it's funny you think "the real world" revolves around your silly little conspiracy theories though.
and now i'm calling you brainwashed by russian propaganda and jew hate. typical bigot. it's funny you think "the real world" revolves around your silly little conspiracy theories though.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,157
@764,153 (squeegee)
> there it is. the good stuff. so you've been brainwashed into believing the jews are a cancer on society who use jew tactics to lie and manipulate on a global level.
>
> no wonder you love diminishing the lives lost during the holocaust, "it wasn't as bad as they say" really opens the door to continued persecution doesn't it... sheep.
Absolutely nothing you've just written is anything like what he wrote. You look like a flailing infant when you mischaracterize people's positions like this to hide the fact that you can't engage in a proper adult conversation.
> there it is. the good stuff. so you've been brainwashed into believing the jews are a cancer on society who use jew tactics to lie and manipulate on a global level.
>
> no wonder you love diminishing the lives lost during the holocaust, "it wasn't as bad as they say" really opens the door to continued persecution doesn't it... sheep.
Absolutely nothing you've just written is anything like what he wrote. You look like a flailing infant when you mischaracterize people's positions like this to hide the fact that you can't engage in a proper adult conversation.
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,158
God squeegee you really fucked this up
squeegee replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,159
@764,157 (J)
what? he called jews a cancer on society and described how they weild world influence and need to be deposed... by being hung publicly... this is exactly how i characterized him... are you even literate? did you even read what he wrote?
at this point it's pretty obvious you're being obtuse to try and deflect from the fact that i characterized him perfectly.
what? he called jews a cancer on society and described how they weild world influence and need to be deposed... by being hung publicly... this is exactly how i characterized him... are you even literate? did you even read what he wrote?
at this point it's pretty obvious you're being obtuse to try and deflect from the fact that i characterized him perfectly.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,160
@764,153 (squeegee)
Ignoring pretty much everything I said in the post, being a lousy spin doctor again. I said that the rothschild family is cancer, the fact that they are jews is a freaky coincidence. Same as Mr. Soros.
You again take pieces out of context, spin them to fit your agenda and spread disinfo. You're a funny guy. I'd love to put you in a glass box and study.
Ignoring pretty much everything I said in the post, being a lousy spin doctor again. I said that the rothschild family is cancer, the fact that they are jews is a freaky coincidence. Same as Mr. Soros.
You again take pieces out of context, spin them to fit your agenda and spread disinfo. You're a funny guy. I'd love to put you in a glass box and study.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,161
@764,159 (squeegee)
Double post, I'll quote myself:
> First of all, point out where I said that the jews are the real puppet masters.
Double post, I'll quote myself:
> First of all, point out where I said that the jews are the real puppet masters.
Anonymous J replied with this 9 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,162
@764,159 (squeegee)
> what? he called jews a cancer on society and described how they weild world influence and need to be deposed...
No he didn't.
> are you even literate?
It's unwise to ask this question when you write 'words' like "weild".
> did you even read what he wrote?
Yes, which is why I'm telling you that you apparently don't understand a single word of what he's writing.
> what? he called jews a cancer on society and described how they weild world influence and need to be deposed...
No he didn't.
> are you even literate?
It's unwise to ask this question when you write 'words' like "weild".
> did you even read what he wrote?
Yes, which is why I'm telling you that you apparently don't understand a single word of what he's writing.
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,167
jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews jews
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,612
@764,149 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
"soros"
OK now you sound like you just another sheep yourself, rank-and-file party member with talking points, unserious and unstudied
"soros"
OK now you sound like you just another sheep yourself, rank-and-file party member with talking points, unserious and unstudied
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,617
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
> "soros"
> OK now you sound like you just another sheep yourself, rank-and-file party member with talking points, unserious and unstudied
sheep has always been a sheep
he just doesn't know it
which is really funny to me
> "soros"
> OK now you sound like you just another sheep yourself, rank-and-file party member with talking points, unserious and unstudied
sheep has always been a sheep
he just doesn't know it
which is really funny to me
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,628
@764,612 (Sheila LaBoof)
Soros admits to spread chaos, topple governments and run lives for personal gain and giggles.
> lol sheep you're such a sheep
Pewdiepie pulls off silly jokes to show how broken society is.
> he is such a racist, the media told me, we saw him making people hold signs that say "death to all jews"
Sure thing buddy. I can live with my sheepleness, hope you can live with yours too! ;)
Soros admits to spread chaos, topple governments and run lives for personal gain and giggles.
> lol sheep you're such a sheep
Pewdiepie pulls off silly jokes to show how broken society is.
> he is such a racist, the media told me, we saw him making people hold signs that say "death to all jews"
Sure thing buddy. I can live with my sheepleness, hope you can live with yours too! ;)
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,629
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
> Soros admits to spread chaos, topple governments and run lives for personal gain and giggles.
> >lol sheep you're such a sheep
>
> Pewdiepie pulls off silly jokes to show how broken society is.
> >he is such a racist, the media told me, we saw him making people hold signs that say "death to all jews"
>
> Sure thing buddy. I can live with my sheepleness, hope you can live with yours too! ;)
no, that's not correct information there
> Soros admits to spread chaos, topple governments and run lives for personal gain and giggles.
> >lol sheep you're such a sheep
>
> Pewdiepie pulls off silly jokes to show how broken society is.
> >he is such a racist, the media told me, we saw him making people hold signs that say "death to all jews"
>
> Sure thing buddy. I can live with my sheepleness, hope you can live with yours too! ;)
no, that's not correct information there
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,632
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,633
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #764,634
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
You too... I'll even help you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZhIrYxOQsI
Mr. Soros isn't even hiding it, and look who he brings as company. Mr. Billy and Madam President herself. Top LOL :^)
You too... I'll even help you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZhIrYxOQsI
Mr. Soros isn't even hiding it, and look who he brings as company. Mr. Billy and Madam President herself. Top LOL :^)
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,664
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,689
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,690
Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,693
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Do you think the only valid form of information comes from the reference section of your local library?
Do you think the only valid form of information comes from the reference section of your local library?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,695
@previous (L)
tell me what's in the video smart guy. not what supposed to have been claimed, naturally.
tell me what's in the video smart guy. not what supposed to have been claimed, naturally.
Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,700
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,703
Anonymous L replied with this 9 years ago, 54 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,714
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,725
@previous (L)
he showed me a video and his evidence was inaudible whispering on a CNN set. he then accused me of mental gymnastics for not seeing it his way and stopped talking to me
he showed me a video and his evidence was inaudible whispering on a CNN set. he then accused me of mental gymnastics for not seeing it his way and stopped talking to me
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,736
@previous (hot toddy)
> he showed me a video and his evidence was inaudible whispering on a CNN set. he then accused me of mental gymnastics for not seeing it his way and stopped talking to me
Lay off the drugs, m80.
> he showed me a video and his evidence was inaudible whispering on a CNN set. he then accused me of mental gymnastics for not seeing it his way and stopped talking to me
Lay off the drugs, m80.
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,737
It just sounds like he was being flippant. Idk.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,750
@764,664 (Sheila LaBoof)
You are correct sir. After a careful rereading of the facts and some deep reflection, I have rethought my position. I am above making political slurs, and I hold the Jewish people in the highest regard.
You are correct sir. After a careful rereading of the facts and some deep reflection, I have rethought my position. I am above making political slurs, and I hold the Jewish people in the highest regard.
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,774
@764,736 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
> > he showed me a video and his evidence was inaudible whispering on a CNN set. he then accused me of mental gymnastics for not seeing it his way and stopped talking to me
>
> Lay off the drugs, m80.
and then he accused me of being a drug addict
> > he showed me a video and his evidence was inaudible whispering on a CNN set. he then accused me of mental gymnastics for not seeing it his way and stopped talking to me
>
> Lay off the drugs, m80.
and then he accused me of being a drug addict
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,775
@764,750 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
Hahaha, how mad do you have to be to go and crack my tripcode. When I thought some people couldn't go any lower, lol...
Hahaha, how mad do you have to be to go and crack my tripcode. When I thought some people couldn't go any lower, lol...
DasSheeple !XPQqN0U9Ew double-posted this 9 years ago, 55 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,776
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,823
so why post vidoes that don't describe the claim?
baffling
baffling
Anonymous G replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,824
@764,775 (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
Nah, I just wanted to see if you'd get perturbed about seeming less crazy.
Nah, I just wanted to see if you'd get perturbed about seeming less crazy.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #764,829
so I'm reminded of the joke, how did they separate the men from the boys in ancient Greece?
with a crowbar
because they were fuckin
with a crowbar
because they were fuckin
(Edited 26 seconds later.)