Topic: A Trump supporter defends Kellyanne Conway's ethics breach
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 years ago #60,019 > I’m sure that Conway was not thinking about her new position or ethics violations when she made a rather flippant remark to buy more “Ivanka stuff.” After all, women are generally known for talking about clothes and making recommendations of brands and stores?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/16/trump-administration-think-law-tellusatoday/98007898/ Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 13 minutes later[^] [v] #762,223 The soft bigotry of low expectations.
Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #762,224 But you can't even buy "Ivanka stuff" anymore so I don't see what the big deal is.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 3 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #762,226 @previous (Meta )
We got to dog pile all things Trump. Didn't you get the memo from CTR?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 years ago , 50 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #762,237 @762,224 (Meta )
Uh, yeah, you can still buy her stuff.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago , 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #762,238 @762,224 (Meta )
http://ivankatrump.com/collection/
And all her clothing lines that are sold in various stores like Macy's or Walmart. What are you talking about?
hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago , 50 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,250 females. they... talk about... clothes? right??
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago , 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,252 @762,238 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
She actually makes nice stuff
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago , 31 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,270 @previous (D)
She probably doesn't need the White House violating ethics rules to hawk her wares then.
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago , 26 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,283 @762,252 (D)
some of those tops were OK but all the shoes were awful
↕