Topic: Given that we cannot prove that earth is NOT the center of the universe...
Meta started this discussion 9 years ago #59,998
The geocentric theory might actually be true.Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #762,033
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #762,035
@OP
Spoiler: It isn't.
Spoiler: It isn't.
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #762,043
The universe is infinite so technically earth can be centre of the universe.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #762,047
stop trying to act smart. you're a moron
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #762,050
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #762,052
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,198
This is another one of those Meta troll topics right?
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,206
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I mean it could be true in the sense that it can't be proved that Earth IS NOT the center of the universe.
I mean it could be true in the sense that it can't be proved that Earth IS NOT the center of the universe.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,207
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,209
@762,206 (Meta)
Why would you have to prove that??? Everything in the universe is constantly moving with respect to everything else. Our galaxy and the Andromeda galaxy are going to collide in a couple billion years. How the hell is the earth supposed to constantly be in the "center" of the universe? Are you on drugs?
Why would you have to prove that??? Everything in the universe is constantly moving with respect to everything else. Our galaxy and the Andromeda galaxy are going to collide in a couple billion years. How the hell is the earth supposed to constantly be in the "center" of the universe? Are you on drugs?
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 58 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,213
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
But it's all moving relative to the Earth. Who's the say the Earth isn't stationary and everything else is moving?
But it's all moving relative to the Earth. Who's the say the Earth isn't stationary and everything else is moving?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,214
I think the Earth is in the middle and dark matter created by the Jews shifts everything around.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,215
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,216
@762,214 (H)
This is honestly closer to the truth than @762,213 (Meta) and it's completely fucking retarded. I just thought you should know.
This is honestly closer to the truth than @762,213 (Meta) and it's completely fucking retarded. I just thought you should know.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,217
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,219
Anonymous I replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,220
@previous (Meta)
Stop being retarded.
http://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/searching-for-answers/vaccines-autism
http://www.poison.org/articles/2010-oct/vaccines-do-not-cause-autism
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/07/130716-autism-vaccines-mccarthy-view-medicine-science/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/08/vaccines-do-not-cause-autism-speaks_n_6632000.html
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/new-meta-analysis-confirms-no-association-between-vaccines-and-autism
Stop being retarded.
http://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/searching-for-answers/vaccines-autism
http://www.poison.org/articles/2010-oct/vaccines-do-not-cause-autism
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/07/130716-autism-vaccines-mccarthy-view-medicine-science/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/08/vaccines-do-not-cause-autism-speaks_n_6632000.html
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/new-meta-analysis-confirms-no-association-between-vaccines-and-autism
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,240
hot toddy joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 47 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,249
can anybody tell when meta is being serious
I'm just gonna keep assuming he's retarded
I'm just gonna keep assuming he's retarded
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,294
@previous (hot toddy)
> Difficulty understanding their listener's perspective. For example, a child with autism may not understand that someone is using humor. They may interpret the communication word for word and fail to catch the implied meaning.
> Difficulty understanding their listener's perspective. For example, a child with autism may not understand that someone is using humor. They may interpret the communication word for word and fail to catch the implied meaning.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,298
@762,213 (Meta)
> But it's all moving relative to the Earth. Who's the say the Earth isn't stationary and everything else is moving?
Couldn't you make that argument about any point in the universe? You can't prove that Becky is NOT the center of the universe, so why not argue just as convincingly for a Beckycentric theory of cosmology?
> But it's all moving relative to the Earth. Who's the say the Earth isn't stationary and everything else is moving?
Couldn't you make that argument about any point in the universe? You can't prove that Becky is NOT the center of the universe, so why not argue just as convincingly for a Beckycentric theory of cosmology?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,319
Sure is mad in here.
Meta (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #762,327
hot toddy replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #762,425
hot toddy double-posted this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #762,431
@762,298 (B)
> > But it's all moving relative to the Earth. Who's the say the Earth isn't stationary and everything else is moving?
>
> Couldn't you make that argument about any point in the universe?
yeah. and people do when talking about the expanding universe but I guess meta has difficulty understanding different perspectives
> > But it's all moving relative to the Earth. Who's the say the Earth isn't stationary and everything else is moving?
>
> Couldn't you make that argument about any point in the universe?
yeah. and people do when talking about the expanding universe but I guess meta has difficulty understanding different perspectives
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #762,557
@762,327 (Meta)
She would. Reconciling the various orbiting cats with Kepler's laws is going to result in a paradigm shift in modern astrophysics.
She would. Reconciling the various orbiting cats with Kepler's laws is going to result in a paradigm shift in modern astrophysics.