Check out "Latest bulletins" "Massage" on TC and click on the link re Spam and see where it takes you too. (Massage is sperled correctly!)
lolol
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
!34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,451
It's 'which', not 'what' spammers. >_>
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,462
@previous (!34Kas0OdzM)
English lessons 101
If so I B in deep doo doo
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,477
@previous (Syntax) > Syntax reccomending English lessons.
Oh the irony. I also like how he constantly uses the "101" argument to insult the intelligence of others.
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,480
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Dat level of discourse
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,871
@103,477 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Not once never, have I used my intelligence to insult anyone's English. I have on rare occasions, reminded those with BA/MA/PhD/ degrees, of spelling errors. I may not be a good speller, but I most certainly know how to use a browser that spell checks for me. The Chrome spell checker sucks by comparison to Firefox's. One even rarer occasions I notice those with advanced liberal art degrees, fucking over English. That pleases me!
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,874
@previous (Syntax)
I don't use my intelligence to insult people's English. I'll make fun of your English because you're ridiculous. Also, you're changing the subject. I would say something completely logical and rather than argue with the logic you would just say something like "You need to take a logic 101 course." Good argument, dumbass. And then in this thread, rather than point out the actual error, or better yet just keep your mouth shut since you have no room to talk about grammatical errors, you made the comment about taking an English 101 course.
DREAMWORKS joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,884
@103,871 (Syntax) > using numbers instead of letters > implying dyslexia
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,886
Syntax double-posted this 15 years ago, 38 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,914
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Yea but if we do get back to The Spammer Broseph will have a sissy hissy fit.
See my reply to r04r re TC's message re Spammer. Clicking the link does make one laff, and its a legit spam report form. I know because I got email feedback from them lol
Syntax triple-posted this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,923
Somebody is Go Daddy and they have an open field that allows a message along with details on spam/etc/
I filled in "Information Found to be Invalid*" and included my e-addy
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,928
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Satellites, FBI, pedophiles, and aliens probably.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,937
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
lol dont be mad, broseph
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#103,939
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#104,332
@previous (Yes !4et0YaTXO.)
Why on earth would anyone WANT 2 Lie about such?
Give me one good or even bad reason lolol
Yes !4et0YaTXO. (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#104,348
@previous (Syntax)
C'mon DEF, you think I don't know who you are?
I know about that post about eye candy. I HAVE PROOF. You don't!
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#104,373
@previous (Yes !4et0YaTXO.)
Of course You know, and as to eye candy, a term I have used often, it often applies to women like Jennifer Aniston, Nicole Kidman, Julia Roberts, Cameron Diaz, and a neighbor of property I recently bought in North East County, Sandra Bullock, and because she grows Avocados of variety's unique and more better then standard Hass variety, I plan on asking her for a tree or three so as 2b a Gentlemen farmer type soon enough. Prelude to owning a vineyard for my new Wine making venture!!!! Brandy's as well, cept maybe not in USA re permits are a nitemare to obtain for Stills.
Yes eye candy as an Artistic term, and NOT a term you wish it to be re your need for CP
Yes !4et0YaTXO. (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 days later, 6 days after the original post[^][v]#108,055
@previous (Syntax)
Autistic, you mean, if it applies to you!
xXx squ4r3d xXx !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^][v]#108,059