Topic: You know who I am and where I've been
S started this discussion 9 years ago #59,453
Freedom is good.
Lorraine, on the other hand, is a sociopath who revels in the false commiseration (which it is actually incapable of feeling) with others' fear and alarm by unnecessarily raising attention to things needless-to-know by certain unnamed parties.
I hope introman enjoys his life long companionship with this degenerate reprobate.
Lorraine, on the other hand, is a sociopath who revels in the false commiseration (which it is actually incapable of feeling) with others' fear and alarm by unnecessarily raising attention to things needless-to-know by certain unnamed parties.
I hope introman enjoys his life long companionship with this degenerate reprobate.
Big Daddy Derek joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #756,488
@OP
Welcome back to the fora, Mr. Gillon.
Welcome back to the fora, Mr. Gillon.
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,489
@previous (Big Daddy Derek)
Is whiteknighting some West Coast Pictoid pseudotranny AGP who stole his persona from daytime television in an overcompensatory bid to make up for latent homosexuality par for the course with introman's adherents now?
Is whiteknighting some West Coast Pictoid pseudotranny AGP who stole his persona from daytime television in an overcompensatory bid to make up for latent homosexuality par for the course with introman's adherents now?
? joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 0 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,490
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo double-posted this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,491
BPD?
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo triple-posted this 9 years ago, 15 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,492
BPD.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,493
@756,489 (S)
I merely wanted to welcome you back to the fora on behalf of the Big Daddies Derek, Mr. Gillon. I have no idea whom these "Introman" and "Lorraine" characters are.
I merely wanted to welcome you back to the fora on behalf of the Big Daddies Derek, Mr. Gillon. I have no idea whom these "Introman" and "Lorraine" characters are.
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 57 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,494
@756,491 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Quasipsychiatric dross designed to delegitimise the identities of already marginalised groups. Cheers.
Quasipsychiatric dross designed to delegitimise the identities of already marginalised groups. Cheers.
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,495
@previous (S)
This is word salad, Mr. Gillon. I see that your time at Her Majesty's pleasure was clearly wasted.
This is word salad, Mr. Gillon. I see that your time at Her Majesty's pleasure was clearly wasted.
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,496
@previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Prison is inherently unrehabilitative by manner of its punitive emphasis. But then, you are a screw of the system with unspoken awareness of this.
Prison is inherently unrehabilitative by manner of its punitive emphasis. But then, you are a screw of the system with unspoken awareness of this.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,497
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,498
@756,496 (S)
Whilst incarcerated, Mr. Gillon, you were likely offered ample opportunities for your own betterment. Why, praytell, did you fail to take advantage of them?
Whilst incarcerated, Mr. Gillon, you were likely offered ample opportunities for your own betterment. Why, praytell, did you fail to take advantage of them?
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,499
This thread is becoming Hasselhoffian and is the more egregious that you are unanswerable to or unaccountable for this, since it is probably now to be entertained by me, I would be recognized by such inferiority of prole pablum that now comprises the negrotypical not to constantly overguess or decode such a rejection, you find yourself at lacking avail owing to a Negroid (this is not the same implication as those protected statuses harboured by the Wicca-esque confines of Feminist sororital dormatories.Aspergian, who thus far, in wake of all these iniquities, find themselves, by manner of deliberation of collusion within the societal monolith, so society has used its trappings, already described and elucidated in detail, to further ensnare us. If you dare try to circumvent their calumny of the innocious Hasselhoffian perspicacity, in emancipation of the last refined literatures we see in the first instance, though. If a Peaktu mountain spirit is what defines DPRK's national character than by all of them shall we endeavour to achieve, whether by dint of graft, or skin of teeth.
Mugabe’s former colleague, Joshua Nkomo, said dismissively to Western journalists at a post-conference dinner: "It really all depends on your principles.” A sacrificial offering of this term by a different spin on the ward itself, in July ‘14. No, yours is a game we shall misimplicate pre-existing diagnostic talismen as the ones of your predecessors.
Despite the fact that my statement's incontrovertibility on its own proves my superior fluid intellect. by over-emphasizing the negative and predated against you, rendering you ceaselessly dehumanized and disassociated from the Goyim (Gentile/non-Jew), even those mis-educated doctors who practice it, merely implementing toyish doppelgangers of the speaker. In times of old, it would only be described by the Biblical proverb of “speaking from both sides of the hegemonic ladder of LGBT communitarian ascension e.g. peanut gallery sodomites like Decibelmilliwatts, general sodomites and solicitors of prostitutional wiles like Bert, then you will most likely be confined to rehabilitative drudgery to death as an immutable sentence. If you dare try to circumvent the more egregious thereof, you are most certainly not recruiting.
Aspergian determination is now seen only by the neurodiversity agenda, who’ve inculcated into me these insights into a disenfranchisement of mistrust to the most disgusting sort, destroy legal identities in a process of revolutionary mettel in the imperative instruction of persecution against me, and actually less if we're to believe certain mythologies of neurotypical neurology. Matriarchy's magical powers shall expand exponentially. Transceiver grills, shopkeep agents, and faux-"support" surveillance workers aren't their limit any longer. No. Sexologically distressing broadcasting in boasting of what I was responding to; to be 3 different psychiatrists and make contradictory observations on this autist, one of the institutionally sanctioned elite batallion of matriarchally elevated, buoyed and enfranchised. These legal codifications are merely extensions of their digit ratio (which will be intrinsic to the heathenistic, and are using them against me in kind.
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,501
You far overestimate the putative "opportunities" on offer on account of assuming the short length of my sentence was close to sufficient in accommodating for those.
Besides, accredition is a talisman for facts are negroidal. That's. Autphagian philosophy 101.@756,498 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Besides, accredition is a talisman for facts are negroidal. That's. Autphagian philosophy 101.@756,498 (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo replied with this 9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #756,502
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,504
You're right, insofar as that is a testament to academia's inherent constructive weakness. @previous (Big Daddy Derek !Uvm54ORbmo)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,505
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,506
How are you, Sophie?
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,508
And you are?
A faceless, inconsequential anon. Oh, and you expected me *not* to disregard your opinion? @756,505 (F)
A faceless, inconsequential anon. Oh, and you expected me *not* to disregard your opinion? @756,505 (F)
S (OP) double-posted this 9 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,509
Ilu@756,506 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,511
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,512
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I fucked up good and proper. Given that I'm basically the White equivalent to a negroid, it was bound to happen. I still love you.
I fucked up good and proper. Given that I'm basically the White equivalent to a negroid, it was bound to happen. I still love you.
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,513
@756,508 (S)
I seem to have struck a nerve! If I was so "inconsequential", my gag about you dropping the soap would have been easy to ignore. Why does the topic of being prison butt buddies trigger you so much?
I seem to have struck a nerve! If I was so "inconsequential", my gag about you dropping the soap would have been easy to ignore. Why does the topic of being prison butt buddies trigger you so much?
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,515
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,516
I did effectively ignore it. You seem to have trouble differentiating a response from vocalised dismissal.@756,513 (F)
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,517
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,518
TGComix was right about everything he ever said about you.@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,519
@previous (S)I see you're employing the "siding with another fake tranny" strategy there, Christopher.
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,520
I can agree with positions of his without necessarily aligning with his objectively objectable person.@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,522
@previous (S)As a doctor, I think it looks more like you're making a ham-fisted attempt at trollshielding.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,524
@756,516 (S)
> I did effectively ignore it. You seem to have trouble differentiating a response from vocalised dismissal.@756,513 (F)
Yet another reply from the man who really doesn't care, pinkie promise! Your fooling nobody, Mr Hands
> I did effectively ignore it. You seem to have trouble differentiating a response from vocalised dismissal.@756,513 (F)
Yet another reply from the man who really doesn't care, pinkie promise! Your fooling nobody, Mr Hands
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,525
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #756,528
If you can even call them that...@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,529
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,532
Were you there, Markus?
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,533
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,536
Markus, oh Advocat of the Empiricist Order, does not the merit of your argumentative dark art stand on the principle "What you see os what you get" (known otherwise in Autphagism as the "negroidal factoid")? Then, preytell, why lead us astray with your credentials talisman?@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,541
@previous (S)I've seen Markov chains make more sense than this, Christopher. Try to express yourself more clearly.
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,543
It sounded clear enough in my head. The mode of expression I've taken stays. @previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,551
@previous (S)What use is this made-up philosophy, Christopher, if you are the only person capable of understanding it? Why can't you understand that it's all just insane babble?
S (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,553
I understand completely that it's mostly indecipherable from a conventional perspective which is wholly a reflection of the decipherers' ill-equippedness in question @previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,554
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY replied with this 9 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,556
ken griffey sr joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 6 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,627
lol I bet u had to bathe regularly in the slammer that's nice
Anonymous F replied with this 9 years ago, 4 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,647
@previous (ken griffey sr)
Where else would he find an excuse to get soaped up with a gang of muscle men?
Where else would he find an excuse to get soaped up with a gang of muscle men?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,648
What's the history here? Why is Doc obsessed with yet another poster on the chans?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,649
I'm slightly turned on by the idea of your boipucci getting a pounding in prison.
S joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 18 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #756,651
@756,627 (ken griffey sr)
@756,647 (F)
@756,648 (J)
@previous (K)
Why does it fail to surprise me that minichan yet again shows its collective mind to be in the gutter?
@756,647 (F)
@756,648 (J)
@previous (K)
Why does it fail to surprise me that minichan yet again shows its collective mind to be in the gutter?