Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 16 minutes later[^][v]#755,488
I'm pretty sure he can't.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#755,492
fuck him
somalians are the fucking worst the ugly looking
they are like mosquitos spreading themselves across the globe
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#755,494
Neither can citizens of our allies who happened to be born in these countries. If a British military contractor gave birth in Iraq in 2005 her child could not come to the US. The order is fucking retarded and overbroad.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#755,496
? joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#755,522
@OP
Most of the instances being reported today are like the one you cited, unsubstantiated conjecture. A Canadian citizen born in Somalia isn't going to be detained or deported. Anyone suggesting that they might be is a fucking idiot.
beckyderp !yDoooooooo joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,570
@previous (?)
Thank you for your well-founded insight.
? replied with this 9 years ago, 21 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,574
@previous (beckyderp !yDoooooooo)
Actually I was wrong and they're detaining people with dual nationality. I still maintain it was leftist fearmongering a few hours ago though.
Meta joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,577
@755,494 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Wouldn't her child have British citizenship automatically? There's more to citizenship than where you were born, iirc.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,578
@previous (Meta)
my parents have british citizenship and i had to apply to get it, wasn't given it at birth
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,647
@755,577 (Meta)
The order doesn't give a shit. If the child has Iraqi and British Citizenship, it can't come here, because the child is an Iraqi citizen. Dual nationalities, green cards, etc. have no relevance.
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,651
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
How many female British security contractors had babies in Iraq, anyway?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,654
@previous (Meta)
It was just one example of one of the scenarios wherein a person who is harmless gets banned from the U.S. because the order is written by people who are terrified of brown people. This ban is one of the stupider policies enacted in recent memory and yet this is only the very beginning of what is going to be a long fucking stupid presidency.
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Meta replied with this 9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,659
The British security contractor's babby would be allowed in the US anyway.
It has now emerged that Mr Johnson has been told by some of Mr Trump's closest advisers that the ban will only apply to those flying to the US directly from the seven nations.
Mr Johnson spoke directly to Steve Bannon, the White House chief strategist, and Jared Kushner, Mr Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, in a bid to secure protections for British citizens.
The approach will exempt the majority of the hundreds of thousands of Britons with dual nationality from one of the seven countries from being hit by the ban.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,662
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 9 years ago, 18 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#755,663
@755,659 (Meta)
Yeah now they're walking it back. In the original text there is nothing stating that. First they embarrass the U.S. with a hamhanded policy and then the meekly rescind parts of it. What a disgrace.