Topic: How to Successfully Clone Fatfuck
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #57,891
Not as difficult as it may sound. Let's look at the similarities between Matt and Wildchild:• Desperate need for negative attention.
• Transgendered personas (cf: Matt/Sophie).
• Extreme over-reaction to Syntax.
• Everything has to be about them.
• Incessant playing of the victim card.
• Steadfast refusal to take responsibility.
• Hysterical response to petty insults and imagined slights.
If you are able to fulfill all of these requirements, I can practically guarantee that you will be a successful Fatfuck clone.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #742,652
Okay, this is actually quite funny.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,653
@previous (B)
Ironically, you don't even need to emulate his signature shticks. In fact, doing so would alert the entire board that you are not, in fact*, Matt at all.
*Shtick™ fully intended.
Ironically, you don't even need to emulate his signature shticks. In fact, doing so would alert the entire board that you are not, in fact*, Matt at all.
*Shtick™ fully intended.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,654
> mattchan
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,655
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,657
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
Right, like when you once used the "hi, I'm (random name) and I just found this forum!" schtick.
@742,654 (C)
I think, as long as there is a Minichan, Matt's notoriety will remain. He's just made such an impression on our small community.
Right, like when you once used the "hi, I'm (random name) and I just found this forum!" schtick.
@742,654 (C)
I think, as long as there is a Minichan, Matt's notoriety will remain. He's just made such an impression on our small community.
WSD !NvEXY0NyQI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,658
@OP
> Not as difficult as it may sound. Let's look at the similarities between Matt and Wildchild:
>
> • Desperate need for negative attention.
> • Transgendered personas (cf: Matt/Sophie).
> • Extreme over-reaction to Syntax.
> • Everything has to be about them.
> • Incessant playing of the victim card.
> • Steadfast refusal to take responsibility.
> • Hysterical response to petty insults and imagined slights.
>
> If you are able to fulfill all of these requirements, I can practically guarantee that you will be a successful Fatfuck clone.
Lol.
> Not as difficult as it may sound. Let's look at the similarities between Matt and Wildchild:
>
> • Desperate need for negative attention.
> • Transgendered personas (cf: Matt/Sophie).
> • Extreme over-reaction to Syntax.
> • Everything has to be about them.
> • Incessant playing of the victim card.
> • Steadfast refusal to take responsibility.
> • Hysterical response to petty insults and imagined slights.
>
> If you are able to fulfill all of these requirements, I can practically guarantee that you will be a successful Fatfuck clone.
Lol.
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,659
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,661
WSD !NvEXY0NyQI replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,662
@previous (B)
> N-no! The last two doxmases destroyed so many! Surely, we can be spared this year?
What is doxmas? It sounds fun!
> N-no! The last two doxmases destroyed so many! Surely, we can be spared this year?
What is doxmas? It sounds fun!
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #742,664
How to successfully clone Fatfuck:
Post on Minichan.
Post on Minichan.
ko joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #742,669
@previous (F)
> How to successfully clone Fatfuck:
>
> Post on Minichan.
@742,654 (C)
> >mattchan
these
> How to successfully clone Fatfuck:
>
> Post on Minichan.
@742,654 (C)
> >mattchan
these
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #742,679
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #742,686
@previous (WSD !m2cp3rR5zw)
@742,657 (B)
As evidenced by the Toni Saga. Of course, he gave himself away when he tried to justify his pedophillic tendencies:
http://minichan.org/topic/45908
Compare with Wildchild's autistic meltdown over being called a child-molester on an obscure online forum:
http://minichan.org/topic/57854#reply_742415
@742,657 (B)
As evidenced by the Toni Saga. Of course, he gave himself away when he tried to justify his pedophillic tendencies:
http://minichan.org/topic/45908
Compare with Wildchild's autistic meltdown over being called a child-molester on an obscure online forum:
http://minichan.org/topic/57854#reply_742415
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,688
@previous (A)
> As evidenced by the Toni Saga. Of course, he gave himself away when he tried to justify his pedophillic tendencies:
>
> http://minichan.org/topic/45908
>
> Compare with Wildchild's autistic meltdown over being called a child-molester on an obscure online forum:
>
> http://minichan.org/topic/57854#reply_742415
Aren't you a bit too obsessed?
> As evidenced by the Toni Saga. Of course, he gave himself away when he tried to justify his pedophillic tendencies:
>
> http://minichan.org/topic/45908
>
> Compare with Wildchild's autistic meltdown over being called a child-molester on an obscure online forum:
>
> http://minichan.org/topic/57854#reply_742415
Aren't you a bit too obsessed?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,689
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,690
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,691
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,692
I have absolute proof that OP is Matt and is a child molester.
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,693
@previous (J)
@OP
> Not as difficult as it may sound. Let's look at the similarities between Matt and Wildchild:
>
> • Desperate need for negative attention.
> • Transgendered personas (cf: Matt/Sophie).
> • Extreme over-reaction to Syntax.
> • Everything has to be about them.
> • Incessant playing of the victim card.
> • Steadfast refusal to take responsibility.
> • Hysterical response to petty insults and imagined slights.
>
> If you are able to fulfill all of these requirements, I can practically guarantee that you will be a successful Fatfuck clone.
Fuck off pedophile Matt. Go kill yourself.
@OP
> Not as difficult as it may sound. Let's look at the similarities between Matt and Wildchild:
>
> • Desperate need for negative attention.
> • Transgendered personas (cf: Matt/Sophie).
> • Extreme over-reaction to Syntax.
> • Everything has to be about them.
> • Incessant playing of the victim card.
> • Steadfast refusal to take responsibility.
> • Hysterical response to petty insults and imagined slights.
>
> If you are able to fulfill all of these requirements, I can practically guarantee that you will be a successful Fatfuck clone.
Fuck off pedophile Matt. Go kill yourself.
Anonymous I double-posted this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,695
> > Not as difficult as it may sound. Let's look at the similarities between Matt and Wildchild:
> >
> > • Desperate need for negative attention.
> > • Transgendered personas (cf: Matt/Sophie).
> > • Extreme over-reaction to Syntax.
> > • Everything has to be about them.
> > • Incessant playing of the victim card.
> > • Steadfast refusal to take responsibility.
> > • Hysterical response to petty insults and imagined slights.
> >
> > If you are able to fulfill all of these requirements, I can practically guarantee that you will be a successful Fatfuck clone.
>
> Fuck off pedophile Matt. Go kill yourself.
By that I meant OP is a known pedophile, not @742,692 (J)
> >
> > • Desperate need for negative attention.
> > • Transgendered personas (cf: Matt/Sophie).
> > • Extreme over-reaction to Syntax.
> > • Everything has to be about them.
> > • Incessant playing of the victim card.
> > • Steadfast refusal to take responsibility.
> > • Hysterical response to petty insults and imagined slights.
> >
> > If you are able to fulfill all of these requirements, I can practically guarantee that you will be a successful Fatfuck clone.
>
> Fuck off pedophile Matt. Go kill yourself.
By that I meant OP is a known pedophile, not @742,692 (J)
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,697
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,699
@previous (H)
> >I have absolute proof that OP is Matt and is a child molester.
>
> Post it then, faggot!
I did. OP is Matt, and nobody can deny that.
> >I have absolute proof that OP is Matt and is a child molester.
>
> Post it then, faggot!
I did. OP is Matt, and nobody can deny that.
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,700
Anonymous I replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,701
@previous (H)
> So, no proof. Thanks.
The fact that OP isn't able to prove that they're not Matt is proof enough for me, thanks.
> So, no proof. Thanks.
The fact that OP isn't able to prove that they're not Matt is proof enough for me, thanks.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,702
Yeah OP, if you aren't a known pedophile named Matt then prove it. Otherwise you're a pedophile and a child molester.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,704
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,705
@previous (K)
> Sure is pedomatt in here.
Nice try OP, are you mad because you got called out for being a pedophile, so now you're samefagging?
> Sure is pedomatt in here.
Nice try OP, are you mad because you got called out for being a pedophile, so now you're samefagging?
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,706
It's decided. I think we have all AGREED unconditionally that OP hasn't provided proof that he is Matt and he is a fucking PEDOPHILE until he does.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,707
@previous (L)
@742,705 (J)
@742,701 (I)
All of a sudden, Wildchild seem conspicuously absent from this thread.
@742,705 (J)
@742,701 (I)
All of a sudden, Wildchild seem conspicuously absent from this thread.
Anonymous J replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,708
@previous (A)
> All of a sudden, Wildchild seem conspicuously absent from this thread.
Lol, trying to distract from your well documented and known pedophilia. Okay, Matt.
> All of a sudden, Wildchild seem conspicuously absent from this thread.
Lol, trying to distract from your well documented and known pedophilia. Okay, Matt.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,747
Every one in this thread n OP owe me for waste of my tyme reading this insane ramble of jambel
Anonymous C replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,752
Bob Ross joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #742,777
