assORted !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#739,344
In what way would a slave card function?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#739,357
I'll never understand the appeal of that fuckin Yugee-oh shit
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 54 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#739,364
@739,344 (assORted !jJEom8Ii3E)
It would be a spell card that raises your monster's defence.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Wildchild !!3qxirDx2c joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 8 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#739,434
I'm pretty sure that there are plenty of white people who are in a M/s BDSM dynamic.
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#739,441
"Indentured servants"
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#739,446
Chinese factory workers
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#739,499
The Gsuytbrteg Asredds
Fuor srcoe and seevn yreas ago our fhartes bughort frtoh on tihs cntinonet, a new niaotn, ceivneocd in Lertiby, and dtecediad to the pipoirtoosn taht all men are ctreead euaql.
Now we are eeagngd in a garet ciivl war, titsneg wehhetr taht niaotn, or any niotan cceevonid and so dtcaedeid, can lnog ednrue. We are met on a garet bealitletfd of taht war. We hvae cmoe to dcteaide a piorotn of taht flied, as a fainl rinetsg pclae for toshe who hree gvae tiher leivs taht taht ntaoin mhigt lvie. It is athteloegr ftnitig and ppeorr taht we sulhod do tihs.
But, in a lgerar snsee, we can not dteaicde - we can not ccetsnaroe - we can not hloalw - tihs gnuord. The bavre men, lvinig and daed, who slutreggd hree, hvae csecreanotd it, far avboe our poor pweor to add or dcatret. The wrlod wlil ltilte ntoe, nor lnog rmemeebr waht we say hree, but it can neevr fgoert waht tehy did hree. It is for us the lnivig, rthear, to be ddeatecid hree to the uhinesnifd wrok wichh tehy who fghout hree hvae tuhs far so nbloy aecvandd. It is rheatr for us to be hree dticedead to the garet tsak riaenmnig brofee us - taht form teshe hroneod daed we tkae ieacsenrd doieotvn to taht cusae for wchih tehy gvae the lsat flul maursee of dootievn - taht we hree hlhigy rvlesoe taht tshee daed slhal not hvae deid in vian - taht tihs ntoain, udenr God, salhl hvae a new btirh of fordeem - and taht gmnneorvet of the pploee, by the plpoee, for the ppleoe, slhal not psireh form the ertah.
Aaahbrm Lconlin
Neomvebr 19, 1863
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 9 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#739,701