Topic: The truth about my identity.
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. started this discussion 9 years ago #57,383
I'm not Matt, I'm actually Sophie aka autphag and all of you are ethnomogous homozogous negroids and I am actively working to end the harassment prepertrated against me by the authorities, particularly counterintelligence but also law enforcement ones, and they didn't really go away with treatment, proving the capitulation to psychiatry ultimately futile. I would welcome an attempt on my life simply to end these supernatural conspiracies which have frought my life with groundshking fear to a degree even wild abandonment couldn't describe adequately. It has tormented me with unshakable turmoil I doubt I will ever recover from.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #737,552
Hi Matt.
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,554
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
> Hi Matt.
I should probably make it exceedingly clear at this juncture that I've disgruntled a huge number amongst the staff body in the NHS and this will have motivated them to work in an internecine manner with outside agencies to assure my destruction. However accurately I might have characterized certain pathological tendencies of the female, in an effort to show superiority of self awareness despite sharing weaknesses therein, the matriarchy just simply don't want what could have well been their equivalent to JFK had they been less antipathic towards the idea of an ideologically Aspergian transwoman.
These backwards and retrograde matriarchal sociopaths have come on to the equivalent of the Apes' monolith if those Apes' arrogance had compelled them to piss all over it.
> Hi Matt.
I should probably make it exceedingly clear at this juncture that I've disgruntled a huge number amongst the staff body in the NHS and this will have motivated them to work in an internecine manner with outside agencies to assure my destruction. However accurately I might have characterized certain pathological tendencies of the female, in an effort to show superiority of self awareness despite sharing weaknesses therein, the matriarchy just simply don't want what could have well been their equivalent to JFK had they been less antipathic towards the idea of an ideologically Aspergian transwoman.
These backwards and retrograde matriarchal sociopaths have come on to the equivalent of the Apes' monolith if those Apes' arrogance had compelled them to piss all over it.
The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,556
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,559
@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
> > this much effort
If a Jew dances to persuade you be force that a gaudy transvestitic autogynephile has more intrinsic (and yes that is the word I used) female qualities than somebody who actually has dysphoria then you believe it, just as you would believe that Jewish bolshevist revolutionaries would persuade you to replace your rations with feces.
You should be a spokesfaggot for the Negro Health Service over here. I'm sure they'd love your malaproprisms.
> > this much effort
If a Jew dances to persuade you be force that a gaudy transvestitic autogynephile has more intrinsic (and yes that is the word I used) female qualities than somebody who actually has dysphoria then you believe it, just as you would believe that Jewish bolshevist revolutionaries would persuade you to replace your rations with feces.
You should be a spokesfaggot for the Negro Health Service over here. I'm sure they'd love your malaproprisms.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,561
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 55 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,562
@previous (D)
> >Being this butthurt
Orthogenic autism the disease is not orthogenic intellectual Asperger profile the condition. Severe autism is easily engineered, but mild autism is a racial phenotype known AS the Mongoloid racial IQ profile. Chinks would be killing themselves and, upon eventually coming to this conclusion, in a trollshield esque manner slink away from their previous accomplishments.
> >Being this butthurt
Orthogenic autism the disease is not orthogenic intellectual Asperger profile the condition. Severe autism is easily engineered, but mild autism is a racial phenotype known AS the Mongoloid racial IQ profile. Chinks would be killing themselves and, upon eventually coming to this conclusion, in a trollshield esque manner slink away from their previous accomplishments.
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,563
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,565
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
> >being this Matt
So I'm being compared disfavourably to a sociopath who bullshits entry into any society or organization in order to wreck it from the inside? Incredible. You actually hold ASPD psychos in high regard because of their status. Are you listening to yourself?
IQg, more than attainment, matters. Illustrating an example, a 100-IQ MBA will inherit a company only to ruin it; a 130-IQ high school dropout will, in instances of familial connection, gain successorship of a company only to continue its prosperity with their wit and keen.
They had diminished me by presuming me to be inferior due to an inherited rather than innate socio-economic status, so I had adopted racial realism to explain away the petit-bourgeois Marxist ideogogues of 'non-cosmpolitan unsophisticaton'.
They had diminished me by dissenting from my reciprocation of friendship and terminating it on the most unreasonable of perceived slights.
They had diminished me by excluding me from society -- no workplace will take me, nobody will seriously intellectually examine my meticulously crafted works and indeed, work to distract me from them here.
They had diminished me through, in a rather gumptious display that they would have the nerve to even bare feelings of slighted abuse and anger, deeply calculated provocations disguised under hypocritically self-serving pretenses of charitability hiding a wider agenda. If Haselgrove was to prevent me from being, the response, though exaggerated, was rooted in a semblance of etho-moral preposition, a certain reciprocation of that which she had deprived me.
> >being this Matt
So I'm being compared disfavourably to a sociopath who bullshits entry into any society or organization in order to wreck it from the inside? Incredible. You actually hold ASPD psychos in high regard because of their status. Are you listening to yourself?
IQg, more than attainment, matters. Illustrating an example, a 100-IQ MBA will inherit a company only to ruin it; a 130-IQ high school dropout will, in instances of familial connection, gain successorship of a company only to continue its prosperity with their wit and keen.
They had diminished me by presuming me to be inferior due to an inherited rather than innate socio-economic status, so I had adopted racial realism to explain away the petit-bourgeois Marxist ideogogues of 'non-cosmpolitan unsophisticaton'.
They had diminished me by dissenting from my reciprocation of friendship and terminating it on the most unreasonable of perceived slights.
They had diminished me by excluding me from society -- no workplace will take me, nobody will seriously intellectually examine my meticulously crafted works and indeed, work to distract me from them here.
They had diminished me through, in a rather gumptious display that they would have the nerve to even bare feelings of slighted abuse and anger, deeply calculated provocations disguised under hypocritically self-serving pretenses of charitability hiding a wider agenda. If Haselgrove was to prevent me from being, the response, though exaggerated, was rooted in a semblance of etho-moral preposition, a certain reciprocation of that which she had deprived me.
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,567
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,568
@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
> Quit while you're ahead, Matt.
Alexander Gillespie does and is continual ad hominem attacks are mostly immaterial to an ideology that I only consider to be applicable in the future when the Aspergian and her circumstances improve to to the condition where in the dysgenics no longer exist to pressurize downwards his abilities intellectually such that the lolcow all but ceases to exist in stipulate a prerequisite for that, which is the securement of her racial ststus' recognition in order for provisions in her independence nationally to be secured and the appropriate reparations to realise this
It has nothing to do with the fact that there is an inherent quality of autism which means there is an inability to understand gender but rather you're quoting the work of somebody who clearly has borderline exceptionalism along with autism and you comflate him with me. It has more to do with somebody's intelligence levels for this is the main determinant of being able to distinguish paradigms along the lines of concrete characteristic characterizations
> Quit while you're ahead, Matt.
Alexander Gillespie does and is continual ad hominem attacks are mostly immaterial to an ideology that I only consider to be applicable in the future when the Aspergian and her circumstances improve to to the condition where in the dysgenics no longer exist to pressurize downwards his abilities intellectually such that the lolcow all but ceases to exist in stipulate a prerequisite for that, which is the securement of her racial ststus' recognition in order for provisions in her independence nationally to be secured and the appropriate reparations to realise this
It has nothing to do with the fact that there is an inherent quality of autism which means there is an inability to understand gender but rather you're quoting the work of somebody who clearly has borderline exceptionalism along with autism and you comflate him with me. It has more to do with somebody's intelligence levels for this is the main determinant of being able to distinguish paradigms along the lines of concrete characteristic characterizations
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,570
Jesus
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 50 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,572
@737,562 (Wildchild !GjXpatdBd.)
@737,565 (Wildchild !GjXpatdBd.)
@737,568 (Wildchild !GjXpatdBd.)
Hey Matt, your illegible gibberish was tl/dr
@737,565 (Wildchild !GjXpatdBd.)
@737,568 (Wildchild !GjXpatdBd.)
Hey Matt, your illegible gibberish was tl/dr
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,573
@previous (D)
> Hey Matt, your illegible gibberish was tl/dr
Because correlations like "muh academic talisman = high WAIS quotient" hold out in the absolute and are not exactly the kind of logical distortion I'd expect to see in a negrotypically minded retrograde.
My first work, The Wisdom of Autphag, contains a number of criticisms of scientific empiricism: first, the etymological, epistemological and etiological basis for its finding, which I'd established well before the neoreactionaries took off, has its presumptions based on the purity of the analysis of data as a reliable midpoint that is completely unassailable by deliberate manipulations in the process of methodological construction of the analytical method of rubric/assessment, and that much was deliberate. The Jews during the Enlightenment were certain that they could foist scientific empiricism as a means of deliberately forging certain phenomena in society, the autism apparatus of matriarchal domination, medicalizing what was essentially a heirarchical stratification tool to degenerate them in ensuring the "destruction of patriarchy" and the usurpration of neo-matriarchalism, under the guise of a grassroots political movement like feminism, despite abudant documentation of its Judeomasonic origins. Since none of you are genuinely interested in concepts like absolute truth and genuine epistemological investigation though, I'll leave you to brew in your swill for now, sows.
> Hey Matt, your illegible gibberish was tl/dr
Because correlations like "muh academic talisman = high WAIS quotient" hold out in the absolute and are not exactly the kind of logical distortion I'd expect to see in a negrotypically minded retrograde.
My first work, The Wisdom of Autphag, contains a number of criticisms of scientific empiricism: first, the etymological, epistemological and etiological basis for its finding, which I'd established well before the neoreactionaries took off, has its presumptions based on the purity of the analysis of data as a reliable midpoint that is completely unassailable by deliberate manipulations in the process of methodological construction of the analytical method of rubric/assessment, and that much was deliberate. The Jews during the Enlightenment were certain that they could foist scientific empiricism as a means of deliberately forging certain phenomena in society, the autism apparatus of matriarchal domination, medicalizing what was essentially a heirarchical stratification tool to degenerate them in ensuring the "destruction of patriarchy" and the usurpration of neo-matriarchalism, under the guise of a grassroots political movement like feminism, despite abudant documentation of its Judeomasonic origins. Since none of you are genuinely interested in concepts like absolute truth and genuine epistemological investigation though, I'll leave you to brew in your swill for now, sows.
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,576
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #737,578
@previous (D)
Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
Anonymous D replied with this 9 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #737,586
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #737,591
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #737,594
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,608
Guess what?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,656
@737,578 (Wildchild !GjXpatdBd.)
> Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
What happened to your new shtick to be friendly and calm with everyone, Matt? Man you really do get exposed so easily lol.
> Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
What happened to your new shtick to be friendly and calm with everyone, Matt? Man you really do get exposed so easily lol.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,661
Wildchild !GjXpatdBd. (OP) replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,663
@737,656 (H)
> > Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
>
> What happened to your new shtick to be friendly and calm with everyone, Matt? Man you really do get exposed so easily lol.
Because I got annoyed due to the Matt shit being quite annoying..
> > Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
>
> What happened to your new shtick to be friendly and calm with everyone, Matt? Man you really do get exposed so easily lol.
Because I got annoyed due to the Matt shit being quite annoying..
Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,664
@previous (Wildchild !GjXpatdBd.)
> > > Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
> >
> > What happened to your new shtick to be friendly and calm with everyone, Matt? Man you really do get exposed so easily lol.
>
> Because I got annoyed due to the Matt shit being quite annoying..
But why do you get "annoyed", Matt? Surely this silly shit doesn't actually matter to you, does it? Why do you get riled up by such trivial nonsense?
> > > Well you aren't even attempting to have a real discussion and abusing my superior autistic affective empathy to intimidate me into an extreme flight response in order to dominate me with your matriarchal, negrotypical feminine essence, cuntface.
> >
> > What happened to your new shtick to be friendly and calm with everyone, Matt? Man you really do get exposed so easily lol.
>
> Because I got annoyed due to the Matt shit being quite annoying..
But why do you get "annoyed", Matt? Surely this silly shit doesn't actually matter to you, does it? Why do you get riled up by such trivial nonsense?
Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,665
@previous (H)
this is the online equivalent of 'why do you keep hitting yourself' and you know it
stap
this is the online equivalent of 'why do you keep hitting yourself' and you know it
stap
Anonymous H replied with this 9 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,666
Syntax replied with this 9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,672
brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #737,678
lol good one Matt