> >This is like the question, ‘Will you stop beating your wife?’ HAAAAAAAAA HA HA HAAAAAA
no it isn't. it's not that linguistically difficult to understand here, come on
brie !kGoudaMCFA joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#733,124
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
It is almost the same question and could have been answered the same.
He doesn't have to say 'No, I will stop using cluster bombs', he could just as easily have said 'I don't do that'.
There is no expectation of a one word, yes/no answer.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
brie !kGoudaMCFA double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#733,125
@previous (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
The way he answered implies that he does use cluster bombs though, lol.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#733,128
@733,124 (brie !kGoudaMCFA)
come on, I say. The wording obviously refers how with a new government, they might or might not continue with policies or plans of the earlier government. Anyone familiar with the change over of governments knows this. It's picayune to autistic levels to miss that.
brie !kGoudaMCFA replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#733,133
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
And he could have taken the opportunity to answer the question but instead made a joke about implications.
batu joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#733,139
> > >This is like the question, ‘Will you stop beating your wife?’ HAAAAAAAAA HA HA HAAAAAA > > no it isn't. it's not that linguistically difficult to understand here, come on
it was a loaded question
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#733,141