Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: I don't believe people's votes should be confidential

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY started this discussion 10 years ago #56,935

I have a deep need to know who around me voted for Trump. As of now, I'm just working on the assumption that every white man I see voted for Trump, which is arguably unfair to some. I think we should have signs that say who we voted for so I know who to mistreat.

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #732,931

Externally hosted imageHow does this person feel right now?

batu joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 42 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,932

in my area im noticing a lot of out of season tank tops and MAGA hats
its like they want you to know

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,934

@previous (batu)
The Trump yard signs were removed pretty quickly from most yards here. I like to think the inhabitants got a terrible feeling of "what have I done?" and wanted to hide the evidence right away. That's what I tell myself.

batu replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,935

@732,931 (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw)
is that Bulma

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 10 years ago, 2 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,936

Better yet. You should dress in brown shirts and beat down anyone who disagrees with you.

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,937

@OP
White women are part of the problem. Trump could not have won without white women.

Http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/opinion/white-women-voted-trump-now-what.html

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,938

@previous (Metæ)
Yeah, but it's not feasible to glare at every white woman, too. I have to draw a line somewhere.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,940

@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
You only have to glare at 53% of them! ??

Eternal God Emperor Obama joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,941

I'm going to send everyone who voted trump to the fema camps. They are traitors to my rule.

batu replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,942

@732,940 (Metæ)

> You only have to glare at 53% of them! ??

that's so crazy 2 me. too much

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,944

@previous (batu)
Easy. Just for every hundred white women you see, make sure to glare at 53 of them.

Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,947

@OP
Let's pretend that every Trump voter was forced to wear a conspicuous red T (for Trump) on their clothes at all times. What would you like to see done to them?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,949

No let's not!

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,975

@732,940 (Metæ)
Yes, but which 53%? Are you missing the whole point of the thread? God.

@732,947 (Metæ)
I would no longer hold doors for them, let them out in traffic, or give them free legal advice. I think it's fair not to waste social graces on trumpers.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,980

@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
Well, statistically if you berate 53 out of 100 men, at least 3 of them must have been Trumpers.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,001

@732,975 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
> Yes, but which 53%?
Okay but only 63% of FUCKING WHITE MALES voted for Trump.
While Mr. Obama won 35 percent of white, male voters in 2012, Clinton lost to Trump among this group by 63 percent to 31 percent.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-exit-polls-how-donald-trump-won-the-us-presidency.

So when you glare at a hundred FUCKING WHITE MALES you're glaring at 31 Hillary voters thanks.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,003

@previous (Metæ)
THAT IS THE FUCKING POINT OF MY TOPIC
I WANT TO KNOW WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP
JESUS CHRIST META

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,004

@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
Hey aren't you proud of me though for publicly disclosing how I voted?

beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,006

@previous (Metæ)
tbh you should be more embarrassed by it

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,011

@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
:(

But I gave a lot of local Democrats votes.

Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,014

@732,940 (Metæ)
Soon out of here for Friday nite festivities so cannot look up the numbers
I thought it was the dumb as fuck uneducated white men and white woman that voted for Trump.

Becky if they are somewhat intelligent neighbors no worries. Perhaps like Brexit people will have 2nd thoughts - besides looks like Trump is facing reality that half the country is mad as fuck at him and he damn well no's he will fail with that long term.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,019

@previous (Syntax)
Nate Aluminum

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,022

@previous (Metæ)
Just out of time and I have not looked at Silvers site since I put a house up for sale (Now sold in a way I get it back in a few years)

I do not even have time to look to see how much ahead Hillary is in the popular vote - Ahead or behind its 50-50 with Mad as fuck people again happy clueless uneducated people You excluded but hey u damn well no he better keep the stock market up banks rolling in cash economy with no glitch and national debt no going up and getting it wayy down and people back to making steel er he is clueless that modern plants automate steel production and use very few people who mostly keep the robots going

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,036

I have a co-worker who is going around and telling the residents that it's their fault that Trump won. It's really bad here.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,037

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
But they're all senile and/or physically disabled. How can you hold them responsible for that?!

(Edited 19 seconds later.)

Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,038

@previous (Metæ)
black people logic

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,041

The Blue states will secede.

Jubilee Starshine joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,043

@733,036 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
a bigoted, ignorant, stupid, and reckless sexual predator who lost the popular vote won the presidency and more than half the country is outraged. it's only getting started, my friend. have you read who's being considered for cabinet positions? he's not about to just grab america by the pussy, he's about to shove a fist up there.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,047

@733,037 (Metæ)
@733,038 (G)
...kind of true

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,048

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What percentage of the residents even vote?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,049

@733,043 (Jubilee Starshine)
The people protesting should have voted

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 45 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,050

@733,048 (Metæ)
A very small amount. Most hid who they were voting for because of fear of retaliation

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,051

@733,049 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Protests are taking place in very liberal states or very liberal areas of states. There's a decent chance they voted and since Hillary won the popular vote they feel like their vote was meaningless because she lost anyway. FWIW I don't agree with the protests and tbink they're totally misguided but it isn't just dumb whiny liberals who were too lazy to vote necessarily.

(Edited 23 seconds later.)

Jubilee Starshine joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,052

@733,049 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
that they didn't is a weird generalization to make. he lost the popular vote, plenty of people voted for democrats. in case you haven't been paying attention to the man, protests of a trump victory has been obvious since even before the primaries. the protests won't stop.

like i said, democrats are gutted. there is nothing left to do but have a populist uprising on the left. there is no political mechnism left to oppose a conservative agenda, not to mention he is disliked by the majority of americans if the popular vote means anything. expect that to only get worse for him as a radical republican agenda is railroaded through.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,053

@733,050 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
If I lived in LA or Portland or Atlanta or Miami or NYC I would cover my car in Clinton stickers and wear an I'm With Her shirt for the next few months.

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 56 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,057

Yeah FUCK YOU 2017 Toyota Camry! That'll teach you to vote for fascism you reasonably priced very roomy midsize sedan piece of shit FUCK!!

Metæ triple-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,058

I dont care if you donated $417,000 to Hillary Clinton's campaign, Bank of America, I will NOT hesitate to fuck your shit up!!!

Metæ quadruple-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,060

You're fired! Get it?! BECAUSE I THREW A MOLOTOV COCKTAIL THROUGH YOUR STORE WINDOW AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Goddess Empress Hillary replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,062

@733,058 (Metæ)
Obviously they didn't donate enough to my campaign. They should of donated $100,000 a day. FUCKING IDIOTS. I'm gonna order Janet Yellen to impose sanctions on them!

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 58 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,063

I'm reasonably sure this NYPD officer can amend the Constitution

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,065

@733,057 (Metæ)
To be fair, that car really shouldn't have had such a big window if it didn't want to get smashed.

batuo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,067

@733,063 (Metæ)
lol look at that kid krying like 'mom stop'

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
car was asking for it

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,068

@733,065 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
@previous (batuo)
Did you guys notice the black Camry got smashed up, but the white one was unscathed?

Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,069

Don't mind me, friends, I'm just off to read the Portland Tribune and play some late night softball.

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,071

@previous (Metæ)
Maybe he is a newspaper container deliveryman with a phobia of baseballs.

batuo replied with this 10 years ago, 0 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,072

@733,069 (Metæ)
this fools looting random shit with a baseball bat and he aint even wear a belt

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,073

@733,068 (Metæ)
#BlackCamrysMatter

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,074

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,075

@733,071 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Fastballs can travel up to 90mph and cause serious injury. I'd be afraid of them, too.

Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,076

@733,072 (batuo)
> this fools looting random shit with a baseball bat and he aint even wear a belt
No time to waste getting dressed, people have got to read the Portland Tribune.

Metæ triple-posted this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,077

Just practicing to smash the glass ceiling

Metæ quadruple-posted this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,078

Eat cops? I'd rather eat a COOKY

Anonymous N replied with this 10 years ago, 16 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,079

@733,075 (Metæ)
This just makes me admire fireballs, honestly.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 50 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,081

Morning wood

Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,082

Motoring al fresco

DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 51 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,088

@OP

As much as I admire your dedication beckarony, you are now part of the problem.

Your SJW lefty friends will turn on you, because #FuckWhiteFeminism. Except if you're black, that would explain the love for black people (your fellow people in that case) and micropenises (got sick of all the BBC?).

So all in all, even if you figure out how to identify and glare into the correct 53%, you will be judged by 100% of the SJW lefties. Have a lovely weekend.

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,089

@previous (DasSheeple !pE87XcIVxw)
The BBC is fine. They make funny TV programmes, and have good news coverage. There's no need to get sick of them just yet.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 15 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,090

Also this rioting is interesting in another way too: it shows that whether or not the candidate accepts the result of the election has no effect on whether their supporters accept the results.

Hillary Clinton accepted the results of the election, conceded with grace and dignity, and did her level best to encourage a peaceful transition of power. That didn't stop her supporters from rioting in several major cities.

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,092

@previous (Metæ)
That doesn't seem surprising to me. IMO, this election in particular was so divisive that these sorts of things would be happening whichever way the election went.

Whichever candidate you supported, I don't think it's too controversial to say it's a damn shame that America got so divided over it. National unity is important, I think.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,093

@previous (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
The saddest thing is the people whose property is getting damaged were more likely than not Clinton supporters and the neighborhoods getting trashed were solidly pro-Clinton. This is going to increase support for firm government "law and order" candidates.

Emil !r1rpNPeqN6 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,097

Why yall wanna mistreat Trump voters?

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,101

swastikas are showing up here now it's scary

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,102

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Where's "here"?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,106

@733,051 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
@733,052 (Jubilee Starshine)
Many black people don't vote

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,107

@733,101 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
What's sad is that they were probably drawn by leftists. People are already getting in trouble for faking hate crimes.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,108

@733,106 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
45 percent of registered voters didn't vote. This isn't unique to black people.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,109

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
But it's a higher percentage of black people that don't vote

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,111

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
That's true but just saying "many black people don't vote" isn't really telling because many people overall don't vote, and only about two thirds of all eligible voters are even registered.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,112

@733,102 (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
canadia!

@733,107 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
no i really do not think so
leftists and radicals are going out covering them up or turning them into the windows logo etc

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,116

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I would think Canada is largely safe from nationalist types? Not that I'd necessarily know, but I haven't heard of any Canadian charismatic, right-wing polticians coming close to enforcing their goals.

@733,107 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Agreed. It is more likely a leftist conspiracy than actual Neo-nazis.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 59 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,126

@previous (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
No not a conspiracy. It's people who feel outraged and manufacture hate crimes in order to try and spread that outraged. Many people have already been caught faking hate crimes

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,127

@733,112 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
The same people drawing them are also the people covering them up

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 triple-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,129

@733,111 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Jesus Christ Mark. If I had said black people get lupus would you have felt the need to say all people get lupus, do it isn't worth studying any genetic predisposition?

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,130

@733,126 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
True. When one sees racist iconography scrawled in walls, it is logical to assume it was probably the work of scheming leftists. Neo-nazis are known for their aversion to vandalism.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,131

@previous (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Okay let's ignore the people caught faking hate crimes. When Daddy Trump gets sworn in, Swastikas will replace the stars on the grand ole flag. Praise Jesus

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,132

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I don't thik faking hate crimes is good, I just think it's hilarious that you hear of swastikas being graffitied and immediately assume that left-wingers are the likeliest culprit.

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,134

@733,127 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
what that doens't make any sense

@733,116 (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
it's not like institutionalised far right but it's there, there are people around who are into this stuff
especially quebec which has always been xenophobic due to its persecution complex from the anglos

(Edited 30 seconds later.)

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,135

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Yes it does. It's being done as a morale builder.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,137

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
except i personally know a lot of the people who are doing this and they are not spraypainting swastikas

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,138

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Okay

batu replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,144

@733,126 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> No not a conspiracy. It's people who feel outraged and manufacture hate crimes in order to try and spread that outraged. Many people have already been caught faking hate crimes

lol where

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,145

@733,134 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It would serve two purposes: first, make Trump supporters look racist and call media attention to the cause, and two make the protesters look good (we're covering up hate). And as Kook said it would build morale.

I'm not saying the swastikas were fake but if, hypothetically, they were that would be my take on it.

batu replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,146

@733,135 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
swastikas are only a 'morale builder' if you're a white supremacist kook
I was about to ask what backwards ass world u lived in but then I remembered Florida

batu double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,147

@733,145 (Metæ)
nobody has to try to make Trump supporters look racist. this doesn't make anyone look good

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,153

@previous (batu)
And no one has to try to make Hillary supporters look violent. But covering up swastikas makes the people covering them up look good.

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,155

@733,145 (Metæ)
i live in canada
not trump support so much as a rise in white supremacism
and it's not protesters just random non-organised people

i don;t know where kook is coming from with this

(Edited 54 seconds later.)

batu replied with this 10 years ago, 22 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,156

@733,153 (Metæ)
what's with the assumption that they're Hillary supporters? can only be sure that they are anti trump. not supporters of anything. just angry people. if someone covers up a swastika I don't care who did it I'm just glad the swastikas gone

batu double-posted this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,157

@733,155 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
lol. NO. it was Canadian HILLARY SUPPORTERS trying to LOOK GOOD you're WRONG

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,160

@733,129 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
It just wasn't relevant to what I wrote and it seemed weird to bring up black people specifically when it's all races of people rioting.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,161

@733,156 (batu)
Because it happened immediately after Hillary won the popular vote and lost the election, and the riots are taking place in precincts with overwhelming Hillary support. Also because a lot of the signs mentioned Trump, who was Hillary Clinton's opponent in the election.

batu replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,162

@previous (Metæ)
did you forget the course of this election?? nobody even liked Hillary except maybe mark and Becky

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,163

@733,155 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
You are correct, in that bigots are affected by these things too. Brexit saw a significant rise in hate crimes, and I see some news sites reporting a similar rise following Trump's victory.

I think it's perfectly plausible that these swastika guys are Neo-Nazis emboldened by Trump's victory. They likely see it as a step in favour of their ideology (emphasis on them seeing it that way).

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,165

@733,162 (batu)
fwiw I don't "like" Hillary I just thought she was probably better than Bernie and definitely better than Trump, and no one else was going to defend her here.

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,176

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I, Killer Lettuce, also defended her!

Although, admittedly, that defence was probably more attacking Trump.

Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,177

@733,162 (batu)
@733,165 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
For what it's worth none of the Hillary supporters I've talked to in real life or on other forums really "liked" Hillary, either. 99% of Hillary support was anti-Trump or "lesser of two evils".

So I guess it's fair to say these aren't "pro-Hillary" protests but anti-Trump. I guess my point is that if Hillary had won these riots would not be happening.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Emil !r1rpNPeqN6 replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,179

@733,130 (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Of course the left would have nothing to gain by playing there victim card and making fake attacks to blame on the big bad Trump. Are you for real.

Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #733,182

@previous (Emil !r1rpNPeqN6)
I didn't say that these supposed leftist conspirators would have nothing to gain, just that claiming racist graffiti was "probably" the work of liberals seemed wrong.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.