Topic: So what does Trump have to do to make sure Hillary goes to jail?
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 10 years ago #56,906
I'm legitimately curious. She wasn't found guilty, was she? What would Trump need to do to put Hillary Clinton behind bars?
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #732,567
The President can't put people behind bars. I suggest you take Khizr Khan's advice and read the Constitution.
DasSheeple joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #732,576
He just needs to not interfere with the investigations, and ofc. be sane enough not to pardon her. If there's any justice in the system becky so firmly believes in, she'll get what she deserves.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #732,579
@732,567 (Metæ)> The President can't put people behind bars.
> I suggest you take Khizr Khan's advice and read the Constitution.
That wood also be most excellent advice for TRUMP
Trump pronounced her guilty as charged.
Cathy I caught Rudy Giuliani being interviewed by O'Rilley yesterday and his question was Rudy will you accept the position of Attorney General and Rudi gave a big smile and send he sure could do that job and of course the next question was - What you going to do to get Clinton locked up (words to that effect) and Rudi Grined ear to ear almost to the point of loss of control,and I think he said that is a possibility.
Of course Clinton can do what Ronald Reagan did when on the stand and questioned about Contragate for Ollies trial and Ronald kept saying `I Don`t Recall`
Lots of `I Don`t Recall`. Clinton's version can include lots of I don't remember. Or just take the
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 39 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,594
@previous (Syntax)I bet there was a deal: if Clinton concedes and goes away quietly, Trump will let bygones be bygones.
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,597
DasSheeple replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,607
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
There's enough in the Podesta emails to put her behind bars for treason.
On one hand we have media who lied to its own people for almost 2 years during the campaign, and on the other we have Wikileaks who isn't affiliated with anyone, whose people end up as fugitives or jailed because they stood up for the truth. 10 years with 0 bogus/falsified leaks.
I trust Wikileaks on this one, she'll get jail time if she ends up in court.
There's enough in the Podesta emails to put her behind bars for treason.
On one hand we have media who lied to its own people for almost 2 years during the campaign, and on the other we have Wikileaks who isn't affiliated with anyone, whose people end up as fugitives or jailed because they stood up for the truth. 10 years with 0 bogus/falsified leaks.
I trust Wikileaks on this one, she'll get jail time if she ends up in court.
batuo joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 43 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,609
@OP
> I'm legitimately curious. She wasn't found guilty, was she?
of what? lol
> What would Trump need to do to put Hillary Clinton behind bars?
be a fucking idiot
he just says what idiots want to hear
he has no intention of 'putting her behind bars'
im interested in seeing how Trump's pending lawsuits pan out tho. weird shit
> I'm legitimately curious. She wasn't found guilty, was she?
of what? lol
> What would Trump need to do to put Hillary Clinton behind bars?
be a fucking idiot
he just says what idiots want to hear
he has no intention of 'putting her behind bars'
im interested in seeing how Trump's pending lawsuits pan out tho. weird shit
(Edited 1 minute later.)
batuo double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,611
and if y'all haven't noticed everyone is being very tactful about this
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,612
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,649
@OP
Grab her by the pussy and drag her to prison.
Grab her by the pussy and drag her to prison.
batuo replied with this 10 years ago, 8 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,650
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,656
batuo replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,660
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,716
If you think he's going to try to or even wants to, you haven't been paying attention and you have no idea how politics work.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,717
Becky will have to weigh in on this. Wikileaks is stolen property - Without any proof it has not been edited. Can anything like that be used in court?
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,723
@previous (Syntax)
Stolen documents can be used in court as long as the lawyers did not steal it. There is a difference between stolen and leaked. Wikileaks has a vetting process for making sure that their info is valid and they have a 10-year track record of never releasing falsified documents. Cyber security experts have examined the emails and found no evidence of tampering.
Stolen documents can be used in court as long as the lawyers did not steal it. There is a difference between stolen and leaked. Wikileaks has a vetting process for making sure that their info is valid and they have a 10-year track record of never releasing falsified documents. Cyber security experts have examined the emails and found no evidence of tampering.
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 7 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,784
@previous (G)
> Stolen documents can be used in court as long as the lawyers did not steal it. There is a difference between stolen and leaked. Wikileaks has a vetting process for making sure that their info is valid and they have a 10-year track record of never releasing falsified documents. Cyber security experts have examined the emails and found no evidence of tampering.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/wikileaks-russia-hillary-clinton-campaign-democrats-229707
You jumped to a dangerous conclusion because normally wikileaks does the document harvesting themselves - This time its Russia giving the harvested data to Wikileaks and if you skim down this article you can find examples of Russia screwing with documents
> Stolen documents can be used in court as long as the lawyers did not steal it. There is a difference between stolen and leaked. Wikileaks has a vetting process for making sure that their info is valid and they have a 10-year track record of never releasing falsified documents. Cyber security experts have examined the emails and found no evidence of tampering.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/wikileaks-russia-hillary-clinton-campaign-democrats-229707
You jumped to a dangerous conclusion because normally wikileaks does the document harvesting themselves - This time its Russia giving the harvested data to Wikileaks and if you skim down this article you can find examples of Russia screwing with documents
Jubilee Starshine joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 46 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,789
i hope she does go to jail. not out of any hatred or dislike of her, or even because i think she's guilty of anything, but because after this travesty of an election maybe she can be useful to us as a political prisoner. and i'm not suggesting that out of spite, but because she will make the perfect martyr for battered liberalism. she will be trump's first jailed political opponent. he can't fire congressmen, right? but he sure is going to find out if he can sic the attorney general on them and put them behind bars - and let's be honest here, do you think any congressman is completely clean? there's nothing they do that could jail them even briefly? no gifts from lobbyists that haven't been scrutinized because they all look the other way and do it themselves? clinton wasn't the only one who paid to play.
lock her up. strike fear into the heart of every congressman sitting in a room alone with trump being asked how they'd feel about this deal, pass this piece of legislation or i'll have a special prosecutor look into your shady dealing.
locking her up is part of the litmus test, and i hope he fucking fails it. if he doesn't, and just falls in line and does his job i'll fucking hate it, but at least we won't be ruled by a fascist. i'll eat my words, unhappy, but i don't think i'll have to. i think he's got it in him to be utterly despicable.
lock her up. strike fear into the heart of every congressman sitting in a room alone with trump being asked how they'd feel about this deal, pass this piece of legislation or i'll have a special prosecutor look into your shady dealing.
locking her up is part of the litmus test, and i hope he fucking fails it. if he doesn't, and just falls in line and does his job i'll fucking hate it, but at least we won't be ruled by a fascist. i'll eat my words, unhappy, but i don't think i'll have to. i think he's got it in him to be utterly despicable.
batuo replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,791
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,792
@previous (batuo)
i quit smoking weed. i'm saving up all my money to buy a seat on a space X rocket to mars as soon as they go on pre-order.
i quit smoking weed. i'm saving up all my money to buy a seat on a space X rocket to mars as soon as they go on pre-order.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,793
@732,789 (Jubilee Starshine)
Obama could on his last day in office pardon her for any crimes of any kind UP2 the moment b4 Trump takes over.
Obama could on his last day in office pardon her for any crimes of any kind UP2 the moment b4 Trump takes over.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,797
@732,789 (Jubilee Starshine)
So she'll be a cross between Nelson Mandela and Ghandi? Also if Trump can have her locked up without charges or trial why can't he fire congressmen?
So she'll be a cross between Nelson Mandela and Ghandi? Also if Trump can have her locked up without charges or trial why can't he fire congressmen?
Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,799
Also this would be a GREAT time for Obama to reschedule marijuana. This is something he can do without Congress. He's got nothing to lose at this point.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #732,800
Just send her to Guantanamo bay and hold her without charges for a decade