I also read the Guardian near-exclusively. Not that I agree with every opinion piece on there, but it aligns pretty much exactly with my political and quality preferences.
butman replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#730,083
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
same. hi five
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#730,089
Robert Creamer
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#730,141
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#730,156
@730,143 (buto)
Thats what i said! @730,145 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
It's a little too smugly left-wing for my tastes, plus I don't think it's good to primarily read things you agree with already, though I'm guilty of doing that from time to time.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 38 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#730,159
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Eh, gotta get my news about UK and world events from somewhere. So I might as well conveniently get it from the mature, extensive publication that broadly aligns with me politically. I like to think that I get a broader, more objective range of information when I want to form an opinion on an issue, but don't we all?
I am also (currently) leaning towards voting Tory next general election, so I'm quite out of step with the Guardian on that.
Becky loves black !nockfC0Z.2 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#730,356
@OP
It's really disappointing when I get all primed to label a thread red and you namefag in the OP.