Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Some people just shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Catharine !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 10 years ago #56,602

And I am one of them. :-(

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #729,577

Dude don't do your local voting if you don't know any of the people

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Catharine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #729,580

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You can just skip that portion?

Jubilee Starshine joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #729,587

@729,577 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
that's not true at all, people vote straight tickets all the time, then it doesn't matter if you know them or not. don't discourage people from voting, tell them how to get educated quickly.

@previous (Catharine !TGirlYJKXM)
you can if you want, or you can pick a party and vote straight ticket which will just vote all republican or all democrat. if you like one party over the other, that's a perfectly valid way to vote.

you can also split your ticket and vote for individuals if you like and if you do that it's not a bad idea to know about the person you're voting for if you're voting against your party. if you're an independent, then it's important you learn about who you're voting for. but it's certainly okay to do something like - usually vote 1 way for presidents, another way for representatives, and another way for judges. i have voted for liberal presidents, conservative representatives, and liberal judges based on nothing more than their party affiliation - i generally prefer a more liberal interpretation of more conservative laws, ergo liberal judges and conservative representatives. i don't really care all that much about knowing the nuts and bolts of every platform of every person running.

and catherine, if you're really concerned about who to vote for, then go to the polls and talk to people handing out fliers and stuff. they'll be canvassing the polling place looking for exactly people like you.

but, it is asking a lot of people to not vote a straight ticket. pick a party, vote straight ticket, easiest thing you can do and no one can give you any grief about voting that way at all. that's how most people do it. and you're under no obligation to tell anyone how you voted or why.

Catharine !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 30 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #729,594

@previous (Jubilee Starshine)
I just marked down all of the democrats in my sample ballot. I'm just not sure about my nonpartisan candidates. Also, I'm not registered with a party. I just tend to find myself agreeing with the Democrats half the time. I did at one point think about re-registering as a Democrat though.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #729,695

WRONG

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #729,712

@729,594 (Catharine !TGirlYJKXM)
As far as Presidential or Senatorial votes go, California is going to be a blue state. It's not going to matter if you show up and write in Mickey Mouse on your ballot. We're going to be a blue state. Focus on your local politics. Read the propositions. That is probably where your vote will matter most.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #729,717

@729,587 (Jubilee Starshine)
I would never do that. What of some of those people are horrible?

Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #729,718

Like people who who disagree with me ??

Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #729,719

@729,717 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
what if what if was what was...

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 29 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #729,720

@previous (Jubilee Starshine)
...

dw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #729,723

especially the people with a differing opinion from mine
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.