No candidate in the modern era of polling has climbed back from a similar deficit in October to win the presidency.
I also see strong evidence of Alzheimer's
Trump ranted yesterday about a bogus question and said to his crowd he never said what the moderator said he said (worked hard to make my English fit the quality of Trump's candidacy)
Moderator read Trumps words and repeated them to Trump and asked him a question. Yesterday he says he never said those words- To many examples of this and at this point I do not think its always a lie - Just simple Alzheimer's
Metæ joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#725,616
@OP > Moderator read Trumps words and repeated them to Trump and asked him a question. Yesterday he says he never said those words- To many examples of this and at this point I do not think its always a lie - Just simple Alzheimer's
I'm a bit skeptical about debate "fact checking" after NBC dropped this bombshell. I'm not sure if the NBC "fact" checkers are anti-Trump or just, like, literally mentally retarded but either way it tends to discredit them.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#725,620
@725,616 (Metæ)
Meta every bit of political insight you offer makes both you and everyone here unfortunate enough to stumble upon it marginally stupider.
You are like a scientific mishap involving a dozen drive time talk radio call in regulars.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,626
@725,616 (Metæ)
What is so crazy about that? Trump says she used a chemical process and NBC pointed out that she used software. Is it kind of trivial in the grand scheme? Sure. Is it wrong? No.
Metæ replied with this 7.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,627
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I think it's pretty obvious to neurotypicals what he meant. Just like using BleachBit doesn't actually involve sodium hypochlorite but if I said I "bleached" my email server you would know what I meant.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7.7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,629
@previous (Metæ)
I actually wouldn't. I didn't even know there was a software called bleachbit until a couple weeks ago and I spend probably more time around computers than the average voter. I don't think it's insane to point that out.
Metæ replied with this 7.7 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,632
@725,629 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So if I said "I had some emails I wanted to get rid of, so I bleached my email server" you would seriously think "Meta physically cleaned the server with an aqueous solution of 4% sodium hypochlorite"?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,633
@725,631 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1) @previous (Metæ)
I would think she physically destroyed her server yes. If you REALLY want to get rid of something, dissolving it in chemicals is usually pretty effective.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 7.7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,637
I think that Fake anon has it right, here.
While I wouldn't assume that Hillary literally poured a bottle of domestos into her server, I wouldn't know exactly what "bleaching" some emails meant and would want that clarified.
Metæ replied with this 7.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,640
@725,633 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) @725,637 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
It's metaphorical. Bleach (and acid) clean things in real life. So it's used to describe cleaning things digitally. Just like the "folder" I keep my reaction images in isn't actually a physical manila folder.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 7.7 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,641
@725,633 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So if someone had said that your inbox had been flooded with emails, would you assume that liquid had been poured into your computer?
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 7.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#725,642
@725,640 (Metæ) > mfw this guy
All of my Neons have been printed and stored in a real life yellow folder. Step it up.
Anyway, I think you have misunderstood my point. I'm not unaware of what a metaphor is, I was unaware of the software called bleachbit. Ergo, further explanation on the "bleached her server" phrase was useful to me.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7.7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,645
@725,641 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
No because emails are electronic in nature so it wouldn't make any sense, and that's a common phrase that everyone has heard. Acid is a physical thing, and acid baths have happened in human history, so when someone says they acid washed something, they could plausibly mean they physically put it in acid. Why is that crazy?
> Biased! The polls are controlled by the crooked liberal media! Lock her up! MAGA!
Huston we have a Problem. Several of the Polls are controlled by the Right Wing Nuts. Wall Street Journal is Owned by the Owner of Fox News. That means there are two of the Polls paid for by or by 50% from the Right Wing Nuts.
You have to scroll wayyyy down on the 2nd list on this document. That Poll had Romney winning by to much and so much so that Fox fired that Polling company and hired one with a much better track record.
NBC FOX Wall Street Journal does NOT do the actual Polling. That is contracted out to people in the business of just running Polls - Not just election which I bet is a small part of the usual business,
Also notice that the majority of the Polls are Republican leaning and I have no clue why that is. I do no why the first debate Poll was heavy Democrat leaning because CNN explained why - CNN by the way as you can see from the list is a very highly rated Poll. This is also true going back to 2008
> > Moderator read Trumps words and repeated them to Trump and asked him a question. Yesterday he says he never said those words- To many examples of this and at this point I do not think its always a lie - Just simple Alzheimer's > I'm a bit skeptical about debate "fact checking" after NBC dropped this bombshell. I'm not sure if the NBC "fact" checkers are anti-Trump or just, like, literally mentally retarded but either way it tends to discredit them. > >http://www.nbcnews.com/card/trump-said-clinton-acid-washed-server-nope-n663436
OK LOL Discard the Fact Checkers. The Report I saw on CNN simply showed a clip of the debate with the ABC Gals question and then showed Trump on Monday calling it bogus and then showed Trump on tape answering that exact question and his words matched 100% the words that were read to him at the debate
When I look at fact checking I use Politico because I do like the Pants on Fire ratings Trump gets and another sight I look at makes Trumps nose grow longer
Metæ replied with this 7.7 years ago, 55 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,655
@725,639 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
If I said "oh shit these old AAA batteries are leaking battery acid all over my TI-86 graphing calculator" would you say "I have no idea what you mean because the electrolyte in alkaline batteries is actually potassium hydroxide which is highly basic as compared to the acidic electrolyte in lead-acid or zinc carbon batteries so I'm going to rate your claim "false" and say you were lying because I take every word everyone ever says literally and I'm unable to understand metaphor or colloquialisms"?
Sadly the beta vesion of BleachBit was used as a weapon on a hack to erase every single bit on 3 servers hard drives. Only the data bases of members files. They left every thing else in tack so the system still operated. Without the members files the Admins/Sysops could not access the server EVER NEVER AGAIN - We members could take our cookies and modify them and even pretend to be Syops or any member we chose to be.
That was back in 2008 and a few months later the final version was released to the public. Software for Linux n UNIX servers that has many useful purposes.
It was a bloody nasty end to a party so many of us enjoyed - bert a couple of anons here - that Masked Bastard who drools on his shirts - and one unmentioned now banned person who holds the record for being banned.
On exam of the hard drives Bleach Bit could be seen to Bleach each bit on the drive 9 full times so that even under a microscope it was impossible to recover the previous recorded state.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 7.7 years ago, 28 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,670
@725,645 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What if I was flooded with emotion because someone had stuffed the ballot box? Or if I had said that Clinton was sweating bullets?
Metæ replied with this 7.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,674
@725,670 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Fake anon would point out that cylindrical conical-tipped projectiles made of lead were not, in fact, emanating from her sudoriparous glands. He would rate your claim "false" on that basis.
I meet people every day who not only do not know what a computer folder is, but have no knowledge of any basic computer operations, including powering on
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7.7 years ago, 37 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,679
@725,674 (Metæ)
Yeah I could only find one other person dumb enough to believe that Hillary Clinton literally used actual chemical bleach to delete her emails.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 7.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,681
@725,673 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What if somebody said that they had "taken enough shit"? Would you think that they had literally had poo thrown at them, and had passed the threshold at which they tolerated it?
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It is okay when Trump does it, for he can do no wrong. Thanks.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,682
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
I would think that they literally went to a farm and grabbed manure and loaded it into a wheelbarrow until it was completely packed.
And I noticed that, thanks! When the evul dum lieberal media says something, it's wrong, even when it is genuinely correct.
Nonverbal joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 36 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,692
U.S. Politics. In the 1996 presidential debates, candidate Bob Dole averaged 147 blinks--seven times above normal. President Bill Clinton averaged 99 blinks a minute, reaching 117 when asked about increases in teen drug use, a sensitive issue of the day (Tecce 1996).
Metæ replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,708
@725,681 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx) @725,682 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Alright guys fasten your seatbelts cause I'm gonna blow your fucking mind.
Trump said Clinton "acid washed" her server. Clinton used a program called "BleachBit". I think we can all agree on this. NBC fact checkers agree on this. Okay, get ready. Acid washed jeans are not actually washed with acid but with bleach (sodium hypochlorite). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_washing#Acid-washed_jeans
So by saying Clinton "acid washed" her server Trump meant "washed with sodium hypochlorite" aka bleach. Why do you think they call it BleachBit?
Jubilee Starshine joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 25 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,716
@725,616 (Metæ)
well, tbh that's going to appeal to idiot voters on the left. i know it's the party of elitists and intellectuals and "scientists," but liberal idiots DO exist. same reason the right pushes ridiculous conspiracy theories, their idiots lap it up.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#725,744
@725,692 (Nonverbal)
it is important to measure the blink intervals. If the blink intervals have a very small standard deviation, then we have to suspect non-human or non-human influence.
@725,708 (Metæ)
aw fuck, acid wash jeans didn't even use real acid? fuckin things were even stupider than I thought
> It's metaphorical. Bleach (and acid) clean things in real life. So it's used to describe cleaning things digitally. Just like the "folder" I keep my reaction images in isn't actually a physical manila folder.
> > Biased! The polls are controlled by the crooked liberal media! Lock her up! MAGA! > > Huston we have a Problem. Several of the Polls are controlled by the Right Wing Nuts. Wall Street Journal is Owned by the Owner of Fox News. That means there are two of the Polls paid for by or by 50% from the Right Wing Nuts. > > I need to be fair and honest and balanced so and this is NO BS. The Fox Poll that currently angers Bill O'Rilley shows up as a poorly rated poll by 538.com IF you look at this >http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/?_r=3 > > You have to scroll wayyyy down on the 2nd list on this document. That Poll had Romney winning by to much and so much so that Fox fired that Polling company and hired one with a much better track record. > > NBC FOX Wall Street Journal does NOT do the actual Polling. That is contracted out to people in the business of just running Polls - Not just election which I bet is a small part of the usual business, > > Also notice that the majority of the Polls are Republican leaning and I have no clue why that is. I do no why the first debate Poll was heavy Democrat leaning because CNN explained why - CNN by the way as you can see from the list is a very highly rated Poll. This is also true going back to 2008 > >@725,616 (Metæ) > > > > Moderator read Trumps words and repeated them to Trump and asked him a question. Yesterday he says he never said those words- To many examples of this and at this point I do not think its always a lie - Just simple Alzheimer's > > I'm a bit skeptical about debate "fact checking" after NBC dropped this bombshell. I'm not sure if the NBC "fact" checkers are anti-Trump or just, like, literally mentally retarded but either way it tends to discredit them. > > > > http://www.nbcnews.com/card/trump-said-clinton-acid-washed-server-nope-n663436 > > OK LOL Discard the Fact Checkers. The Report I saw on CNN simply showed a clip of the debate with the ABC Gals question and then showed Trump on Monday calling it bogus and then showed Trump on tape answering that exact question and his words matched 100% the words that were read to him at the debate > > When I look at fact checking I use Politico because I do like the Pants on Fire ratings Trump gets and another sight I look at makes Trumps nose grow longer > > > > > he's going to grab the election by the pussy > > Yes and that Pussy has teeth and those Teeth are as in this image Teeth are in her Pussy I do recommend this movie and kook does as well
look you typed all your words like a normal human!
Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post[^][v]#835,446
Ever since the video I watch where he was asking for somebody in the room since he couldn't find him and that someone was sitting right next to him, have I been worried about his overall health. By the time eight years rolls around he's going to be broken and the oldest president to have ever served beating Ronald Reagan by one year, Trump would be 78 when he leaves office. I wonder if the only reason why he won't get the incumbent advantage is because he doesn't want to run again.
I think you were both correct. Fake Anon is right that a bunch of people were convinced she physically destroyed a server where emails were stored like a filing cabinet, and meta is right that claiming that "acid wash" is misleading because bleach is basic, not acidic, is splitting hairs.