Topic: Donald Trump on getting women: "Grab them by the pussy"
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY started this discussion 10 years ago #56,093
This is great! Video in the link.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html?_r=0
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #724,446
That must be embarrassing for him.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 17 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #724,448
buto joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #724,449
damn! I love how they take the conversation out of the bus with the "which one if us would you 'take on a date'" thing. that was all very unsettling. also did you notice how he didn't know how to open the door on the bus?? omg
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #724,450
I texted that number, what does it do?
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 11 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #724,451
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #724,452
It'll probably strengthen his support. Hillary will pretend to be upset about this but she's lying
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #724,454
Never failed me.
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #724,457
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,471
This, surely, will be the final straw that sinks him!
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,475
He's right.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,482
Oh come on you prudes are gonna feign outrage and moral indignation over this like Kennedy and Slick Willie never said anything disparaging about women?
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,484
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,485
@724,482 (Metæ)
> Oh come on you prudes are gonna feign outrage and moral indignation over this like Kennedy and Slick Willie never said anything disparaging about women?
I was thinking about it and yeah prolly most prezes talk nasty but this banter kind of crossed a line. he basically admitted to sexual assault
> Oh come on you prudes are gonna feign outrage and moral indignation over this like Kennedy and Slick Willie never said anything disparaging about women?
I was thinking about it and yeah prolly most prezes talk nasty but this banter kind of crossed a line. he basically admitted to sexual assault
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,486
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,487
@previous (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
> No he didn't
grabbing women by the pussy isn't sexual assault?? just kissing them is OK?????
> No he didn't
grabbing women by the pussy isn't sexual assault?? just kissing them is OK?????
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #724,488
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,489
I sometimes question rather or not Donald Trump is just a plot to get Hillary into office which maybe backfiring and can have bad results for the country.
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,490
Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,491
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,495
@724,485 (buto)
I watched the video and Trump was clearly saying that when you are rich and famous, women (at least a certain kind of woman) will throw themselves at you. He never said he did grab a woman's pussy, only that they would let him.
I watched the video and Trump was clearly saying that when you are rich and famous, women (at least a certain kind of woman) will throw themselves at you. He never said he did grab a woman's pussy, only that they would let him.
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,496
@previous (Metæ)
wow. he said that he throws himself at women and you read it the other way around? lol
wow. he said that he throws himself at women and you read it the other way around? lol
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,500
Didn't some video just get released of Clinton fondling a subordinate?
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,504
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,505
donald trump is a faggot retard and so are his supporters so honestly this is not surprising, he hates women (he loves dick btw)
Jubilee Starshine joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,508
@724,491 (Denmark guy !jJEom8Ii3E)
actually that's exactly what he said. to walk up to a woman and grab her by the pussy and kiss her without her consenting to that IS assault. he said he assaults women and gets away with it all the time because he's famous. bill cosby thinking, tbh.
makes me really wonder if he really DID rape a 13 year old
actually that's exactly what he said. to walk up to a woman and grab her by the pussy and kiss her without her consenting to that IS assault. he said he assaults women and gets away with it all the time because he's famous. bill cosby thinking, tbh.
makes me really wonder if he really DID rape a 13 year old
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,514
@724,482 (Metæ)
If you've got audio tape of Bill talking about grabbing women by their vaginas I'd love to hear it! You also neglected to mention that Washington owned slaves and hey this is not as bad as slavery so what's the big deal.
If you've got audio tape of Bill talking about grabbing women by their vaginas I'd love to hear it! You also neglected to mention that Washington owned slaves and hey this is not as bad as slavery so what's the big deal.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,516
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Hillary cut down the cherry tree, when she was asked about it she claimed no illegal activity had taken place and then deleted the email
Hillary cut down the cherry tree, when she was asked about it she claimed no illegal activity had taken place and then deleted the email
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,519
Anonymous N replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,521
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,524
@724,514 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
http://100percentfedup.com/bill-clinton-caught-groping-flight-attendant-on-plane-until-he-realized-camera-was-recording-him-video/ I have a video of him actually grabbing a vagina
http://100percentfedup.com/bill-clinton-caught-groping-flight-attendant-on-plane-until-he-realized-camera-was-recording-him-video/ I have a video of him actually grabbing a vagina
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,525
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 10 years ago, 29 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,526
@724,524 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Also I literally cannot make out anything in that video. There are about thirty pixels total.
Also I literally cannot make out anything in that video. There are about thirty pixels total.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,527
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,528
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
It looks like the inside of her thigh near her knee at worst, which unless she has a second vagina located right next to her knees, means he probably didn't grab her vagina.
It looks like the inside of her thigh near her knee at worst, which unless she has a second vagina located right next to her knees, means he probably didn't grab her vagina.
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,529
@724,514 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Clinton had the foresight to retire before personal recording devices became ubiquitous. But you know damn well Bill said some pretty deplorable stuff in his life.
What shocks me is that Trump actually admits to failing to seduce a woman!
Clinton had the foresight to retire before personal recording devices became ubiquitous. But you know damn well Bill said some pretty deplorable stuff in his life.
What shocks me is that Trump actually admits to failing to seduce a woman!
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,530
@previous (Metæ)
Would it surprise me? No. Is there any direct evidence that he did such a thing? No. Is he currently running for president? No. There is a difference between something a retired politician possibly could have said twenty years ago and something the current nominee of a major party said ten years ago and has "apologized" for by saying he was sorry that people were offended by it. Everyone in the Republican party is having a shit-fit right now and God does it feel good.
Would it surprise me? No. Is there any direct evidence that he did such a thing? No. Is he currently running for president? No. There is a difference between something a retired politician possibly could have said twenty years ago and something the current nominee of a major party said ten years ago and has "apologized" for by saying he was sorry that people were offended by it. Everyone in the Republican party is having a shit-fit right now and God does it feel good.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,533
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 43 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,540
why do people keep trying to make this election about bill clinton? it's like hillary is the one who's teflon. they can't even directly attack her. it's crazy.all donald trump's campaign can do is try and put him on even footing with bill, and yet they try to villanize hillary for staying with him and defending him? but the alternative is literally electing a womanizing analog for bill clinton? it's weird! it's like their saying, "yeah trump is a misogynistic piece of shit, but so is bill clinton and hillary is married to him! don't vote for hillary she loves womanizing misogynists!"
if it works i swear to god i'm going to go to mars
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 47 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,541
@724,530 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The point is that Bill Clinton's putting cigars inside interns and generally having trouble keeping his zipper up didn't stop him from being a good president.
The point is that Bill Clinton's putting cigars inside interns and generally having trouble keeping his zipper up didn't stop him from being a good president.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 59 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,542
@previous (Metæ)
we didn't know about that until after he was already president though. also, who says he was a good president? the republicans hated him and his impeachment was a national embarrassment. if we'd known before hand during his campaign that he was as bad as donald trump then he would not have been elected. not in 92, no fucking way. and it would've spared us a national sex scandal, smh
we didn't know about that until after he was already president though. also, who says he was a good president? the republicans hated him and his impeachment was a national embarrassment. if we'd known before hand during his campaign that he was as bad as donald trump then he would not have been elected. not in 92, no fucking way. and it would've spared us a national sex scandal, smh
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,544
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 2 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,545
@724,530 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
it does feel good, tbh. they are reaping the result of living in a conservative echo chamber for damn near 25 years. goes all the way back to rush limbaugh, but it's only gotten worse and worse over time. trump, or a candidate who represents the most fringe edge, is just the natural end result of insular thinking.
it does feel good, tbh. they are reaping the result of living in a conservative echo chamber for damn near 25 years. goes all the way back to rush limbaugh, but it's only gotten worse and worse over time. trump, or a candidate who represents the most fringe edge, is just the natural end result of insular thinking.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,546
@724,482 (Metæ)
Of course Meta has to come in here and defend Trump's ridiculous remarks yet again, somehow hoping to make Trump's idiocy okay by claiming that other politicians have said similar things.
Of course Meta has to come in here and defend Trump's ridiculous remarks yet again, somehow hoping to make Trump's idiocy okay by claiming that other politicians have said similar things.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 33 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,548
@724,542 (Jubilee Starshine)
I do think Bill Clinton is the best living politician (with FDR being the greatest ever).
Clinton's presidency had good economic growth, no major wars and I think 1993-2001 was a pretty nice time for America.
@previous (P)
Once again you guys are playing the game totally wrong. This is performance art, not politics. Politics stopped mattering a long time ago.
I do think Bill Clinton is the best living politician (with FDR being the greatest ever).
Clinton's presidency had good economic growth, no major wars and I think 1993-2001 was a pretty nice time for America.
@previous (P)
Once again you guys are playing the game totally wrong. This is performance art, not politics. Politics stopped mattering a long time ago.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous P replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,550
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 5 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,561
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,562
@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
If Trump had not said that back in 2005, but instead a video was released by the Trump campaign showing him taking his hat off for the lady, holding the door open for her, and just generally being chivalrous and respectful to women, would you switch your vote to Trump?
If Trump had not said that back in 2005, but instead a video was released by the Trump campaign showing him taking his hat off for the lady, holding the door open for her, and just generally being chivalrous and respectful to women, would you switch your vote to Trump?
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,563
What I do wonder, though, was this supposed to be the next debate "gotcha" (like Alicia Machado) but they had to drop it early to drown out the Podesta email leaks?
Clinton (and/or her people) has obviously been holding onto this for a while.
It also makes me sad there's been, like, no discussion on actual policy. It's just "omg trump said this horrible thing 10/20/30 years ago!!!"
Clinton (and/or her people) has obviously been holding onto this for a while.
It also makes me sad there's been, like, no discussion on actual policy. It's just "omg trump said this horrible thing 10/20/30 years ago!!!"
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 10 years ago, 23 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,566
@previous (Metæ)
Those leaked emails just prove once again what we already know about Hillary. Crooked as fuck.
Those leaked emails just prove once again what we already know about Hillary. Crooked as fuck.
Jubilee Starshine joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 58 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,568
@724,563 (Metæ)
actually he has discussed policy, he wants to give tax breaks to the wealthy, proliferate nuclear weapons, isolate ourselves from our trade partners, and that mexican thing.
there's a lot of other stuff, like his relationship and feelings toward putin, views on abortion - i mean his policy is just a total shit show.
actually he has discussed policy, he wants to give tax breaks to the wealthy, proliferate nuclear weapons, isolate ourselves from our trade partners, and that mexican thing.
there's a lot of other stuff, like his relationship and feelings toward putin, views on abortion - i mean his policy is just a total shit show.
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,580
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 48 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,581
@724,563 (Metæ)
The only person talking about policy is Clinton. Trump doesn't have any actual policies.
@724,562 (Metæ)
No, and to be honest I'm somewhat offended that this scandal is being made out to be the big thing that could end it for him. It's apparently fine to be hideous to blacks, Muslims, immigrants, but keep your goddamn hands off the white woman pussy, I guess. Very upsetting actually. This is nothing in my book.
The only person talking about policy is Clinton. Trump doesn't have any actual policies.
@724,562 (Metæ)
No, and to be honest I'm somewhat offended that this scandal is being made out to be the big thing that could end it for him. It's apparently fine to be hideous to blacks, Muslims, immigrants, but keep your goddamn hands off the white woman pussy, I guess. Very upsetting actually. This is nothing in my book.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,616
the US public wants someone in office who isn't afraid to just reach out and grab the world by the pussy
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,618
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 51 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,650
@724,581 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
What about his famous "ban all Muslims" policy? Or the "blow up Iranian boats" policy? And who could forget, the "build a wall and make Mexico pay" policy?
Donald is definitely a man with policies.
What about his famous "ban all Muslims" policy? Or the "blow up Iranian boats" policy? And who could forget, the "build a wall and make Mexico pay" policy?
Donald is definitely a man with policies.
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,788
Trump is in trouble now. Look who's condemned him over this.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #724,792
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,867
@724,788 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Very few men have any respect for women. Ever been messaged by a man looking for one thing??
Ugh. This is why I am choosing to become gay.
> Very few men have any respect for women. Ever been messaged by a man looking for one thing??
Ugh. This is why I am choosing to become gay.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,871
@724,788 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
lol. wow. trump actually responded...
> Oh, for god's sake! What's next?! Denouncement by the Black-and-White cookie?! DISASTER! @TicTacUSA
https://twitter.com/realDenaldTrump/status/784849993362530304
he's about to get into a rosie o'donnel style feud with a breath mint company isn't he...
lol. wow. trump actually responded...
> Oh, for god's sake! What's next?! Denouncement by the Black-and-White cookie?! DISASTER! @TicTacUSA
https://twitter.com/realDenaldTrump/status/784849993362530304
he's about to get into a rosie o'donnel style feud with a breath mint company isn't he...
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,874
@previous (Jubilee Starshine)
That's a parody account, though. Note the spelling in the @name. "Denald".
Although, I can still see Trump getting into a feud with TicTac.
That's a parody account, though. Note the spelling in the @name. "Denald".
Although, I can still see Trump getting into a feud with TicTac.
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,876
Grab life by the pussy.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,883
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,901
Oh, okay, so there is a reason that Tic Tac are weighing in on this. Trump mentions Tic Tacs somewhere in the whole pussy grabbing spiel.
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,903
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
yes, he said he would see a hot broad and he'd eat a tic tac and then go over and just grab her by the pussy and kiss her. sometimes he'd even offer them a tic tac too, and then grab them by the pussy and kiss her. he's a gentleman afterall, and no girl wants to be grabbed by the pussy and kissed by her boss if his breath stinks.
yes, he said he would see a hot broad and he'd eat a tic tac and then go over and just grab her by the pussy and kiss her. sometimes he'd even offer them a tic tac too, and then grab them by the pussy and kiss her. he's a gentleman afterall, and no girl wants to be grabbed by the pussy and kissed by her boss if his breath stinks.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,967
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #724,989
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,057
@724,541 (Metæ)> The point is that Bill Clinton's putting cigars inside interns and generally having trouble keeping his zipper up didn't stop him from being a good president.
Only tyme for one replay as I am off to the Little Italy Festival for the day
Monica let bill do that by consent and 4 all we no she asked him to put the Cigar there so as to well add Tang to the Tobacco leaf
Trump is bragging that as a Star he was Free to grab the women by the Pussy. Not consent - Wood could say more but I am so hungry and will have to wait in line for food when I get there - Hummmmmm there is a Cigar shop in Little Italy and I am meeting up with one EX-GF and there is One experience I have yet to try soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,058
@previous (Syntax)
> Not consent
He clearly said "they will let you" -- let you. And I do believe it. He's a world-famous billionaire. He likes sex with beautiful women. Beautiful women like sex with world famous billionaires. I'm sure women throw themselves at him constantly, for his money if nothing else.
> Not consent
He clearly said "they will let you" -- let you. And I do believe it. He's a world-famous billionaire. He likes sex with beautiful women. Beautiful women like sex with world famous billionaires. I'm sure women throw themselves at him constantly, for his money if nothing else.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,061
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,064
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Oh man i can start walking around shoving my hand in womens' crotches? Nice!! That's the America I want to live in.
Oh man i can start walking around shoving my hand in womens' crotches? Nice!! That's the America I want to live in.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,066
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You have to be an alpha male billionaire first. Otherwise you'll get maced.
@725,061 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I do too! I've heard 100x worse in rap music.
You have to be an alpha male billionaire first. Otherwise you'll get maced.
@725,061 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I do too! I've heard 100x worse in rap music.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,074
itt: wealthy celebrity is above reproach
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,075
@previous (Jubilee Starshine)
Do you seriously think that if you were a world famous billionaire, that you would have any trouble getting women in the sack?
Do you seriously think that if you were a world famous billionaire, that you would have any trouble getting women in the sack?
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,076
@previous (Metæ)these women apparently
http://qz.com/804486/the-women-whove-accused-donald-trump-of-sexual-assault/
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,077
@725,075 (Metæ)
He's probably not an actual billionaire though. It's why he won't release his tax returns.
He's probably not an actual billionaire though. It's why he won't release his tax returns.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,079
@previous (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
that and it shows how he targeted small businesses, doesn't pay them, then used that debt to double-dip on his taxes. he'd place huge orders for good or services, the contractors either do the work or indebt themselves with product and then struggle to collect partial payment months or years down the road. in the meantime some of these business fail and never end up collecting due to bankruptcy and not being able to afford lawsuits. others settle for partial payment and struggle to remain afloat. it's happened with laborers, piano suppliers, slot machine venders - pretty much any time he can use a small business, he does, and then he takes massive advantage of that business because they have far fewer resources to fight with.
http://fortune.com/2016/10/08/donald-trump-taxes-contractors/
that and it shows how he targeted small businesses, doesn't pay them, then used that debt to double-dip on his taxes. he'd place huge orders for good or services, the contractors either do the work or indebt themselves with product and then struggle to collect partial payment months or years down the road. in the meantime some of these business fail and never end up collecting due to bankruptcy and not being able to afford lawsuits. others settle for partial payment and struggle to remain afloat. it's happened with laborers, piano suppliers, slot machine venders - pretty much any time he can use a small business, he does, and then he takes massive advantage of that business because they have far fewer resources to fight with.
http://fortune.com/2016/10/08/donald-trump-taxes-contractors/
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,080
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,081
@725,077 (beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY)
Alright then hundred-millionaire. Whatever. The point is, he does have a lot of money. More money than like 99.999% of people.
@725,076 (Jubilee Starshine)
Bill Clinton's been accused of far worse.
Alright then hundred-millionaire. Whatever. The point is, he does have a lot of money. More money than like 99.999% of people.
@725,076 (Jubilee Starshine)
Bill Clinton's been accused of far worse.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,082
@725,074 (Jubilee Starshine)
He seems like how every other male politician to me. Most of them are child molestating, murderers.
He seems like how every other male politician to me. Most of them are child molestating, murderers.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,083
Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,084
@725,082 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I actually do find the Jeffrey Epstein connection troubling. The media would be all over it, but of course Slick Willie is involved also.
I actually do find the Jeffrey Epstein connection troubling. The media would be all over it, but of course Slick Willie is involved also.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,085
@725,081 (Metæ)
accused though, not convicted. those are different things, you know. bill clinton also denies it. by trumps own admission he sexually assaults women, and women are coming forward and describing exactly the kind of assault he admits to. innocent until presumed guilty, of course an admission goes a real long way. you know?
anyway bill isn't even running for anything. the election is between trump and hillary.
accused though, not convicted. those are different things, you know. bill clinton also denies it. by trumps own admission he sexually assaults women, and women are coming forward and describing exactly the kind of assault he admits to. innocent until presumed guilty, of course an admission goes a real long way. you know?
anyway bill isn't even running for anything. the election is between trump and hillary.
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,086
@725,058 (Metæ)
> > Not consent
> He clearly said "they will let you" -- let you. And I do believe it. He's a world-famous billionaire. He likes sex with beautiful women. Beautiful women like sex with world famous billionaires. I'm sure women throw themselves at him constantly, for his money if nothing else.
yeah ok
> > Not consent
> He clearly said "they will let you" -- let you. And I do believe it. He's a world-famous billionaire. He likes sex with beautiful women. Beautiful women like sex with world famous billionaires. I'm sure women throw themselves at him constantly, for his money if nothing else.
yeah ok
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,087
@725,085 (Jubilee Starshine)
The Trump thing is accusations, too. You can sue anyone for anything. Being sued isn't actually evidence of guilt.
The Trump thing is accusations, too. You can sue anyone for anything. Being sued isn't actually evidence of guilt.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,088
@725,084 (Metæ)
i was just reading about that this morning on r/politics. the media IS all over it. but, it's an allegation against trump so it's getting the attention is deserves. it could be completely unfounded - anyone can file a lawsuit. now if it turns into a conviction or it trump were to admit that he raped a 13 year old girl then it would be all over the place every minute of the day. kinda like the grabbing them by the pussy thing.
i was just reading about that this morning on r/politics. the media IS all over it. but, it's an allegation against trump so it's getting the attention is deserves. it could be completely unfounded - anyone can file a lawsuit. now if it turns into a conviction or it trump were to admit that he raped a 13 year old girl then it would be all over the place every minute of the day. kinda like the grabbing them by the pussy thing.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 8 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,089
@725,085 (Jubilee Starshine)
I think his connection to his wife is important, especially since she has said that he will handle certain aspects of being president. Also a video just came out of Bill Clinton sexual assaulting a women, literally grabbing her pussy. It doesn't really matter though, as all politicians are rapists.
I think his connection to his wife is important, especially since she has said that he will handle certain aspects of being president. Also a video just came out of Bill Clinton sexual assaulting a women, literally grabbing her pussy. It doesn't really matter though, as all politicians are rapists.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,090
@725,087 (Metæ)
he has admitted it on video and now the women are corroborating that it's true. that is different than some random person calling him a rapist
he has admitted it on video and now the women are corroborating that it's true. that is different than some random person calling him a rapist
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,092
Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,093
@725,086 (buto)
Now, buto, he's like I think the only person on the forum with actual documented proof of having successful relationships with women. His opinion carries considerable weight in this matter.
Now, buto, he's like I think the only person on the forum with actual documented proof of having successful relationships with women. His opinion carries considerable weight in this matter.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,094
@725,092 (Metæ)
then i guess we'll just have to see if he'll admit to it. like bill clinton. i guess neither one are rapists. he's rich and powerful, so he gets a free pass to fondle stewardesses, huh
then i guess we'll just have to see if he'll admit to it. like bill clinton. i guess neither one are rapists. he's rich and powerful, so he gets a free pass to fondle stewardesses, huh
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,095
@previous (Jubilee Starshine)
They are both rapists and so is Hillary probably. She's likely also killed a few people.
They are both rapists and so is Hillary probably. She's likely also killed a few people.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,096
@725,085 (Jubilee Starshine)
And yes I know Bill Clinton is not running. The argument you're making is that Trump's sex scandals make him unfit for the presidency.
I think Bill Clinton is proof that you can be a good president, even if you have trouble keeping your zipper up.
And yes I know Bill Clinton is not running. The argument you're making is that Trump's sex scandals make him unfit for the presidency.
I think Bill Clinton is proof that you can be a good president, even if you have trouble keeping your zipper up.
Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,097
@725,095 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What do you think is up with Hillary and Huma? You think they're like secret lesbians?
What do you think is up with Hillary and Huma? You think they're like secret lesbians?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,099
@previous (Metæ)
I definitely think Hillary is a lesbian and that her marriage to Bill has always been political. I had also assumed the she would run for president since Bills sex scandals. I could tell by how she reacted that they had made a deal.
I definitely think Hillary is a lesbian and that her marriage to Bill has always been political. I had also assumed the she would run for president since Bills sex scandals. I could tell by how she reacted that they had made a deal.
Jubilee Starshine replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,100
@725,096 (Metæ)
no, i'm arguing that it's yet one more reason to not vote for him. STOP BEING SO MYOPIC. you always want to try and reduce and generalize a single statement to encompass the breath of people's belief. it's not JUST the sex scandal, that's merely the icing on the cake. the actual bulk of the reasoning is everything combined. his shitty policy, his shitty personality, his shitty scandals - all of it combined makes him unfit. any one thing can be brushed off, but every day it's more and more and more reasons not to vote for the guy. it's never going to be just one thing, it's everything about the man.
no, i'm arguing that it's yet one more reason to not vote for him. STOP BEING SO MYOPIC. you always want to try and reduce and generalize a single statement to encompass the breath of people's belief. it's not JUST the sex scandal, that's merely the icing on the cake. the actual bulk of the reasoning is everything combined. his shitty policy, his shitty personality, his shitty scandals - all of it combined makes him unfit. any one thing can be brushed off, but every day it's more and more and more reasons not to vote for the guy. it's never going to be just one thing, it's everything about the man.
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,101
@previous (Jubilee Starshine)
but bill did it and therefore trump would also be a good president. right?
but bill did it and therefore trump would also be a good president. right?
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,102
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,103
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,104
I'm going to start thinking of funny write in candidates
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,106
Metæ double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,107
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,108
Anonymous P replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,111
Theresa May would never say anything like that.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,113
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,114
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,118
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,119
@previous (Metæ)
I really wish you weren't influenced by my posts. I know you look up to me as a hero, but you shouldn't. I am a loser. When you turn 18, I don't want you to imitate me.
I really wish you weren't influenced by my posts. I know you look up to me as a hero, but you shouldn't. I am a loser. When you turn 18, I don't want you to imitate me.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,120
@previous (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
lol where was that from again?
@725,118 (Metæ)
but our new life together!!
lol where was that from again?
@725,118 (Metæ)
but our new life together!!
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,121
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,122
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,123
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,124
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,126
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,127
@725,120 (buto)
> but our new life together!!
I know ninjj_in_a_dress.jpg is an old meme but will you wear one for the wedding?
> but our new life together!!
I know ninjj_in_a_dress.jpg is an old meme but will you wear one for the wedding?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,129
Theyve raised money to ship that child rape victim (whose abuser Hillary Defended) to the debates. Savage
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,130
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
--Juanita Broderick?-- oh wait I remember it now. The one where they have a tape of Hillary laughing about how she got the (alleged) rapist acquitted?
--Juanita Broderick?-- oh wait I remember it now. The one where they have a tape of Hillary laughing about how she got the (alleged) rapist acquitted?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,133
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,135
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Damn! Hillary wont be bothered, though. She might actually enjoy it and be energized by it.
Damn! Hillary wont be bothered, though. She might actually enjoy it and be energized by it.
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,136
@previous (Metæ)
She claimed in court that adolescent girls often fantasize about sex with older men and that the girl had instigated it and was bossy and pushy when she didn't get her way.
She claimed in court that adolescent girls often fantasize about sex with older men and that the girl had instigated it and was bossy and pushy when she didn't get her way.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,137
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,138
When is the debate? Today?
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,139
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,140
@725,138 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)Yep!
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Yes! Trump's campaign is damn entertaining though!
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,142
@725,136 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> She claimed in court that adolescent girls often fantasize about sex with older men and that the girl had instigated it and was bossy and pushy when she didn't get her way.
Mark thinks this is OK and what all lawyers should aspire to
> She claimed in court that adolescent girls often fantasize about sex with older men and that the girl had instigated it and was bossy and pushy when she didn't get her way.
Mark thinks this is OK and what all lawyers should aspire to
buto double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,143
@725,124 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
I was also dw in that draad
@725,127 (Metæ)
yeah but you have to pay for it and I get to pick it
I was also dw in that draad
@725,127 (Metæ)
yeah but you have to pay for it and I get to pick it
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,144
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,146
@previous (Metæ)
I forgot about that dress
somebody should post it I want to know what color I see today
I forgot about that dress
somebody should post it I want to know what color I see today
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,147
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,150
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,151
@725,147 (Sheila LaBoof)
The debate moderator is acting as Hillary's puppet, attacking Trump while Hillary looks on, smirking. The joke is that the debate moderator is supposed to be neutral.
The debate moderator is acting as Hillary's puppet, attacking Trump while Hillary looks on, smirking. The joke is that the debate moderator is supposed to be neutral.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,157
@previous (Metæ)
but I saw hillary in two places at once
it's like a start trek transporter accident
but I saw hillary in two places at once
it's like a start trek transporter accident
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 10 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #725,159
@725,142 (buto)
I think every lawyer should vigorously defend their client using every available tool permitted by the profession. Sometimes that entails making shitty arguments. I don't know what you think she should have done instead besides commit legal malpractice.
I think every lawyer should vigorously defend their client using every available tool permitted by the profession. Sometimes that entails making shitty arguments. I don't know what you think she should have done instead besides commit legal malpractice.
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #725,220
@725,150 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
> I'd imagine that being a lawyer could ruin you for life
if you don't have a conscience then you can just laugh it off
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
;-j
> I'd imagine that being a lawyer could ruin you for life
if you don't have a conscience then you can just laugh it off
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
;-j