Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#723,452
There is a difference between legally avoiding taxes and illegally evading them. Trump has done the former. To be honest it makes him smart, and it makes you look dim for not knowing this.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,453
He's actually the best one out of every other choice that the party offered this time around. The better question is how could anyone vote for that party, given the pile of shit that the average politician of that party is, ever since Newt Gingrich it's been quite a toilet full of shit.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,455
buto joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,456
ugh
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,459
Why have laws and loopholes of you can't use them?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,461
@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
That sounds like a line out of crooked Hillarys playbook
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,463
@723,459 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Squeegee never takes any tax deductions because he doesn't want to take advantage of the laws.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,466
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,468
@723,461 (G)
They are both crooked. Politicians are horrible people
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 10 years ago, 18 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#723,469
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,537
I want to tongue Trump's anus.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,538
@previous (buto)
If he pays you for it, will you declare it on your taxes?
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,541
@previous (Metæ)
Nope, it was a gift. Monetary gifts are non taxable up to $10,000.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,555
A reminder of how a low tax rate fucked up Romney during the last election
Mitt and Ann Romney paid just under $2 million in taxes on income -- virtually all from investments -of just under $14 million for 2011,
an effective tax rate of 14.1%. This is a low tax rate, lower than the typical middle-class American worker pays, especially when one considers payroll taxes, the largest burden for most Americans.
It should concern us that individuals of Romney's wealth - analysis has put his personal fortune as high as $250 million, not counting some $100 million in trusts set up for his five children - pay so little as a percent in taxes.
0 tax to IRS year after year after year ALL Legal? One wonders why IRS continues to Audit - after all they expect a return on the investment
Real bottom line is that Trump has had a very bad week and none of this new stuff makes him look good - Next some great sex stuff should blow back Trumps way when he attempts to use sex again Hillary
(Edited 48 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,556
@previous (Syntax)
Look at it this way: the IRS has the authority to prosecute tax evasion, and they also have Trump's tax returns. They have not prosecuted Trump for tax evasion. That means either 1) he paid all the taxes he owes or 2) he is too powerful for the IRS to challenge.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 20 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,562
behold the power of Scientology
Syntax replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,577
@723,556 (Metæ)
Having been through a few audits with IRS - They were totally professional EXCEPT for one Asshole on the Phone with threats to freeze my bank accounts. One advantage of all that dancing I do is the variety of people with different careers. I jitterbug dance with a High Mucky muck gal - She sets up high level stings for IRS. Really expensive operations - Fake companies even in foreign countries to trap bad American's cheating on tax's. She gave me the low down that really is no different than any other business.
You see an opportunity to make money and you need people to do that and the overhead cost. So Audits have to end up with a high chance of return on investment. Trump says he gets audited every years for Decades?
Must be one hell of a team of agents studying his business practices. I have even more experience with Public Auditing/Accounting companies.
One thing I am sure of. If its true he is under audit? Its so easy to slow down the process on his end and draw it out - Could even b that he is the one that leaked that 1995 return in order to get all he wants out OUT -
On the other hand who wants to admit loss of One Billion and still get called a top notch businessman.
On the other hand I have been close to a loss much larger than THAT On Paper and covered by IRS - Clean and Clear - Real Money written OFF - Yet I can argue there has been so much profit in that failed Venture -
I can think of a few others - Failed - Written Off - Assets owned worth EVEN More than all the investment - So you get all your money back and the tax deduction and IRS stays happy - Stock holders ultra happy - Employees super happy re Stock Options shot up
Public however hummmmmmm need to think about this
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 9 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,598
@723,452 (B)
There is a difference between legally operating a private email server and illegally breaking into them. Clinton has done the former. To be honest it makes her smart, and it makes you look dim for not knowing this.
Anonymous H replied with this 10 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,614
> I jitterbug dance with a High Mucky muck gal - She sets up high level stings for IRS. Really expensive operations - Fake companies even in foreign countries to trap bad American's cheating on tax's. She gave me the low down that really is no different than any other business.
Cool story bro.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#723,621
> There is a difference between legally operating a private email server and illegally breaking into them. Clinton has done the former. To be honest it makes her smart, and it makes you look dim for not knowing this.
When did I say I didn't know that? Hillary should be in jail. What does that have to do with understanding the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion?
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#723,626
@previous (B)
When did I say I didn't know that? Donald should be in jail. What does that have to do with understanding the difference between running a private email server and breaking into a private email server?
Anonymous B replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#723,628