Topic: Do I want this Sephora eye collection?
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY started this discussion 10 years ago #55,487
Pls answer urgently.http://www.sephora.com/extravagant-eyes-P412513
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes. | 5 | 45% | |
| Yes, but not for $42. (Shipping is free and I have a gift card with $25 left.) | 3 | 27% | |
| No. | 3 | 27% |
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #717,909
> using makeup
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 21 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,910
How can they call it an "eye collection" when it doesn't even include eyes??
シェン joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,911
use the gift card
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,912
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 17 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,919
@717,910 (Metæ)
yeah, I thought there were going to be eyes, maybe a Japanese set of anmime eyes or some shit because Sephora sounds Japanese
yeah, I thought there were going to be eyes, maybe a Japanese set of anmime eyes or some shit because Sephora sounds Japanese
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,920
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
> Sephora sounds Japanese
Not quite. The "ph" sound doesn't exist in Japanese.
Not that a Japanese company couldn't use that name in English, mind you.
> Sephora sounds Japanese
Not quite. The "ph" sound doesn't exist in Japanese.
Not that a Japanese company couldn't use that name in English, mind you.
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,921
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,927
@previous (Metæ)
Nearly. The closest individual character they have is "fu". Which they could use (in combination with vowels, if needed) to approximate any variants of "f" or "ph" sounds from other languages.
Nearly. The closest individual character they have is "fu". Which they could use (in combination with vowels, if needed) to approximate any variants of "f" or "ph" sounds from other languages.
FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,929
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,932
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Waifu is a funny word. It's how the English word "wife" gets imported into the Japanese language. But after that, it came back into English with a very different meaning. Like some sort of linguistic tennis.
@OP
Yes. Buy buy buy!
Waifu is a funny word. It's how the English word "wife" gets imported into the Japanese language. But after that, it came back into English with a very different meaning. Like some sort of linguistic tennis.
@OP
Yes. Buy buy buy!
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,933
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,935
@717,920 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
None of the letters are Japanese letters either -- we can safely assume that the word is an approximation for non-Japanese since the letters aren't Japanese regardless. For instance, there's no English r sound in Japanese but we can assume the similar tongue flap Japanse sound.
None of the letters are Japanese letters either -- we can safely assume that the word is an approximation for non-Japanese since the letters aren't Japanese regardless. For instance, there's no English r sound in Japanese but we can assume the similar tongue flap Japanse sound.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Metæ replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,937
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,939
@717,933 (Metæ)
Google translate has it as "Sefora". Although, the actual Japanese letters for that spell out "Sefuora", which is close enough anyway.
@717,935 (Sheila LaBoof)
I don't think that Japan is actually involved. Apparently, Sephora is a French company.
Although, the fact that Google Translate has a translation might mean they have a presence in Japan.
Google translate has it as "Sefora". Although, the actual Japanese letters for that spell out "Sefuora", which is close enough anyway.
@717,935 (Sheila LaBoof)
I don't think that Japan is actually involved. Apparently, Sephora is a French company.
Although, the fact that Google Translate has a translation might mean they have a presence in Japan.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,941
@717,932 (RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Like some sort of linguistic tennis.
I like this phrase and may steal it in the near future to describe other instances where a word has bounced around and changed meanings.
> Like some sort of linguistic tennis.
I like this phrase and may steal it in the near future to describe other instances where a word has bounced around and changed meanings.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,945
I'm curious, how did the company come up with the name Sephora anyhow? Does it derive from anything, or was it completely invented, like how Kodak was just invented with the purpose of sounding futuristic but doesn't mean anything otherwise other than naming the company.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,967
Important update
It has been ordered.
Thanks.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,970
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 27 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,982
@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Yes, that one was a deciding factor. I am a big fan of purple eyeshadows so I was already disposed to this set, and Marc Jacobs mascara is hands-down the best volumizing mascara on the market right now (out of some 20 or so I've tried). But add the liquid glitter eyeliner and I can't say no. I do already have the Nars eyeshadow so I'll probably give that away, as well as the false eyelashes. Still a great deal.
Yes, that one was a deciding factor. I am a big fan of purple eyeshadows so I was already disposed to this set, and Marc Jacobs mascara is hands-down the best volumizing mascara on the market right now (out of some 20 or so I've tried). But add the liquid glitter eyeliner and I can't say no. I do already have the Nars eyeshadow so I'll probably give that away, as well as the false eyelashes. Still a great deal.
dw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,984
more autistic than a fucking minecraft collectible. thanks.
chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 10 years ago, 49 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,994
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #719,066
Update:
The cream eyeshadows are way too dark (more of a punched-in-the-eye grey color than a purple) and the liquid glitter eyeliner is freakishly glittery from a huge distance. The other items don't save it because the mascara is smaller than expected (and I already have one though it is starting to dry out), and I already have the powder eyeshadow and no one needs another black eyeliner. Also I don't wear false eyelashes.
I'm not sure what I expected from a kit called "extravagant eyes" but this is too extravagant. I shall be sending the kit back. Thanks.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
buto replied with this 10 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #719,096
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #719,158
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #719,160
Just get kylie's kits
squeegee joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #719,183
fake eyelashes AND glitter eyeliner? i would fist a midget for that kit. plus i love how slutty purple eyeshadow makes me look