Topic: If you support rape prevention then you support rape.
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #55,428
kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 19 minutes later[^] [v] #717,280
While thats kind of true, its also how life works
Svet !KOEYhArekw joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #717,281
Yet again men are demonised by the feminists.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,291
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #717,311
If you don't advise precautions against getting raped, then you are an accomplice to the rape that would happen to the person you are not advising. I think these "rape culture" style of feminist/SJW are trying to get more girls raped so that there will be more bitter, angry, damaged girls to join their bitch team. Misery loves company.
Metæ joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,356
Isn't this true for any crime though?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,362
@717,311 (Sheila LaBoof)
Ah the good old "switch the train" approach. I disagree. Not advising anyone to avoid rape is the morally correct option, because an evil arising from your lack of action is a magnitude less than an evil arising from your action.
Preventing a rapist from raping your friend by preventative measures means that the girl he does target instead is targeted because of your actions. Therefore, you have a moral blame for the attack of that girl.
By doing nothing to prevent the rapists, you have responsibility over none of the events. It's better to let someone be raped than cause someone to be raped.
Ah the good old "switch the train" approach. I disagree. Not advising anyone to avoid rape is the morally correct option, because an evil arising from your lack of action is a magnitude less than an evil arising from your action.
Preventing a rapist from raping your friend by preventative measures means that the girl he does target instead is targeted because of your actions. Therefore, you have a moral blame for the attack of that girl.
By doing nothing to prevent the rapists, you have responsibility over none of the events. It's better to let someone be raped than cause someone to be raped.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 25 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,363
Don't tell me to lock my doors, instead just stop all theft from happening. We need to teach "don't steal" and then everyone can leave everything unlocked. Locks are promoting theft culture.more positive 大威徳 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 37 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,387
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,479
@717,362 (F)
If everyone took the advice, then the targets would be too difficult for many would-be rapists to succeed. There isn't necessarily a second potential victim occupying the same easy space that the first one avoided.
If everyone took the advice, then the targets would be too difficult for many would-be rapists to succeed. There isn't necessarily a second potential victim occupying the same easy space that the first one avoided.
Anonymous F replied with this 10 years ago, 8 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,556
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
In an ideal world, sure, but we don't live in one. It's Schrodinger's sex crime, and so it only makes sense to assume that both outcomes will come true. In this case, one is forced to conclude that enabling the rape is morally equivalent to causing the rape.
In an ideal world, sure, but we don't live in one. It's Schrodinger's sex crime, and so it only makes sense to assume that both outcomes will come true. In this case, one is forced to conclude that enabling the rape is morally equivalent to causing the rape.
明王 replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,617
also your headline is misleading. they (i too) dont take issue with 'rape prevention' but rape prevention that focuses on changing women's behavior rather than... rapists behavior. which is basically excusing rapists/accepting that men rape, like, a lot, as a fact-of-life kind of thing. isnt that reasonable? and dont strawman me for saying this but thats part of rape culture. what it is. i will acknowledge that women/people probably could, in a very very small capacity, prevent FEW rapes by modifying their behavior (just to try to level with you), but when you ascribe to that line of thought you are acknowledging that women ARE prey. to men. for rape.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
明王 double-posted this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,619
@717,311 (Sheila LaBoof)
> If you don't advise precautions against getting raped, then you are an accomplice to the rape that would happen to the person you are not advising. I think these "rape culture" style of feminist/SJW are trying to get more girls raped so that there will be more bitter, angry, damaged girls to join their bitch team. Misery loves company.
thats fucked up and borderline insane
> If you don't advise precautions against getting raped, then you are an accomplice to the rape that would happen to the person you are not advising. I think these "rape culture" style of feminist/SJW are trying to get more girls raped so that there will be more bitter, angry, damaged girls to join their bitch team. Misery loves company.
thats fucked up and borderline insane
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,655
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,656
@717,617 (明王)
they are prey to the specific men that are rapists, who have a habit of looking for blackout drunk vagina
they are prey to the specific men that are rapists, who have a habit of looking for blackout drunk vagina
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 39 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #717,667
@717,617 (明王)
> rape prevention that focuses on changing women's behavior rather than... rapists behavior. which is basically excusing rapists/accepting that men rape
It's a good thing those methods aren't mutually exclusive, then.
> rape prevention that focuses on changing women's behavior rather than... rapists behavior. which is basically excusing rapists/accepting that men rape
It's a good thing those methods aren't mutually exclusive, then.
明王 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #717,725
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #717,730
less positive 明王 replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #717,737
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #717,740
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #717,742
RWBY Rhubarb? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #717,743
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #717,744
Yowsa it's like that Cell lizard guy in that Draganoballs