Topic: Is Dave from Russia secretly in love with FuckAlms?
Anonymous A started this discussion 10 years ago #55,367
I think he might be.
悟 joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #716,371
they should meet on top of the Emprire State Bluilding on Valentines day
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,383
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,407
I'm not 'Dave from Russia' (but genuinely whatever on that) but I am the guy who made the other thead, so to post here what I posted there -
It's a question that would only need to be asked once if Fuckalms would stop dodging it and address it.
Posting very cruel images of Matt's dead relatives and also posting about how "niggers" should be killed = fine to Fuckalms. Free speech, "if you don't like it block it", etc.
Whereas posting literally ONE message laughing at Louie who made those posts = banned by Fuckalms. Hundreds and hundreds of pictures of dead black people is an awesome expression of freedom of speech to Fuckalms, but when the person who posted those pictures makes the mistake of posting a photo of his own shitty apartment and I laugh at it and question his 'superiority' over blacks, that's stretching freedom of speech a little too much for Fuckalms.
Again, Fuckalms can get his 2 TC anons to divert the theme all he wants, but he is a fucking hypocrite and every board he moderates becomes a fucking wasteland as a result of that. He thinks the purpose of a message board is to establish his own small and secure clique of sycophants and anyone who dares threaten that gets banned.
It's a question that would only need to be asked once if Fuckalms would stop dodging it and address it.
Posting very cruel images of Matt's dead relatives and also posting about how "niggers" should be killed = fine to Fuckalms. Free speech, "if you don't like it block it", etc.
Whereas posting literally ONE message laughing at Louie who made those posts = banned by Fuckalms. Hundreds and hundreds of pictures of dead black people is an awesome expression of freedom of speech to Fuckalms, but when the person who posted those pictures makes the mistake of posting a photo of his own shitty apartment and I laugh at it and question his 'superiority' over blacks, that's stretching freedom of speech a little too much for Fuckalms.
Again, Fuckalms can get his 2 TC anons to divert the theme all he wants, but he is a fucking hypocrite and every board he moderates becomes a fucking wasteland as a result of that. He thinks the purpose of a message board is to establish his own small and secure clique of sycophants and anyone who dares threaten that gets banned.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,410
@previous (D)You didn't post "literally ONE message" you are an obsessed retard who has lost the object of his affection the doctor, and have just picked up fuckalms as your next obsession because your ass got banned for constant pedo shit.
Keep dropping those uids bud
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,411
@previous (E)
Those are not my posts and I'm not 'dropping uids', I have never once done that, and the mods of this site can verify that.
Yet again a TC anon comes swinging in on his vine to divert the question away from Fuckalms.
(that's another Fuckalms trick I love by the way - any 'Anon' who criticizes him = "the opinions of anons are worthless", but when an 'Anon' helps him out it's a case of "Lol, I know right, he's mad...")
Those are not my posts and I'm not 'dropping uids', I have never once done that, and the mods of this site can verify that.
Yet again a TC anon comes swinging in on his vine to divert the question away from Fuckalms.
(that's another Fuckalms trick I love by the way - any 'Anon' who criticizes him = "the opinions of anons are worthless", but when an 'Anon' helps him out it's a case of "Lol, I know right, he's mad...")
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 4 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,435
@716,407 (D)
Do you really care this much about moderation on an obscure board visited by 8 people total?
Do you really care this much about moderation on an obscure board visited by 8 people total?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,445
@previous (F)
No, I 'care' (loose word but it'll serve) about Fuckalms' hypocrisy. He loves to use the 'freedom of speech' defense when justifying why he allows those images of Matt's relatives or pictures of black corpses swinging from trees, but if you ever dare laugh at him or his tiny loyal clique of sycophants, you're banned. For a site set up to laugh at Kimmo Alm he sure has turned himself into him.
If anything 'annoys' me (again, loose descriptor) it's the fucking act he pulls on here, I mean MC. He and his 1 or 2 anon knights, who drop uids like motherfuckers when they back him up, trash this place mercilessly over on TC yet when he has no users he comes over here and drags his little army of white nights with him. Fuck him and fuck his two-faced smarmy little act.
What will inevitably happen now of course is that one of his anon pals will come and deflect this all away from him yet again. Then they will make 1 or 2 new threads about 'dave' to make it appear like it's Fuckalms' critics who are clogging up the board with this shit.
No, I 'care' (loose word but it'll serve) about Fuckalms' hypocrisy. He loves to use the 'freedom of speech' defense when justifying why he allows those images of Matt's relatives or pictures of black corpses swinging from trees, but if you ever dare laugh at him or his tiny loyal clique of sycophants, you're banned. For a site set up to laugh at Kimmo Alm he sure has turned himself into him.
If anything 'annoys' me (again, loose descriptor) it's the fucking act he pulls on here, I mean MC. He and his 1 or 2 anon knights, who drop uids like motherfuckers when they back him up, trash this place mercilessly over on TC yet when he has no users he comes over here and drags his little army of white nights with him. Fuck him and fuck his two-faced smarmy little act.
What will inevitably happen now of course is that one of his anon pals will come and deflect this all away from him yet again. Then they will make 1 or 2 new threads about 'dave' to make it appear like it's Fuckalms' critics who are clogging up the board with this shit.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,447
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,448
@716,445 (D)
> He and his 1 or 2 anon knights, who drop uids like motherfuckers
Have you considered that your personality and behaviour is simply attracting lots of critics?
> He and his 1 or 2 anon knights, who drop uids like motherfuckers
Have you considered that your personality and behaviour is simply attracting lots of critics?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 13 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,459
@previous (G)
> Have you considered that your personality and behaviour is simply attracting lots of critics?
See...
@716,445 (D)
> What will inevitably happen now of course is that one of his anon pals will come and deflect this all away from him yet again.
> Have you considered that your personality and behaviour is simply attracting lots of critics?
See...
@716,445 (D)
> What will inevitably happen now of course is that one of his anon pals will come and deflect this all away from him yet again.
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,460
@previous (D)
I didn't think so.
So you're saying you think that most Minichan and Tinychan users have a neutral or positive opinion of you? Please answer directly, without evading the question. Thank you.
I didn't think so.
So you're saying you think that most Minichan and Tinychan users have a neutral or positive opinion of you? Please answer directly, without evading the question. Thank you.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,461
@previous (G)
> I didn't think so.
>
> So you're saying you think that most Minichan and Tinychan users have a neutral or positive opinion of you? Please answer directly, without evading the question. Thank you.
I don't know or care what they think. My ego isn't that fragile that I concern myself with what strangers on internet sites think about me.
So I answered yours, now you answer mine: what is your opinion of the scenario I outlined above, about Fuckalms allowing endless threads with cruel pictures of Matt's dead relatives, and also threads about "niggers" because they're examples of 'free speech', but he bans people who laugh at the people who make those threads? Please answer directly, without evading the question. Thank you.
> I didn't think so.
>
> So you're saying you think that most Minichan and Tinychan users have a neutral or positive opinion of you? Please answer directly, without evading the question. Thank you.
I don't know or care what they think. My ego isn't that fragile that I concern myself with what strangers on internet sites think about me.
So I answered yours, now you answer mine: what is your opinion of the scenario I outlined above, about Fuckalms allowing endless threads with cruel pictures of Matt's dead relatives, and also threads about "niggers" because they're examples of 'free speech', but he bans people who laugh at the people who make those threads? Please answer directly, without evading the question. Thank you.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,466
@previous (D)
That was sort of an evasion. You're saying that your critics are, at most, two anons rapidly dropping UIDs to look like lots of people. But you don't concede the possibility that that many people genuinely have a negative opinion of your behaviour. How convenient...
I actually don't think that those topics reflect well on Tinychan, and should probably be removed if they are getting too excessive. Still, FuckAlms (and the rest of the Tinychan staff) are ultimately the ones who decide that, and it's not like I ever go to Tinychan anyway.
That was sort of an evasion. You're saying that your critics are, at most, two anons rapidly dropping UIDs to look like lots of people. But you don't concede the possibility that that many people genuinely have a negative opinion of your behaviour. How convenient...
I actually don't think that those topics reflect well on Tinychan, and should probably be removed if they are getting too excessive. Still, FuckAlms (and the rest of the Tinychan staff) are ultimately the ones who decide that, and it's not like I ever go to Tinychan anyway.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY joined in and replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,468
dongs
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,473
@716,466 (G)
> That was sort of an evasion. You're saying that your critics are, at most, two anons rapidly dropping UIDs to look like lots of people. But you don't concede the possibility that that many people genuinely have a negative opinion of your behaviour. How convenient...
I concede that possibility. I have never not done that. For all I know, or care, everyone on the internet may think I'm a cunt.
> I actually don't think that those topics reflect well on Tinychan, and should probably be removed if they are getting too excessive. Still, FuckAlms (and the rest of the Tinychan staff) are ultimately the ones who decide that, and it's not like I ever go to Tinychan anyway.
You've evaded the question, so I will recall you to it: I didn't ask your personal opinion of those topics on Tinychan, I asked your opinion of Fuckalms allowing endless threads with cruel pictures of Matt's dead relatives, and also threads about "niggers" because they're examples of 'free speech', but he bans people who laugh at the people who make those threads.
Please stop evading and answer directly. Thank you.
> That was sort of an evasion. You're saying that your critics are, at most, two anons rapidly dropping UIDs to look like lots of people. But you don't concede the possibility that that many people genuinely have a negative opinion of your behaviour. How convenient...
I concede that possibility. I have never not done that. For all I know, or care, everyone on the internet may think I'm a cunt.
> I actually don't think that those topics reflect well on Tinychan, and should probably be removed if they are getting too excessive. Still, FuckAlms (and the rest of the Tinychan staff) are ultimately the ones who decide that, and it's not like I ever go to Tinychan anyway.
You've evaded the question, so I will recall you to it: I didn't ask your personal opinion of those topics on Tinychan, I asked your opinion of Fuckalms allowing endless threads with cruel pictures of Matt's dead relatives, and also threads about "niggers" because they're examples of 'free speech', but he bans people who laugh at the people who make those threads.
Please stop evading and answer directly. Thank you.
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,475
@previous (D)
I think allowing those topics is a misstep. If the Tinychan staff are really banning people who are just criticising those posts, then that is also a misstep.
However, it is possible that the person or people criticising those threads are known troublemakers, in which case I could somewhat understand Tinychan staff taking action against them.
I think allowing those topics is a misstep. If the Tinychan staff are really banning people who are just criticising those posts, then that is also a misstep.
However, it is possible that the person or people criticising those threads are known troublemakers, in which case I could somewhat understand Tinychan staff taking action against them.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 12 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,477
@previous (G)
> I think allowing those topics is a misstep. If the Tinychan staff are really banning people who are just criticising those posts, then that is also a misstep.
Finally a candid answer. Still slyly diplomatic of course ("a misstep" is I suppose one way of describing the relishing of the constant mockery of dead people who had nothing at all to do with Matt's antics, and the endless posting of threads about "niggers"), but still, I sympathize with your difficult task here of having to seem fair and balanced whle also making sure you don't come across too critical of Fuckalms (I love how you keep on deflecting my question to "the Tinychan staff" when I'm talking only about Fuckalms. You simply can't bring yourself to use his name can you, you are doing everything to divert this away from him. I have never had a single problem with On or any other mod on there, so stop bringing them into it. This is about Fuckalms, you know it is, so stop trying to cover for him and make it about TC)
> However, it is possible that the person or people criticising those threads are known troublemakers, in which case I could somewhat understand Tinychan staff taking action against them.
Known troublemakers, eh? Incessant spamming of very cruel pictures of Matt's dead relatives = "great stuff, guys!" Louie making 5 threads a day writing about how "niggers' should be killed = "awesome Louie, you're so funny m8!" Objecting to those things by laughing at those who do it = "troublemakers!"
> I think allowing those topics is a misstep. If the Tinychan staff are really banning people who are just criticising those posts, then that is also a misstep.
Finally a candid answer. Still slyly diplomatic of course ("a misstep" is I suppose one way of describing the relishing of the constant mockery of dead people who had nothing at all to do with Matt's antics, and the endless posting of threads about "niggers"), but still, I sympathize with your difficult task here of having to seem fair and balanced whle also making sure you don't come across too critical of Fuckalms (I love how you keep on deflecting my question to "the Tinychan staff" when I'm talking only about Fuckalms. You simply can't bring yourself to use his name can you, you are doing everything to divert this away from him. I have never had a single problem with On or any other mod on there, so stop bringing them into it. This is about Fuckalms, you know it is, so stop trying to cover for him and make it about TC)
> However, it is possible that the person or people criticising those threads are known troublemakers, in which case I could somewhat understand Tinychan staff taking action against them.
Known troublemakers, eh? Incessant spamming of very cruel pictures of Matt's dead relatives = "great stuff, guys!" Louie making 5 threads a day writing about how "niggers' should be killed = "awesome Louie, you're so funny m8!" Objecting to those things by laughing at those who do it = "troublemakers!"
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 24 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,486
@previous (D)
I don't need FuckAlms to have a positive opinion of me, though. As I don't use Tinychan, he has no kind of power over my BBS posts. So I'm not speaking with any obligation to not offend FuckAlms. I am not sure where you got that impression from.
And yes, I am specifically using the term "Tinychan staff". Unless you know for sure that FuckAlms is acting alone in moderating these posts, it would be inaccurate to attribute these actions to just him.
Moving on, yes, there are persons, believe it or not, who have been hassling FuckAlms for over two years. Often attempting to spread inaccurate rumours about him, or insulting him repeatedly. So I find it understandable that he and the Tinychan staff would react differently to certain posters.
I don't need FuckAlms to have a positive opinion of me, though. As I don't use Tinychan, he has no kind of power over my BBS posts. So I'm not speaking with any obligation to not offend FuckAlms. I am not sure where you got that impression from.
And yes, I am specifically using the term "Tinychan staff". Unless you know for sure that FuckAlms is acting alone in moderating these posts, it would be inaccurate to attribute these actions to just him.
Moving on, yes, there are persons, believe it or not, who have been hassling FuckAlms for over two years. Often attempting to spread inaccurate rumours about him, or insulting him repeatedly. So I find it understandable that he and the Tinychan staff would react differently to certain posters.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,488
@previous (G)
> Moving on, yes, there are persons, believe it or not, who have been hassling FuckAlms for over two years. Often attempting to spread inaccurate rumours about him, or insulting him repeatedly. So I find it understandable that he and the Tinychan staff would react differently to certain posters.
You're giving yourself away here, you need to work harder on this act. Exchanges like this reach a resolution only when each side is being honest. First you say you "never go to Tinychan" and yet now you apparently have a remarkably thorough and detailed knowledge of all the people who have been, and I quote, "hassling Fuckalms for over two years" and "looking to spread inaccurate rumours about him" (question - how do you know they're "inaccurate"?)
Quit bullshitting, ok?
> Moving on, yes, there are persons, believe it or not, who have been hassling FuckAlms for over two years. Often attempting to spread inaccurate rumours about him, or insulting him repeatedly. So I find it understandable that he and the Tinychan staff would react differently to certain posters.
You're giving yourself away here, you need to work harder on this act. Exchanges like this reach a resolution only when each side is being honest. First you say you "never go to Tinychan" and yet now you apparently have a remarkably thorough and detailed knowledge of all the people who have been, and I quote, "hassling Fuckalms for over two years" and "looking to spread inaccurate rumours about him" (question - how do you know they're "inaccurate"?)
Quit bullshitting, ok?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,490
@previous (D)
To clarify, I did previously visit Tinychan on a regular basis, but have not for quite some time. So I have a good idea about the history of this matter.
Additionally, FuckAlms himself has explained this matter here on Minichan too.
To clarify, I did previously visit Tinychan on a regular basis, but have not for quite some time. So I have a good idea about the history of this matter.
Additionally, FuckAlms himself has explained this matter here on Minichan too.
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,511
@previous (G)
> To clarify, I did previously visit Tinychan on a regular basis, but have not for quite some time. So I have a good idea about the history of this matter.
Again, just stop bullshitting ok? The more you do it the deeper the hole you dig for yourself. First you say you "never go there" and that's why you're unfamiliar with specifically Fuckalms' role in all this, but now you say you "previously went there on a regular basis" and that's why you're clued up on every aspect of this?
Incidental question (because it'll be fun watching how you worm out of it) - why did you suddenly go from visiting there often to never going there ever again? And yet you still continue to keep notes on everything Fuckalms writes here? Why the odd boycott of Tinychan? Could it be you're lying out of your ass and you do in fact go there every day and post in the exact same style you're posting here now?
Again - please stop bullshitting. If you want to suck his dick, no problem, but be consistent.
> To clarify, I did previously visit Tinychan on a regular basis, but have not for quite some time. So I have a good idea about the history of this matter.
Again, just stop bullshitting ok? The more you do it the deeper the hole you dig for yourself. First you say you "never go there" and that's why you're unfamiliar with specifically Fuckalms' role in all this, but now you say you "previously went there on a regular basis" and that's why you're clued up on every aspect of this?
Incidental question (because it'll be fun watching how you worm out of it) - why did you suddenly go from visiting there often to never going there ever again? And yet you still continue to keep notes on everything Fuckalms writes here? Why the odd boycott of Tinychan? Could it be you're lying out of your ass and you do in fact go there every day and post in the exact same style you're posting here now?
Again - please stop bullshitting. If you want to suck his dick, no problem, but be consistent.
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 16 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,516
@previous (D)
Okay, to put it in the clearest terms: I used to regularly visit Tinychan, around two years ago. I then stopped visiting it, to the point that, presently, I never go there. There wasn't a special reason for that, I had just lost interest in the site, not being as close to the people there and not finding the topics as interesting as they were.
I assure you, I really do never go there anymore.
Now, I have a question for you. Throughout this conversation, you've asserted that I have some special loyalty or dedication to FuckAlms. As if I'm invested in protecting his reputation or something. I'm really not. Sure, I don't have any problem with him, but I'm by no means close to him either. Not only that, but you also think that there are other anons dedicated to defending him, to the point where they regularly drop UIDs to help defend his reputation.
I want a straight answer, to this: why do you think that FuckAlms has a small band of anonymous, loyal followers? Do you think that FuckAlms is very charismatic, or is bribing them somehow? Why do you think that these people exist?
Okay, to put it in the clearest terms: I used to regularly visit Tinychan, around two years ago. I then stopped visiting it, to the point that, presently, I never go there. There wasn't a special reason for that, I had just lost interest in the site, not being as close to the people there and not finding the topics as interesting as they were.
I assure you, I really do never go there anymore.
Now, I have a question for you. Throughout this conversation, you've asserted that I have some special loyalty or dedication to FuckAlms. As if I'm invested in protecting his reputation or something. I'm really not. Sure, I don't have any problem with him, but I'm by no means close to him either. Not only that, but you also think that there are other anons dedicated to defending him, to the point where they regularly drop UIDs to help defend his reputation.
I want a straight answer, to this: why do you think that FuckAlms has a small band of anonymous, loyal followers? Do you think that FuckAlms is very charismatic, or is bribing them somehow? Why do you think that these people exist?
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 35 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,531
@previous (G)
> Okay, to put it in the clearest terms: I used to regularly visit Tinychan, around two years ago. I then stopped visiting it, to the point that, presently, I never go there.
Jesus, you are so awful at this. First you tell us Fuckalms has been "harrassed" for 2 years (note the verb tense), and now you tell us you haven't been to Tinychan for the last two years. This is after previously telling us you never frequent the place.
Dude, why are you even doing this? I'm serious, what do you have invested in this? It's so much effort from you just to shield him, all these mesaages across all the threads. Did Fuckalms personally send you or is this your own weird hobby?
> Okay, to put it in the clearest terms: I used to regularly visit Tinychan, around two years ago. I then stopped visiting it, to the point that, presently, I never go there.
Jesus, you are so awful at this. First you tell us Fuckalms has been "harrassed" for 2 years (note the verb tense), and now you tell us you haven't been to Tinychan for the last two years. This is after previously telling us you never frequent the place.
Dude, why are you even doing this? I'm serious, what do you have invested in this? It's so much effort from you just to shield him, all these mesaages across all the threads. Did Fuckalms personally send you or is this your own weird hobby?
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,532
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,539
@previous (悟)
No I'm not, Ninjj. Usually I don't wade into this whole mess. I'm just interested to see how far he will take it.
@716,531 (D)
I know it's been going on for over two years because FuckAlms said so himself, right here on Minichan:
https://minichan.org/topic/55269#reply_716302
Now, please answer my question: why do you think that FuckAlms has a loyal band of followers? Right there, you've implied that FuckAlms personally ordered me to converse with you, as if I was somehow obligated to listen to him. Why do you think he has such strong influence over certain people?
No I'm not, Ninjj. Usually I don't wade into this whole mess. I'm just interested to see how far he will take it.
@716,531 (D)
I know it's been going on for over two years because FuckAlms said so himself, right here on Minichan:
https://minichan.org/topic/55269#reply_716302
Now, please answer my question: why do you think that FuckAlms has a loyal band of followers? Right there, you've implied that FuckAlms personally ordered me to converse with you, as if I was somehow obligated to listen to him. Why do you think he has such strong influence over certain people?
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,541
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 46 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,544
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 53 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,547
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,549
@previous (悟)
Nothing unusual.
Dave needs everybody to know that FuckAlms is s terrible person, and apparently has a loyal cult of anonymous BBS followers that he orders around.
Nothing unusual.
Dave needs everybody to know that FuckAlms is s terrible person, and apparently has a loyal cult of anonymous BBS followers that he orders around.
悟 replied with this 10 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,551
Anonymous D replied with this 10 years ago, 14 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,552
@716,539 (G)
> I know it's been going on for over two years because FuckAlms said so himself, right here on Minichan:
> https://minichan.org/topic/55269#reply_716302
I think we're getting to the crux of your problem/obsession here, and it can be summarized with a very simple question. It runs thus: do you always believe absolutely every single thing somebody writes on the internet?
That's 4 times now you have responded to a question about Fuckalms with the effect of "Because he himself wrote it, right here!" Why are rumours about Fuckalms "inaccurate"? "Because he wrote it!" Why do you think Fuckalms is a guy? "Because he never said otherwise when I addressed him that way!" Why do you take his interpretation of the last two years as "harrassment"? "Because that's what he himself described it as, right here!"
Fuckin' lol. "He himself...", three times you've written that, like he's your personal Jesus, like he's the unquestionable Delphic Oracle of Truth.
Whatever dude, you did your best but you've embarrassed yourself as his little cocksucker.
> I know it's been going on for over two years because FuckAlms said so himself, right here on Minichan:
> https://minichan.org/topic/55269#reply_716302
I think we're getting to the crux of your problem/obsession here, and it can be summarized with a very simple question. It runs thus: do you always believe absolutely every single thing somebody writes on the internet?
That's 4 times now you have responded to a question about Fuckalms with the effect of "Because he himself wrote it, right here!" Why are rumours about Fuckalms "inaccurate"? "Because he wrote it!" Why do you think Fuckalms is a guy? "Because he never said otherwise when I addressed him that way!" Why do you take his interpretation of the last two years as "harrassment"? "Because that's what he himself described it as, right here!"
Fuckin' lol. "He himself...", three times you've written that, like he's your personal Jesus, like he's the unquestionable Delphic Oracle of Truth.
Whatever dude, you did your best but you've embarrassed yourself as his little cocksucker.
Anonymous G replied with this 10 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,559
@previous (D)
You're very insistent that FuckAlms has a cult of personality around him. You seem to think he's very charismatic, for a person you put down so much.
You're very insistent that FuckAlms has a cult of personality around him. You seem to think he's very charismatic, for a person you put down so much.
beckyderp !Hi.HILLARY replied with this 10 years ago, 53 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #716,565
tinydicks